XSF Communications Team

00:01:53 qwestion has left
00:05:47 qwestion has joined
00:14:25 intosi has left
00:27:44 Toxi has left
00:28:15 adiaholic has joined
00:33:47 neox has left
00:35:00 adiaholic has left
00:35:27 goffi has joined
00:39:38 wh0 has left
00:42:30 wh0 has joined
00:44:26 intosi has joined
01:00:49 intosi has left
01:02:56 goffi has left
01:04:14 la|r|ma has left
01:15:32 adiaholic has joined
01:21:54 Toxi has joined
01:28:14 adiaholic has left
01:34:57 adiaholic has joined
01:41:55 adiaholic has left
01:45:20 intosi has joined
01:53:14 adiaholic has joined
01:56:31 qwestion has left
01:58:21 adiaholic has left
02:00:29 xutaxkamay has joined
02:00:31 debacle has left
02:01:38 intosi has left
02:20:37 emus kikuchiyo: can you remove deprecated and obsolete xeps? Link Mauve: wurstsalat can we use his script to render a list like this? or can the PR do such a thing already?
02:46:12 intosi has joined
02:49:15 kikuchiyo has left
02:51:16 malevolent_benedict has joined
02:59:38 kikuchiyo has joined
03:02:39 intosi has left
03:19:37 malevolent_benedict has left
03:19:42 malevolent_benedict has joined
03:24:23 SouL has left
03:28:16 adiaholic has joined
03:39:46 adiaholic has left
03:40:59 singpolyma has left
03:41:26 singpolyma has joined
03:47:04 intosi has joined
03:49:06 adiaholic has joined
03:58:15 malevolent_benedict has left
04:00:36 adiaholic has left
04:04:10 intosi has left
04:06:49 adiaholic has joined
04:16:51 adiaholic has left
04:18:19 adiaholic has joined
04:22:19 intosi has joined
04:27:07 Jérôme has left
04:38:27 intosi has left
04:41:16 adiaholic has left
04:41:38 CybHero has joined
04:42:28 adiaholic has joined
05:01:47 adiaholic has left
05:03:18 adiaholic has joined
05:08:20 adiaholic has left
05:12:42 adiaholic has joined
05:19:27 SouL has joined
05:23:03 intosi has joined
05:26:27 adiaholic has left
05:41:29 intosi has left
05:52:20 Jérôme has joined
06:00:10 wh0 has left
06:02:10 wh0 has joined
06:03:31 Jeybe has joined
06:15:56 me9 has joined
06:16:10 Titi has left
06:16:18 adiaholic has joined
06:18:04 Titi has joined
06:20:12 praveen has joined
06:24:05 intosi has joined
06:25:32 kikuchiyo emus: I noticed that xep 0048 is deprecated but a requirement for _advanced group chat_ https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0459.html#nt-idm45924173849280
06:32:05 kikuchiyo Also I was wondering why there are widely adopted XEPs which are final/stable that don't show up in 0453.
06:38:37 msavoritias has joined
06:40:26 intosi has left
06:40:47 me9 has left
06:40:51 kikuchiyo > kikuchiyo: can you remove deprecated and obsolete xeps? I can provide a file without those lines. My intent to include those was to raise the question whether they should be removed from affected clients, or whether they are backward compatibilities. (That is a question for XSF and client devs.)
06:51:14 wurstsalat has joined
06:58:02 emus has left
07:05:36 Jérôme has left
07:09:34 kikuchiyo And what's up with XEP-0114 as a part of _core_ compliance but nobody is using or documenting it?
07:11:41 Jérôme has joined
07:24:48 intosi has joined
07:43:02 praveen has left
07:43:15 intosi has left
07:43:19 intosi has joined
07:43:26 praveen has joined
07:46:47 goffi has joined
07:57:45 adiaholic has left
07:58:30 neox has joined
08:04:55 p42ity has joined
08:05:28 pitchum has left
08:06:18 Alex has joined
08:11:48 Sam has left
08:15:48 adiaholic has joined
08:16:40 msavoritias has left
08:16:44 msavoritias has joined
08:20:55 adiaholic has left
08:26:54 Sam has joined
08:29:11 adiaholic has joined
08:35:53 adiaholic has left
08:39:47 adiaholic has joined
08:41:00 la|r|ma has joined
08:44:52 adiaholic has left
08:45:52 la|r|ma ~~0114 is only for servers. client's can't implement it.~~ ✎
08:45:59 la|r|ma 0114 is only for servers. clients can't implement it. ✏
08:46:22 adiaholic has joined
08:47:52 la|r|ma I agree 0048 should probably be removed from an upcoming iteration of compliance suite, we have it there because it remains the most used method for as long as some clients won't implement 0402
08:49:26 la|r|ma final/stable doesn't imply that it's always a good idea to implement it. 0258 for example is stable, but it's a niche feature not relevant to most clients and certainly not for the public, federated XMPP network.
08:50:34 kikuchiyo la|r|ma: > 0114 is only for servers. clients can't implement it. oh my bad, parsing bug.
08:55:08 kikuchiyo la|r|ma: > final/stable doesn't imply that it's always a good idea to implement it. 0258 for example is stable, but it's a niche feature not relevant to most clients and certainly not for the public, federated XMPP network. Yes, but what about those widely supported like 0199, 0203 ...
08:58:47 la|r|ma 0199 doesn't need to be implemented. It can be useful for connectivity checks to your server, but those can also be done in another way.
08:58:49 la|r|ma 0203 is kinda implicit via 0313, could be made explicit though.
09:13:42 debacle has joined
09:33:26 Link Mauve kikuchiyo, instead of directing DOAP updates to you, it’d be better to direct them to xmpp.org and for you to use it as your source of DOAP files.
09:34:55 Jérôme has left
09:35:12 Link Mauve You might want to add the Jingle logo to Jingle, like you added the OMEMO logo for legacy OMEMO support.
09:38:53 kikuchiyo Link Mauve: ok, give me a link to include in the next pdf.
09:39:16 kikuchiyo Which of the following XEPs are only for servers? 225, 386, 390, 397, 409, 433, 445
09:42:19 Link Mauve kikuchiyo, https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/tree/master/data contains a JSON file for each client, server and library.
09:42:59 Link Mauve If the doap field is not null, it should point to a valid DOAP file.
09:43:17 Link Mauve Note that the Content-Type is often wrong, so you’ll have to ignore it. :(
09:44:31 kikuchiyo Link Mauve: thx
09:47:50 Jérôme has joined
09:54:41 Sam Link Mauve: there's a Jingle logo? (I was actually looking for something like that the other day and didn't see anything)
10:04:45 wurstsalat emus, I'm not sure there is a script involved. kikuchiyo, did you generate this table by hand?
10:05:15 adiaholic has left
10:08:10 Link Mauve https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/JingleLogo.png
10:08:13 Link Mauve Sam, this one.
10:09:03 Sam TIL; thanks!
10:09:41 Sam I should have known that wikipedia would have it if it existed
10:13:27 COM8 has joined
10:13:59 COM8 has left
10:16:09 adiaholic has joined
10:16:54 COM8 has joined
10:17:20 COM8 has left
10:17:23 COM8 has joined
10:17:24 COM8 has left
10:31:43 emus has joined
10:33:44 emus kikuchiyo: did you do table with a script?
10:34:11 emus kikuchiyo: ah ok
10:37:25 emus Link Mauve: nice
10:37:38 Toxi has left
10:38:03 Toxi has joined
10:53:21 Jérôme has left
10:59:04 SouL has left
10:59:08 SouL has joined
11:03:12 adiaholic has left
11:05:25 adiaholic has joined
11:08:13 goffi has left
11:09:32 goffi has joined
11:10:29 adiaholic has left
11:16:17 emus ~~kikuchiyo: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/1071~~ ✎
11:16:41 emus kikuchiyo: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/1005 ✏
11:17:56 adiaholic has joined
11:24:25 pitchum has joined
11:24:29 wh0 has left
11:25:04 wh0 has joined
11:38:14 adiaholic has left
11:41:35 adiaholic has joined
11:47:11 Wojtek has joined
11:48:08 adiaholic has left
11:51:34 adiaholic has joined
11:56:39 adiaholic has left
11:57:38 adiaholic has joined
12:09:04 Jérôme has joined
12:14:30 intosi has left
12:14:34 intosi has joined
12:21:10 goffi has left
12:25:28 eevvoor has joined
12:31:56 intosi has left
12:41:37 intosi has joined
13:10:29 praveen has left
13:11:30 praveen has joined
13:21:42 singpolyma kikuchiyo: also note that deferred doesn't mean no one implements or that it's a bad idea, just that it missed procedural deadlines. Sometimes deferred stuff becomes stable once again later after someone champions it
13:22:29 la|r|ma Deferred is just another Experimental IMO.
13:22:42 Wojtek has left
13:23:02 la|r|ma We need some "Explicitly Deferred" which is not applied by time but by the fact that nobody is interested any more...
13:25:06 Sam How would that be different from deferred as it is today? We could presumably explicitly move something to deferred if the author indicated they weren't interested, but whether it happens that way or after a year seems about the same.
13:25:42 singpolyma Yeah, and explicitly deferred could still be picked up by someone else later
13:26:13 singpolyma Really I don't look at the status at all, only if the protocol described is good and if anyone implements it
13:26:16 Wojtek has joined
13:28:54 singpolyma And while there xep charts are useful when doing that research, a client saying "we support xep XXX" can mean wildly different things sometimes, so you always have to actually try it
13:31:00 praveen has left
13:31:40 emus singpolyma, la|r|ma: sorry, I think I stupidly raised the to remove it. Question: wouldnt explicitly deferred be obsolete?
13:32:17 Sam No, obsolete means "we do not recommend implementing this", deferred means "no one is working on this, but they might start again in the future and it might still be worth having"
13:32:29 emus ok
13:33:09 singpolyma Obsolete is called "historical" and we all implement them anyway because... History
13:33:15 la|r|ma Also the reason for deferred could be "this works, but we somehow feel it should be improved before going to stable"
13:33:20 Sam Nope, historical is a totally different thing :)
13:33:38 Sam la|r|ma: no, that's experimental
13:34:13 Sam Obsolete == security issue, deferred == maintainer needed, experimental == being worked on but not ready for stable, historical == documentation of a defacto standard
13:34:24 la|r|ma Sam, except if the last change is moer than a year ago
13:34:27 la|r|ma which is why I say deferred is sometimes the same as experimental
13:34:35 singpolyma Ok, I would definitely not read obsolete as a security issue
13:34:47 Sam Sure, that's just the editor forgetting to do things, it's not supposed to happen that way
13:34:52 la|r|ma deferred is definitely not maintainer needed
13:35:08 la|r|ma it's also sometimes "nobody ever really wanted that XEP"
13:35:22 la|r|ma or "we want to get more insights first"
13:35:29 Sam That's the most likely reason, but sure, there are other reasons to obsolete something. If I'm generalizing though that's the way to think about it if you're not going to actually go dig in and figure out why.
13:35:36 praveen has joined
13:35:45 Sam No, it's neither of those, deferred is just "maintainer needed".
13:36:23 singpolyma Possibly maintainer is needed because no one wants the xep and so no maintainer will be found
13:36:30 Sam Or rather, it's not necessarily "needed" just "no maintainer" if you want to be pedantic. The point is that deferred XEPs *might* be wanted and maintained again in the future
13:36:59 Sam And it's definitely not "we want to get more insights first" unless it's just a mistake and the editor needs to mark it as deferred.
13:37:36 Sam At least, not primarily. These things aren't mutually exclusive.
13:37:44 la|r|ma There is a number of deferred XEPs where someone designed the spec, everybody agrees it's probably good as is, but nobody implemented it so nobody is really certain. There is no lack of maintainer in those cases.
13:37:51 Sam Sure, it can be "we want to get more insight" but then the author leaves so it goes to deferred and it's both.
13:37:52 singpolyma Sam: I think the point is that defferred is "expired experimental" so it could mean anything experimental means
13:38:15 la|r|ma The XEP author is not always a developer
13:38:43 singpolyma Yeah, XEPs getting published with numbers before there are two implementations is an issue
13:39:37 Sam Fair enough; maybe I'm wrong, after all these years writing XEPs the XSF process still seems obtuse and confusing to me, so it's quite possible.
13:40:15 la|r|ma Maybe check your own XEPs that are deferred and see if they are deferred because you don't want to maintain them or if there is another reason
13:40:46 Sam They are deferred because I wasn't maintaining them.
13:42:01 adiaholic has left
13:43:16 adiaholic has joined
13:44:05 singpolyma I think we're covering two perspectives here. I think that from a procedural / author / XSF perspective deferred of course means "no maintianer" but that's not the information a XEP reader needs or cares about so they will try to infer a more useful status like "fine but abandoned" vs "needs work" vs "being used in the wild but no one cared to bump the xep"
13:46:16 emus Okay guys - Let's move the discussion to xsf@ best I think 🙂
13:46:42 singpolyma Sorry :)
13:47:21 emus No need to be sorry. Please dont feel disencouraged :)
13:48:17 adiaholic has left
13:55:32 Alex has left
13:57:06 singpolyma has left
13:57:40 Alex has joined
13:58:19 adiaholic has joined
14:03:26 me9 has joined
14:05:00 singpolyma has joined
14:05:07 adiaholic has left
14:09:28 wh0 has left
14:11:58 wh0 has joined
14:13:50 p42ity has left
14:13:52 p42ity has joined
14:13:56 p42ity has left
14:16:03 adiaholic has joined
14:21:11 adiaholic has left
14:28:13 adiaholic has joined
14:38:21 p42ity has joined
14:39:12 p42ity has left
14:41:06 CybHero has left
14:41:07 CybHero has joined
14:43:12 la|r|ma has left
14:52:12 goffi has joined
14:58:10 Wojtek has left
14:58:25 Wojtek has joined
15:01:00 singpolyma has left
15:01:42 singpolyma has joined
15:08:08 kikuchiyo has left
15:28:51 singpolyma has left
15:31:15 singpolyma has joined
15:39:15 Wojtek has left
15:42:53 p42ity has joined
15:43:49 p42ity has left
15:45:12 kikuchiyo has joined
15:45:13 neox has left
15:45:22 neox has joined
15:48:21 singpolyma has left
15:54:20 singpolyma has joined
16:08:04 CybHero has left
16:43:21 p42ity has joined
16:44:38 p42ity has left
16:56:36 praveen has left
17:00:35 Wojtek has joined
17:10:54 wh0 has left
17:11:07 wh0 has joined
17:15:58 la|r|ma has joined
17:22:49 Titi has left
17:28:01 adiaholic has left
17:29:59 adiaholic has joined
17:31:08 abod has joined
17:35:17 adiaholic has left
17:38:16 adiaholic has joined
17:39:00 Wojtek has left
17:39:18 Wojtek has joined
17:40:37 qwestion has joined
17:40:50 praveen has joined
17:43:21 adiaholic has left
17:47:17 adiaholic has joined
17:53:46 Jeybe has left
17:54:47 abod has left
17:55:36 adiaholic has left
17:57:28 adiaholic has joined
17:58:18 debacle has left
18:02:33 adiaholic has left
18:07:19 CybHero has joined
18:09:05 Jérôme has left
18:17:17 adiaholic has joined
18:22:23 adiaholic has left
18:25:40 adiaholic has joined
18:28:26 Titi has joined
18:45:53 adiaholic has left
18:46:41 CybHero has left
18:46:42 CybHero has joined
18:47:18 CybHero has left
18:47:19 CybHero has joined
18:48:05 CybHero has left
18:48:05 CybHero has joined
18:48:09 qwestion has left
18:52:03 adiaholic has joined
18:58:34 CybHero has left
19:04:08 adiaholic has left
19:09:20 adiaholic has joined
19:13:34 abod has joined
19:15:23 adiaholic has left
19:18:29 praveen has left
19:28:16 adiaholic has joined
19:34:09 adiaholic has left
19:34:18 adiaholic has joined
19:42:59 emus I invite to collaborate the review of the GSoC applications text within the next 24hrs. PLEASE use the comment function ONLY and do not edit directly: https://yopad.eu/p/xsf_gsoc2022 See top bar.
19:48:59 abod has left
19:50:38 debacle has joined
19:56:31 Wojtek has left
19:56:50 Wojtek has joined
20:02:57 Jeybe has joined
20:07:41 p42ity has joined
20:29:03 adiaholic has left
20:33:17 adiaholic has joined
20:38:22 Wojtek has left
20:38:53 p42ity has left
20:40:41 adiaholic has left
20:50:48 adiaholic has joined
20:53:21 Jérôme has joined
20:55:57 adiaholic has left
20:58:58 Toxi has left
21:03:15 adiaholic has joined
21:06:59 TheCoffeMaker emus: I have to send the PR with the ES translation ... Didnt have time to finish it yet 🥺
21:13:45 adiaholic has left
21:16:24 emus has left
21:17:00 jcbrand has left
21:18:23 adiaholic has joined
21:18:44 emus has joined
21:19:27 emus no worries, take your time
21:27:44 adiaholic has left
21:31:49 Jeybe has left
22:04:49 goffi has left
22:09:46 adiaholic has joined
22:15:38 adiaholic has left
22:32:28 Jérôme has left
22:43:39 emus has left
22:47:57 msavoritias has left
22:48:23 adiaholic has joined
22:53:24 adiaholic has left
23:07:24 wurstsalat has left
23:11:45 Titi has left
23:22:18 debacle has left
23:22:59 Alex has left
23:24:58 me9 has left
23:48:25 adiaholic has joined
23:53:27 adiaholic has left
23:58:18 adiaholic has joined