XSF Communications Team - 2020-08-19

  1. wurstsalat

    https://tigase.net/tigase-im-mix/

  2. emus

    yep saw it too

  3. emus

    we should mention that it describes some details about MIX

  4. vanitasvitae

    you could also mention https://claucece.github.io/Secure-Messaging-Summit/

  5. vanitasvitae

    although I fear that the newsletter will be released too late

  6. Licaon_Kter

    > https://claucece.github.io/Secure-Messaging-Summit/ _2 days of discussing, which silo is better_

  7. vanitasvitae

    I wouldn't say that

  8. Licaon_Kter

    Zoom, Telegram, Facebook, Wire One mention of the word "federation" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  9. Licaon_Kter

    ...and of course 3-5 times Signal

  10. emus

    vanitasvitae: If ee havent mention it this year we can do so

  11. emus

    Ah I see ^^. But I wouldnt mind to mention it. actually its sad noone from the XSF sits there

  12. SouL

    I can't find where XMPP is mentioned there

  13. MattJ

    It isn't

  14. SouL

    Ah :)

  15. MattJ

    (it obviously should be :) )

  16. MattJ

    Well, doesn't need to be, but it would be good if we had a presence. Some of the topics seem interesting.

  17. wurstsalat

    Should proposed XEPs also be mentioned in the newsletter? I tend not to

  18. emus

    wurstsalat: Former time it was, but I cannot evalute if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletters however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about stanfardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that. If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway) ✎

  19. emus

    wurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter. however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about stanfardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that. If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway) ✏

  20. emus

    wurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter. however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about standardization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that. If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway) ✏

  21. emus

    wurstsalat: Formers time it was, but I cannot evaluate if this makes sense for readers and editors/reviewers who read the newsletter. however, people who are not familiar with the background can see there there is a process about standartization, which I think is very very good and a key element of XMPP. We should not hide that. If we decide against that I would like to see at least a summarizing sentence which links ot the full month of XEP reviews (maybe we should do that anyway) ✏

  22. wurstsalat

    emus: if there are proper introductions for each type (update, new proposed extension, ..) it could actually be a nice way to show people the standardisation process. I'll try to come up with something :)

  23. emus

    wurstsalat: Yes, I would really like that and I also dont care if this expands the size of the newsletter. one can always skip that section

  24. emus

    Hello jcbrand, may you have time to replace the XMPP avatar with the XMPP only logo, but place another banner for the background which states XMPP somehow?

  25. emus

    https://jabbers.one:5281/upload/i64iBPl3rOFhRKaK/b9ba8a7f-b223-4101-8f4e-48c6194a573e.png

  26. jcbrand

    Sorry emus, not at the moment

  27. emus

    ok