XSF Communications Team - 2022-04-01


  1. patasca has joined
  2. adiaholic has joined
  3. intosi has left
  4. wh0 has left
  5. singpolyma has left
  6. wh0 has joined
  7. qwestion has joined
  8. intosi has joined
  9. singpolyma has joined
  10. praveen has left
  11. patasca has left
  12. patasca has joined
  13. adiaholic has left
  14. patasca has left
  15. patasca has joined
  16. intosi has left
  17. Alex has left
  18. adiaholic has joined
  19. adiaholic has left
  20. intosi has joined
  21. la|r|ma has left
  22. intosi has left
  23. singpolyma has left
  24. singpolyma has joined
  25. adiaholic has joined
  26. patasca has left
  27. adiaholic has left
  28. singpolyma has left
  29. singpolyma has joined
  30. adiaholic has joined
  31. patasca has joined
  32. adiaholic has left
  33. intosi has joined
  34. adiaholic has joined
  35. singpolyma has left
  36. singpolyma has joined
  37. intosi has left
  38. adiaholic has left
  39. adiaholic has joined
  40. patasca has left
  41. wh0 has left
  42. wh0 has joined
  43. patasca has joined
  44. intosi has joined
  45. adiaholic has left
  46. Toxi has left
  47. *IM* has left
  48. intosi has left
  49. adiaholic has joined
  50. *IM* has joined
  51. patasca has left
  52. adiaholic has left
  53. patasca has joined
  54. adiaholic has joined
  55. adiaholic has left
  56. adiaholic has joined
  57. intosi has joined
  58. adiaholic has left
  59. adiaholic has joined
  60. intosi has left
  61. intosi has joined
  62. jcbrand has joined
  63. adiaholic has left
  64. adiaholic has joined
  65. intosi has left
  66. patasca has left
  67. patasca has joined
  68. adiaholic has left
  69. wh0 has left
  70. wh0 has joined
  71. adiaholic has joined
  72. Jeybe has joined
  73. patasca has left
  74. Toxi has joined
  75. adiaholic has left
  76. adiaholic has joined
  77. adiaholic has left
  78. intosi has joined
  79. patasca has joined
  80. intosi has left
  81. emus has joined
  82. eevvoor has left
  83. intosi has joined
  84. msavoritias has joined
  85. patasca has left
  86. adiaholic has joined
  87. debacle has joined
  88. praveen has joined
  89. intosi has left
  90. patasca has joined
  91. *IM* has left
  92. *IM* has joined
  93. patasca has left
  94. adiaholic has left
  95. adiaholic has joined
  96. intosi has joined
  97. adiaholic has left
  98. pitchum has joined
  99. Licaon_Kter has left
  100. Licaon_Kter has joined
  101. Titi has left
  102. Alex has joined
  103. Titi has joined
  104. emus > MattJ escribió: > I considered an XMPP Discourse in the past, but can't be bothered to run it (the XSF could get a discount off hosting though, which I considered looking into) Yes, before we deploy new software can we plese compare and weight?
  105. kikuchiyo has left
  106. emus Is that now official or just for mellium?
  107. emus because I would disagree deployments before we have not compared
  108. Titi has left
  109. intosi has left
  110. goffi has joined
  111. neox has joined
  112. p42ity has joined
  113. intosi has joined
  114. wh0 has left
  115. wh0 has joined
  116. Titi has joined
  117. adiaholic has joined
  118. patasca has joined
  119. wurstsalat has joined
  120. adiaholic has left
  121. adiaholic has joined
  122. p42ity has left
  123. adiaholic has left
  124. goffi has left
  125. goffi has joined
  126. patasca has left
  127. adiaholic has joined
  128. adiaholic has left
  129. *IM* has left
  130. adiaholic has joined
  131. patasca has joined
  132. debacle has left
  133. p42ity has joined
  134. *IM* has joined
  135. adiaholic has left
  136. adiaholic has joined
  137. qwestion has left
  138. adiaholic has left
  139. adiaholic has joined
  140. wh0 has left
  141. wh0 has joined
  142. adiaholic has left
  143. adiaholic has joined
  144. patasca has left
  145. adiaholic has left
  146. *IM* has left
  147. *IM* has joined
  148. Sam It will be for anything, not just Mellium.
  149. Sam Submitted.
  150. adiaholic has joined
  151. praveen has left
  152. praveen has joined
  153. adiaholic has left
  154. adiaholic has joined
  155. adiaholic has left
  156. Wojtek has joined
  157. emus Sam: but sorry. I'm against this without comparing the system and actually agreeing together. we have few resources and in the end I will be called to deal with things etc.
  158. Sam Don't be a part of it then. This is just something I'm doing.
  159. patasca has joined
  160. emus Well I assume we have CommTeam which coordinates on such topics.
  161. adiaholic has joined
  162. MattJ emus: I think you're missing the point of what I said - this is not an XSF project
  163. emus Ok
  164. emus Anyway, it would make sense to maybe to try to align so we can agree and push things all together
  165. singpolyma has left
  166. adiaholic has left
  167. singpolyma has joined
  168. patasca has left
  169. emus and especially if it relates to kind of official domains
  170. Toxi I hate to disturb but i thought its maybe interesting for some of you. https://sedo.com/search/details/?domain=xmpp.de
  171. adiaholic has joined
  172. emus And in general, I also suggested to deploy something like a forum and would have appreciated to have a discussion instead of pushing an agenda without looking left and right...
  173. emus Toxi: thanks
  174. adiaholic has left
  175. adiaholic has joined
  176. MattJ emus: where was the discussion about the providers project?
  177. Licaon_Kter https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0464.html albeit the date is wrong :)
  178. wh0 has left
  179. adiaholic has left
  180. adiaholic has joined
  181. wh0 has joined
  182. adiaholic has left
  183. adiaholic has joined
  184. emus > MattJ escribió: > emus: where was the discussion about the providers project? well I know and I refuse to make more it a topic because we are also deploying. but here two officials from the commteam did agree to it. And, dont get me wrong, I am not against deploying new things but would prefer to align in general, especially if one is saying "hey can we please compare first before we deploy something" and I wonder in general where we have some coordinating team if it doesnt matter
  185. adiaholic has left
  186. nuron has left
  187. nuron has joined
  188. MattJ Again, xmpp.net is not as XSF thing, and it has nothing to do with commteam
  189. MattJ Sam could easily have used a different domain
  190. MattJ Being a subdomain of xmpp.net does not make it an XSF thing, and this is the difference
  191. Toxi has left
  192. Wojtek has left
  193. Wojtek has joined
  194. emus MattJ: yes, I understood this, and is good. but see it from this perspective (and this is kind of my persepctive): whatever we do at .net will be treated as official. people will not differ between org and net. everything will be the same for them. Thats why I would like to have a general discussion first. And how many forums we want to deploy? why not aligned before we get more random and fragmented solutions here and there... And I usually always ask for opinion and feedback even though it seems I wouldnt need to. Why? because I want people to support approaches and work in the same direction with the majority... If we usually just do what we want we fragment again and again and thats what I am against in terms of communication... Thats what I am not so satisfied here... Its not that I want block, can we have some discourse first please even its not required officially? I hope my point is clear. (And yes, I raised the discussion topic that we need to communicate, too. we have not yet spread the word as it is not ready to show yet and we will ask for it. And of course I already reachef out to your opinion, too Matt)
  195. eevvoor has joined
  196. MattJ Then if the complaint is that xmpp.net might be accidentally considered official, the real solution is to find a different domain that cannot be considered that
  197. Link Mauve Maybe jabber.network?
  198. Link Mauve Or joinjabber.org?
  199. MattJ I have a hesitation to use any jabber.* domain, but maybe
  200. Link Mauve Right.
  201. MattJ Personally I consider it a matter of time until someone in the Cisco legal department decides to take a shot at those
  202. MattJ Hopefully I'm wrong... I can't predict the future, but my experience of large companies make me personally feel it's inevitable
  203. emus > MattJ escribió: > Then if the complaint is that xmpp.net might be accidentally considered official, the real solution is to find a different domain that cannot be considered that No of course not.
  204. pep. has joined
  205. pep. I guess people at joinjabber would be happy to have this kind of thing running? Personally I don't want to undertake maintenance alone. And it may have to go through a meeting (*fear*)
  206. emus I basically asking to please have a discourse, ask to coordinate and find a sweet spot... And I hope maintenance and responsibilities are clear when this is running. in the end people will reach out to us because of the forum. and then I just say "not my department" or what?
  207. emus pep.: no, leave it at xmpp.net I just dont like that it gets rushed through without and respect to annotations
  208. emus pep.: no, leave it at xmpp.net I just dont like that it gets rushed through without respect to annotations
  209. MattJ emus, nothing is rushed through. If people make reasonable requests for xmpp.net subdomains or hosting, I see no reason to decline such requests.
  210. pep. connotations*?
  211. singpolyma MattJ: I expect Cisco legal knows it's *far* too late to consider a trademark action against something like joinjabber.org :)
  212. pep. singpolyma: it doesn't matter, they got the money :p
  213. MattJ singpolyma, haha, although I think it is too late for them to do much about it, I doubt that some intern in the legal department is going to even know about the history of the trademark
  214. singpolyma MattJ: dunno, it's kind of why we send them to law school and make them study it :)
  215. MattJ You'd think so
  216. pep. Plus we never applied to whatever the xsf has as a program for this
  217. singpolyma It's not quite as the level of "to Google" maybe, but it's pretty darn close in the relevant ways
  218. MattJ I'd like to think that the XSF would step in if anyone in the community did find themselves contacted by Cisco, and that things would quickly get resolved
  219. MattJ But I just don't like the unnecessary risk
  220. singpolyma I used to think that way. But the more I dig into tort law the more I realize that there is always risk in doing anything. The best mitigation is having an understanding of the situation and something to present for summary judgment rather than to hope no one ever bothers you
  221. singpolyma Anyway, none of us is a lawyer and we're in three different legal jurisdictions so heh
  222. Alex has left
  223. MattJ :)
  224. Alex has joined
  225. adiaholic has joined
  226. pep. I don't have money to pay court fees anyway and I got no money to pay any potential copyright infringement. It's really not an interesting investment for them
  227. pep. But if they really wanted, they can always come..
  228. adiaholic has left
  229. singpolyma Anyone can always sue you anytime even if you've done nothing :) but yeah, it's not really worth it unless you're protecting the mark (no copyright involved in this case, and the mark is already widely used for decades so protection value is meh) or for a hoped settlement (which only matter if the other side has *lots* of money)
  230. wh0 has left
  231. adiaholic has joined
  232. singpolyma Like, I could see you and claim you abuse my trademark "huppelii" (which I don't have and you don't use) but why would I except just to waste my money bankrupting you?
  233. singpolyma Like, I could sue you and claim you abuse my trademark "huppelii" (which I don't have and you don't use) but why would I except just to waste my money bankrupting you?
  234. adiaholic has left
  235. adiaholic has joined
  236. adiaholic has left
  237. adiaholic has joined
  238. Ingolf has left
  239. adiaholic has left
  240. adiaholic has joined
  241. singpolyma has left
  242. singpolyma has joined
  243. emus has left
  244. adiaholic has left
  245. singpolyma has left
  246. singpolyma has joined
  247. adiaholic has joined
  248. debacle has joined
  249. Toxi has joined
  250. emus has joined
  251. emus > pep. escribió: > connotations*? No, my annotations to deploying this forum software
  252. Jeybe has left
  253. Jeybe has joined
  254. Ingolf has joined
  255. adiaholic has left
  256. adiaholic has joined
  257. adiaholic has left
  258. adiaholic has joined
  259. adiaholic has left
  260. la|r|ma has joined
  261. adiaholic has joined
  262. emus has left
  263. emus has joined
  264. emus has left
  265. emus has joined
  266. adiaholic has left
  267. singpolyma has left
  268. singpolyma has joined
  269. patasca has joined
  270. adiaholic has joined
  271. emus has left
  272. emus has joined
  273. adiaholic has left
  274. adiaholic has joined
  275. Jeybe has left
  276. adiaholic has left
  277. qwestion has joined
  278. adiaholic has joined
  279. qwestion has left
  280. qwestion has joined
  281. qwestion has left
  282. adiaholic has left
  283. qwestion has joined
  284. Jeybe has joined
  285. qwestion has left
  286. adiaholic has joined
  287. qwestion has joined
  288. wh0 has joined
  289. adiaholic has left
  290. singpolyma has left
  291. adiaholic has joined
  292. Wojtek has left
  293. Sam has left
  294. Sam has joined
  295. COM8 has joined
  296. COM8 has left
  297. COM8 has joined
  298. COM8 has left
  299. adiaholic has left
  300. singpolyma has joined
  301. la|r|ma has left
  302. Sam has left
  303. adiaholic has joined
  304. adiaholic has left
  305. Sam has joined
  306. eevvoor has left
  307. patasca has left
  308. Sam has left
  309. Sam has joined
  310. patasca has joined
  311. Sam has left
  312. Sam has joined
  313. patasca has left
  314. Sam has left
  315. Sam has joined
  316. adiaholic has joined
  317. adiaholic has left
  318. Sam has left
  319. adiaholic has joined
  320. Sam has joined
  321. adiaholic has left
  322. adiaholic has joined
  323. adiaholic has left
  324. qwestion has left
  325. patasca has joined
  326. patasca has left
  327. wurstsalat has left
  328. wurstsalat has joined
  329. singpolyma has left
  330. singpolyma has joined
  331. dindon-ccc has left
  332. dindon-ccc has joined
  333. wh0 has left
  334. wh0 has joined
  335. patasca has joined
  336. msavoritias has left
  337. Toxi has left
  338. Jeybe has left
  339. pitchum has left
  340. patasca has left
  341. adiaholic has joined
  342. xutaxkamay has left
  343. xutaxkamay has joined
  344. qwestion has joined
  345. adiaholic has left
  346. patasca has joined
  347. singpolyma has left
  348. singpolyma has joined
  349. patasca has left
  350. patasca has joined
  351. Alex has left
  352. debacle has left
  353. qwestion has left
  354. winfried has left
  355. winfried has joined
  356. patasca has left
  357. goffi has left
  358. patasca has joined
  359. Sam has left
  360. Sam has joined
  361. praveen has left
  362. Sam has left
  363. jcbrand has left
  364. neox has left
  365. emus has left
  366. *IM* has left
  367. *IM* has joined
  368. Sam has joined
  369. patasca has left
  370. patasca has joined
  371. Sam has left
  372. singpolyma has left
  373. singpolyma has joined