XSF Communications Team - 2026-01-12


  1. Ge0rG

    I also have 16x64 and 32x32 LED iPixel matrix displays that are very bright and blinky that I could bring

  2. emus

    > I also have 16x64 and 32x32 LED iPixel matrix displays that are very bright and blinky that I could bring I think.they would be great. We can show xmpp.org and habe client websites and other stuff open

  3. edhelas

    > also, logistically, I could probably bring a 47" screen, if needed. We can fit some many XEPs on this screen ✨

    🚀 1
  4. Ge0rG

    https://upload.yax.im/upload/JqWGJ0X3TOdsU5oH0XAiquu0/1000014127.jpg

  5. Ge0rG

    emus: like this?

  6. Ge0rG

    this is the xmpp.org website at a font size that is still legible.

  7. Ge0rG

    and no, 32x32 is not enough to render a QR code.

  8. emus

    > 1000014127.jpg Sorry, now I know what you mean

  9. emus

    But please bring it

  10. emus

    > this is the xmpp.org website at a font size that is still legible. At least we tried 😀

  11. Ge0rG

    it can show GIF animations in the respective resolution, so somebody could make... a rotating XMPP logo or something

    👍 1
  12. anubis

    Hm, the newsletter of December advertise the Matrix room while there is already an XMPP room for the FOSDEM 🤔️😅️

  13. anubis

    Hm, the newsletter of December advertise the Matrix room while there is already an XMPP room for the FOSDEM 🤔️😅️ (xmpp:fosdem@conference.monocles.de?join)

  14. emus

    I think there is a mistake from our side that I plan to correct.

  15. Ge0rG

    Subvert the FOSDEM organization and capture back their IM infrastructure?

  16. Kris

    I am sure if the XSF becomes a gold sponsor and offers the infra for free, fosdem will consider it /s

  17. gnemmi

    Hello everybody!

  18. gnemmi

    anubis, can you please pin point where does the December Newsletter advertise the Matrix room?

  19. gnemmi

    I don't remember ever mention it .. and upon re reading, I couldn't find any reference to matrix in the whole document ( other than the matridge entry)

  20. gnemmi

    > I think there is a mistake from our side that I plan to correct. Just point me at it and I'll fix it

  21. emus

    >> I think there is a mistake from our side that I plan to correct. > Just point me at it and I'll fix it I think we need to ask ralphm whats the latest location. I don't I correctly understood.

  22. gnemmi

    Oh .. that. But that's not in the Newsletter. The Newsletter only has a link to it.

  23. gnemmi

    Give me a sec

  24. gnemmi

    "I have no idea how that will work out in practice, but for those who have some idea of the usual layout, this is the room between two stairs in the square AW building next to H."

  25. gnemmi

    "One thing to note is that the Lounge, along with 3 other projects will have a room for our stands. AW 1.124"

  26. gnemmi

    https://archive.fosdem.org/2025/stands/

  27. gnemmi

    I still can't find any reference to Matrix on the December Newsletter though

  28. emus

    Thanks! Can you update the blogpost?

  29. gnemmi

    Not really, we still have no confirmation other than ralphm comment at the first Board meeting of this year.

  30. emus

    Ok

  31. gnemmi

    As a matter of fact, FOSDEM still hasn't released any official information about the stands for this year

  32. gnemmi

    https://fosdem.org/2026/stands/

  33. gnemmi

    So, we can't even link to the right spot .. let alone add a picture with the map.

  34. emus

    badrihippo: you are still working on the handout?

  35. emus

    > So, we can't even link to the right spot .. let alone add a picture with the map. Okay, maybe lets wait

  36. gnemmi

    If he is, then he should probably hold it until we get actual proper info and we can add the map to the hand out

  37. ralphm

    gnemmi: I got this information directly from the organisation, and assumed emus was also on the mailinglist as second contact.

  38. gnemmi

    ralphm, I don't doubt the veracity of your info. I was making a point about our inability to link to official FOSDEM information!

  39. ralphm

    Yeah, That's unfortunate

  40. gnemmi

    yeah .. and that was actually the very reason why we ( cal0pteryx and I ) delayed the blog post until mid Jan or so last year

  41. gnemmi

    let me check

  42. gnemmi

    Yup .. https://xmpp.org/2025/01/xmpp-at-fosdem-2025/ Posted on January 10, 2025

  43. gnemmi

    let me double check

  44. gnemmi

    Yup .. https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/1469 by me from on Jan 8, 2025

  45. gnemmi

    We had to hold it until we had official confirmation about the stand location and the talks

  46. emus

    > gnemmi: I got this information directly from the organisation, and assumed emus was also on the mailinglist as second contact. I don't think I got an email here

  47. emus

    🫤

  48. gnemmi

    I found out about all of this on the last Board meeting