-
Licaon_Kter
emus: no email so far
-
emus
Licaon_Kter: I think it might went into the spam folder?
-
emus
others received it
-
Martin
I received it. But I'm selfhosting and not using gmail.
-
emus
ok
-
wurstsalat
Received it, too, using a provider
-
Licaon_Kter
No mail No spam No gmail Not worthy ಠ_ಠ
-
emus
> wurstsalat escribió: > Received it, too, using a provider what do you mean by provider?
-
wurstsalat
not self hosted
-
emus
Licaon_Kter: an you pm me your mail and I will check if it is on the list? or did you reregister?
-
Licaon_Kter
emus: search for licaon lol
-
Licaon_Kter
I didn't do anything....
-
Licaon_Kter
Remember as I've asked: > Do nothing is best? > To keep on receiving it monthly
-
emus
Licaon_Kter: well I cannot estimate what mails people have from their nicknames
-
emus
> Licaon_Kter escribió: > Remember as I've asked: We had to close down Tinyletter because they blocked us
-
Licaon_Kter
I did receive the March 29 email
-
emus
okay great
-
emus
will check
-
emus
singpolyma: are you online?
-
emus
We have this key question: how do we get mailman to either: - put its own signature and modify "From" accordingly - or at least strip all DKIM signatures present in the original sender message (no so prefered solution)
-
pep.
heh, yay DKIM.
-
pep.
Another example of imposed features from big companies that only care about their use-cases
-
emus
Well, now its our own maillist and we have to deal with it. At least we dont block ourselfs from sending
-
emus
and no Captchas and tracking at least
-
singpolyma
emus: ah, I've not used it in that mode but makes sense for this case. Pretty sure it has a dmarc rewrite feature (won't add DKIM of course, but if from/sender is right your mailserver stack should). Lemme see..
-
singpolyma
emus: https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
-
emus
Okay many thanks
-
TheCoffeMaker
emus: during weekend we will send the ES translation
-
emus
TheCoffeMaker: cool