emuswe should mention that it describes some details about MIX
vanitasvitaeyou could also mention https://claucece.github.io/Secure-Messaging-Summit/
vanitasvitaealthough I fear that the newsletter will be released too late
Licaon_Kter> https://claucece.github.io/Secure-Messaging-Summit/
_2 days of discussing, which silo is better_
vanitasvitaeI wouldn't say that
Licaon_KterZoom, Telegram, Facebook, Wire
One mention of the word "federation"
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Licaon_Kter...and of course 3-5 times Signal
wurstsalathas left
wurstsalathas joined
alkinohas joined
emusvanitasvitae: If ee havent mention it this year we can do so
emusAh I see ^^. But I wouldnt mind to mention it.
actually its sad noone from the XSF sits there
SouLI can't find where XMPP is mentioned there
MattJIt isn't
SouLAh :)
MattJ(it obviously should be :) )
MattJWell, doesn't need to be, but it would be good if we had a presence. Some of the topics seem interesting.
wurstsalatShould proposed XEPs also be mentioned in the newsletter? I tend not to
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
emuswurstsalat: Former time it was, but I cannot evalute if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletters
however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about stanfardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that.
If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway)
emuswurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter.
however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about stanfardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that.
If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway)
ldkjgoiwehas left
emuswurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter.
however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about standardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that.
If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway)
emuswurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter.
however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about standartization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that.
If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway)
ldkjgoiwehas joined
debaclehas left
debaclehas joined
erszczhas left
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
winfriedhas left
winfriedhas joined
erszczhas joined
erszczhas left
peetahhas left
Nÿcohas left
wurstsalatemus: if there are proper introductions for each type (update, new proposed extension, ..) it could actually be a nice way to show people the standardisation process. I'll try to come up with something :)
emuswurstsalat: Yes, I would really like that and I also dont care if this expands the size of the newsletter. one can always skip that section
emusHello jcbrand, may you have time to replace the XMPP avatar with the XMPP only logo, but place another banner for the background which states XMPP somehow?