XMPP Council - 2010-03-22

  1. Kev

    Ahhar, that's two,t hen.

  2. Kev

    Ralph's sent apologies, so we're just waiting for Remko.

  3. ralphm is not really here

  4. Kev


  5. Kev

    That would be quorum :)

  6. MattJ

    XEP-0136 is wacky

  7. Kev


  8. Kev

    And getting more so.

  9. MattJ


  10. Kev

    So, without Ralph or Remko, I guess we've not got quorum and we give up.

  11. Kev

    7PM UTC+1 next week?

  12. MattJ slaps DST with a wet trout

  13. MattJ

    That'll be fine

  14. MattJ

    I'll send my 136 verdict to the list

  15. Kev

    Okely dokely.

  16. MattJ

    Oh, any response about new members?

  17. Kev

    Fritzy's standing.

  18. Kev

    I'll put the vote onto the agenda for next Monday.

  19. MattJ


  20. Kev

    You know, I'm finally beginning to agree with everyone who says that rosters are screwey.

  21. MattJ

    What's wrong with them?

  22. Kev

    It's daft that I send you a presence stanza with a subscribe in it. You decline it. You're now in my roster.

  23. Kev

    (subscription none)

  24. MattJ

    Ah yes, that's annoying

  25. Kev

    And the client dance is really stupid when adding a new contact.

  26. MattJ

    matthew@silver:~/prosody-hg$ wc -l plugins/mod_{message,iq,presence}.lua 79 plugins/mod_message.lua 78 plugins/mod_iq.lua 388 plugins/mod_presence.lua 545 total

  27. Kev


  28. ralphm

    Indeed, would be nice if we could do away with the old way eventually

  29. Kev

    What's the 'old way' in question?

  30. Kev

    Or the new way, for that matter :)

  31. ralphm

    well, I assume the new way would involve a nice IQ based solution

  32. Kev

    Ah, right, a hypothetic new way :)

  33. ralphm

    juggling presence messages for this is indeed horrible

  34. ralphm

    I tried to implement a session manager recently. Ugh

  35. Kev

    Yes, I'm finally starting to agree with throwing away what we have and doing Roster2

  36. ralphm