XSF Communications Team - 2023-02-28

  1. papatutuwawa has left

  2. papatutuwawa has joined

  3. emus has left

  4. papatutuwawa has left

  5. Stefan has left

  6. gooya has left

  7. debacle has left

  8. Ramiro Romani has left

  9. pitchum has left

  10. patasca has left

  11. patasca has joined

  12. jcbrand has joined

  13. lenaa has joined

  14. lenaa has left

  15. lenaa has joined

  16. neox has joined

  17. patasca has left

  18. patasca has joined

  19. Stefan has joined

  20. emus has joined

  21. p42ity has joined

  22. p42ity has left

  23. wurstsalat has joined

  24. eevvoor has joined

  25. Titi has joined

  26. nicola

    @wurstsalat I submitted a modification on GH

  27. Jeybe has left

  28. resoli has joined

  29. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has joined

  30. Alex has joined

  31. goffi has joined

  32. Jeybe has joined

  33. wurstsalat

    nicola: where exaclty? I can't find it

  34. intosi has left

  35. nicola

    > nicola: where exaclty? I can't find it Here: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/1253/files

  36. nicola

    Or here: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/1253

  37. intosi has joined

  38. wurstsalat

    not sure if I can't see it or if I don't understand you :) both links point to _merged_ files, and I don't see any comments. if these translations are from you, thank you for that!

  39. Titi has left

  40. debacle has joined

  41. Jeroen.Naeff has joined

  42. emus

    nicola: maybe just post it here?

  43. nicola

    > not sure if I can't see it or if I don't understand you 😊 both links point to _merged_ files, and I don't see any comments. if these translations are from you, thank you for that! My intervention was to change **line 27** with the following: **translation: "Questo articolo Γ¨ stato tradotto da volontari. Pur facendo del loro meglio, la traduzione potrebbe non essere accurata.”**

  44. emus


  45. nicola

    > thanks U R welcome

  46. Licaon_Kter

    Re: pr, how come xep-0474 is both 'new' and 'updated' ? :)

  47. pitchum has joined

  48. debacle has left

  49. wurstsalat

    Licaon_Kter: that section hasn't been updated yet. I tend to wait until the end of the month, so thanks, good reminder :)

  50. lenaa has left

  51. praveen has joined

  52. Licaon_Kter


  53. Titi has joined

  54. la|r|ma has joined

  55. debacle has joined

  56. papatutuwawa has joined

  57. adiaholic has left

  58. lenaa has joined

  59. adiaholic has joined

  60. Titi has left

  61. papatutuwawa has left

  62. gooya has joined

  63. p42ity has joined

  64. Licaon_Kter has left

  65. Licaon_Kter has joined

  66. Ray222 has joined

  67. p42ity has left

  68. jeroen.naeff has joined

  69. jeroen.naeff has left

  70. wojtek has joined

  71. Ray222 has left

  72. p42ity has joined

  73. praveen has left

  74. praveen has joined

  75. Ramiro Romani has joined

  76. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has left

  77. singpolyma has left

  78. singpolyma has joined

  79. la|r|ma has left

  80. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has joined

  81. PeterW has joined

  82. nicola

    @emus here is my article on the DMA Workshop https://notes.nicfab.eu/en/posts/dmaworkshop/ If you have any comments, please let me know.

  83. jeroen.naeff has joined

  84. jeroen.naeff has left

  85. p42ity has left

  86. la|r|ma has joined

  87. wh0 has left

  88. neox has left

  89. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has left

  90. wh0 has joined

  91. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has joined

  92. intosi has left

  93. PeterW has left

  94. emus

    Many thanks!

  95. neox has joined

  96. nicola

    > Many thanks! U R welcome

  97. jeroen.naeff has joined

  98. neox has left

  99. jeroen.naeff has left

  100. gooya

    nicola: Really interesting article thanks for writing it!

  101. Licaon_Kter

    nicola: 'e Jan` 'e Stephan' :)

  102. nicola

    The article is also available on my Gemini capsule here: gemini://notes.nicfab.eu/en/gemlogen/2023/2023-02-28-digitalmarketsact-workshop_en.gmi

  103. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    oh nice

  104. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    thanks πŸ˜€

  105. neox has joined

  106. nicola

    > nicola: 'e Jan` 'e Stephan' 😊 Thank you @Licaon_Kter I corrected

  107. jeroen.naeff has joined

  108. jeroen.naeff has left

  109. Ray222 has joined

  110. jeroen.naeff has joined

  111. jeroen.naeff has left

  112. nicola

    I corrected also the title …

  113. emus

    nicola: --> newsletter

  114. emus

    neox: do you want to support the newsletter preparations outside of github this time? (other volunteers feel free)

  115. Ray222 has left

  116. Licaon_Kter

    nicola: e Markus :)

  117. *IM* has left

  118. adiaholic has left

  119. pep.

    Is it possible to talk about JoinJabber in the next newsletter maybe? Like promoting support channels?

  120. pep.

    We've added them in January but we forgot to put anything in the newsletter I think

  121. adiaholic has joined

  122. emus

    certainly, but maybe lets advertise the entire page of chats right away, too

  123. pep.

    Ah you mean the one on xmpp.org?

  124. pep.

    It's not referencing servers@joinjabber.org I think

  125. pep.

    https://joinjabber.org/about/community/ or this one?

  126. nicola

    > nicola: e Markus 😊 Omg! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Thank you @Licaon_Kter I corrected

  127. emus


  128. pep.

    I think I'd like to change the wording slightly. Specifically the "our" (support chat)

  129. pep.

    This isn't the XSF

  130. pep.

    Not entirely sure how to phrase it, but not this

  131. resoli has left

  132. emus

    Well, tbh I wonder why we not just started again advertising the existing jUser chat instead of creating a new one

  133. emus

    just remove the "our" I would say

  134. pep.

    It's not a new one it's another one. They're not all the same. Policies matter

  135. *IM* has joined

  136. debacle has left

  137. Jeroen.Naeff has left

  138. wojtek has left

  139. emus

    yeah, fragmentation fun... has there been a discussion to get a policy for juser if thats so important? We can advertise it under announcement, but then page and chats too please πŸ™

  140. patasca has left

  141. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    emus the reason was that JoinJabber could get the moderation burden. Plus it was already setup with a site and outreach that people will see. Instead of xmpp.org which nobody finds by themselves

  142. jcbrand has left

  143. jcbrand has joined

  144. emus

    Ok I see, but not sure if I understand. (In general I will not put much efforts in fragmenting or side paths when it comes to communication topics)

  145. lenaa has left

  146. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    its simple. right now its written like the chat is from the xsf

  147. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    (which is not)

  148. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    its provided by the joinjabber collective

  149. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    The "our" specifically that pep. mentioned.

  150. emus

    And why it cannot be done in the juser? thats discussion seem to pass by me

  151. emus

    MSavoritias (fae,ve): yes, I understand that

  152. emus

    and is correct of course

  153. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    you mean why it was decided to have this room? Because it was active and it put less moderation burden on xsf as stated.

  154. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    Plus people can find it from the joinjabber site

  155. pep.

    Specifically on jabber.org, but I guess folks there were happy leaving it away? Dunno

  156. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    which makes more sense because no person will find xmpp.org

  157. emus

    MSavoritias (fae,ve): then why not change that? why they dont find it?

  158. pep.

    Whatever. If the XSF wants to advertize the juser room instead, do that. I personally won't fight it

  159. pep.

    In any case, we have a support room at joinjabber

  160. emus

    Im just confused again how things went rather as stated, we can advertise it, but should use the chance to advertise the other stuff too

  161. MattJ

    What juser room?

  162. emus


  163. MattJ

    There is no juser room on that page

  164. pep.

    MattJ, I assume emus is talking about the one room on jabber.org?

  165. pep.

    That existed, or maybe still exists, I don't know

  166. MattJ

    or confusing it with the juser mailing list

  167. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    does that exist still?

  168. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    I cant find it

  169. MattJ

    xmpp:jabber@conference.jabber.org?join exists

  170. emus

    yeah my bad

  171. MattJ

    It used to be the "user" equivalent to jdev

  172. MattJ

    There was never a juser chat

  173. MattJ

    But jabber@ these days is mostly about jabber.org specifically

  174. MattJ

    We could make it into a generic user support thing again, but I don't see why that's better than pointing to a joinjabber.org chat instead (which is already further in that direction)

  175. emus

    MattJ: then maybe this or will it be deprecated?

  176. emus

    I just bascially think: if we have xsf chat jdev chat editor chat counil chat at xsf then why not a user one

  177. emus

    or support

  178. emus

    ok, but we have that as a muc too

  179. pep.

    I'm going to make this point just because it's fun, not because I think it's a valid one: you're the one talking about fragmentation and you want to create yet another room? :p

  180. emus

    ok I see. but my point was ^

  181. MattJ

    For most of its history, jdev was on conference.jabber.org

  182. emus

    I need to go offlne pep.: feel free as said to add to the pad

  183. MattJ

    It was barely an "XSF" thing

  184. MattJ

    It was just a thing

  185. emus

    pep.: Yes, its right. but you need to step outside: My argumentation as always is: central communication in a decentral network

  186. pep.

    I'm not sure I understand, but from what I understand I think I disagree

  187. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    the point was to change the support thing to something like: "Join the support chat provided by the JoinJabber community" or something

  188. pep.

    I'll PR it

  189. MattJ

    I neither agree nor disagree... I think some centralization is okay, and helpful. I don't think that can be used as an argument to centralize everything, which would be harmful.

  190. MattJ

    I am absolutely okay with our site pointing people in need of assistance to places where they can get that assistance

  191. patasca has joined

  192. Ramiro Romani has left

  193. Ramiro Romani has joined

  194. papatutuwawa has joined

  195. pablo has joined

  196. nicola

    @emus I don’t know who is elaborating on the newsletter, but if you think it useful, you can add my other article entitled β€œDigital Service Act: EU Commission Questions and Answers on identification and counting of active recipients of the service under the DSA”, here: https://notes.nicfab.eu/en/posts/dsa-faq/ However, I don’t want to monopolize the newsletter 😊 Feel free

  197. resoli has joined

  198. p42ity has joined

  199. nicola has left

  200. pep.


  201. p42ity has left

  202. Ray222 has joined

  203. nicola has joined

  204. jeroen.naeff has joined

  205. jeroen.naeff has left

  206. neox

    > neox: do you want to support the newsletter preparations outside of github this time? > > (other volunteers feel free) emus: yes, feel free to tell me what do to

  207. resoli has left

  208. pablo has left

  209. resoli has joined

  210. nicola has left

  211. resoli has left

  212. pablo has joined

  213. p42ity has joined

  214. p42ity has left

  215. lenaa has joined

  216. nicola has joined

  217. Titi has joined

  218. lenaa has left

  219. eevvoor has left

  220. lenaa has joined

  221. eevvoor has joined

  222. debacle has joined

  223. nicfab has joined

  224. Alacer_dsrt has joined

  225. Ray222 has left

  226. nicfab has left

  227. jeroen.naeff has joined

  228. jeroen.naeff has left

  229. Alacer_dsrt has left

  230. wojtek has joined

  231. eevvoor has left

  232. pablo has left

  233. alacer has left

  234. alacer has joined

  235. praveen has left

  236. alacer has left

  237. emus has left

  238. MSavoritias (fae,ve) has left

  239. neox has left

  240. neox has joined

  241. pablo has joined

  242. goffi has left

  243. jcbrand has left

  244. pablo has left

  245. nuron has left

  246. nuron has joined

  247. nuron has left

  248. nuron has joined

  249. Schimon_ has left

  250. singpolyma has left

  251. singpolyma has joined

  252. singpolyma has left

  253. singpolyma has joined

  254. wojtek has left

  255. lenaa has left

  256. papatutuwawa has left

  257. debacle has left

  258. debacle has joined

  259. debacle has left

  260. debacle has joined

  261. singpolyma has left

  262. resoli has joined

  263. la|r|ma has left

  264. singpolyma has joined