XMPP Council - 2011-01-12

  1. Tobias has joined

  2. Tobias has left

  3. Tobias has joined

  4. Tobias has left

  5. Tobias has joined

  6. stpeter has joined

  7. Tobias has left

  8. Tobias has joined

  9. MattJ has joined

  10. stpeter

    we're scheduled to have a meeting soon, right?

  11. linuxwolf has joined

  12. Kev

    9mins, yeah.

  13. Kev

    My alarm should go off in about 5.

  14. stpeter


  15. Kev

    Mind's all over the place today, unusual for me to set an alarm.

  16. stpeter

    my mind's been all over the place since the first of the year, it seems

  17. linuxwolf


  18. stpeter

    but maybe it's this spell of vertigo I've got... ;-)

  19. linuxwolf goes to refill coffee before meeting

  20. waqas has joined

  21. stpeter

    today I'm going to start reviews of open issues related to various topics for the Summit

  22. stpeter

    then post summary messages to standards@

  23. stpeter

    first up will be XEP-0198

  24. stpeter

    I'll start updating http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Radar too

  25. MattJ


  26. Kev


  27. linuxwolf


  28. Kev

    1) Baps

  29. Kev

    Matt and Matt seem to be here, missing Ralph and Nathan.

  30. Kev

    2) Agenda Bashing.

  31. MattJ


  32. linuxwolf

    none here

  33. stpeter

    I might have some AOB items at the end

  34. Kev

    3) Encapsulated Digital Signatures in XMPP http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/encapsulated-signatures.html Accept as XEP?

  35. Kev

    I don't see a reason not to.

  36. Kev

    This is Kurt's alternative to the Encapsulating signatures XEP.

  37. linuxwolf


  38. Kev

    I'm much more keen on encapsulated signatures.

  39. stpeter

    so this is intended to replace XEP-0285?

  40. Kev

    stpeter: not immediately.

  41. Kev

    I mean: Publishing this doesn't deprecate 285

  42. stpeter


  43. MattJ

    Kev, but is that the intention in the long run?

  44. Kev

    The intention is that this is going to prove to be much better and 285 would be retracted.

  45. stpeter

    but in general Kurt prefers this new approach to the older one

  46. stpeter


  47. stpeter


  48. stpeter

    I love it when authors do some rethinking

  49. linuxwolf


  50. Kev

    Kurt would have updated the old one, but I suggested that as it was a completely different approach it deserved a new XEP.

  51. stpeter nods

  52. stpeter

    makes sense to me

  53. Kev

    And it's partly down to a misunderstanding with me that Kurt did 285 in the first place - this was always his preference, I believe.

  54. MattJ

    Ok, +1 then :)

  55. Kev

    4) Service Delegation http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/service-delegation.html Accept as XEP?

  56. Kev

    There are issues that I have with this, but they're not core.

  57. Kev

    So I'd rather publish and address.

  58. stpeter

    always my preference :)

  59. linuxwolf

    same here

  60. MattJ


  61. MattJ

    Someone (in jdev?) suggested PEP would be better, I think it's worth thinking about

  62. Kev


  63. Kev

    It's something that is worth addressing, though, I'm happy for this XEP to evolve to it.

  64. MattJ


  65. Kev

    This is going to be interesting to ST and co too, I expect.

  66. linuxwolf


  67. linuxwolf

    now if gmail.com would support PEP...

  68. stpeter

    hrm yeah

  69. Kev

    Right, was that not objecting from both Matts?

  70. linuxwolf

  71. MattJ

    It was

  72. Kev


  73. Kev

    Next meeting - next Wednesday?

  74. Kev

    I'm going to have problems with several weeks after that, for assorted reasons.

  75. stpeter


  76. MattJ


  77. Kev

    Some insurmountable some not :)

  78. linuxwolf


  79. linuxwolf

    wow…I've got time to get to my next meeting!

  80. Kev

    Righty, what was your 6) AOB Then, Peter?

  81. stpeter


  82. stpeter

    I chatted with Emil Ivov of SIP Communicator (soon to be Jitsi) and we think that the ZRTP spec is ready for Last Call (XEP-0262)

  83. stpeter

    they have an implementation

  84. stpeter

    and feedback has been incorporated

  85. stpeter

    however, he and his team will be at FOSDEM

  86. linuxwolf

    very nice

  87. stpeter

    so we could chat with him there and then issue the Last Call

  88. stpeter

    no real preference here

  89. Kev

    Let's chat at FOSDEM with people we can chat with at FOSDEM.

  90. stpeter

    the ZRTP spec was approved at the IETF last year but still doesn't have an RFC number

  91. stpeter

    sure, WFM

  92. stpeter

    same goes for Jingle Early Media (XEP-0269)

  93. stpeter

    I need to poke Justin Uberti about that one, too

  94. vt100 has joined

  95. stpeter

    http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Radar needs serious attention, but I've started that this morning

  96. MattJ

    I hope 3920bis gets an RFC number before the year is out :)

  97. stpeter

    this will result in lots of experimental XEPs going dormant etc.

  98. stpeter

    MattJ: I hold the record for addressing and approving RFC Editor feedback, I hope to break that record this time ;-)

  99. MattJ


  100. Kev

    stpeter: Radar was originally for my benefit, I think, and I'm not in need of that any more.

  101. waqas has left

  102. stpeter

    Kev: I think it will help me stay more organized :)

  103. Kev

    But if you have other reasons for updating it, feel free :)

  104. Kev

    So will MaybeLater, I'm sure :)

  105. stpeter


  106. stpeter


  107. stpeter

    ok, that's my AOB item

  108. Kev

    Great, anyone else?

  109. MattJ

    Not here

  110. linuxwolf

    not today

  111. Kev


  112. stpeter

    not here, not today, not right now!

  113. linuxwolf

    oh, other than I have tickets and hotel accommodations for FOSDEM

  114. stpeter


  115. Kev


  116. linuxwolf

    that was the fastest I've ever had travel booked and approved

  117. linuxwolf

    literally 20 minutes

  118. Kev


  119. Kev

    Let's get multi-resource sorted :)

  120. linuxwolf


  121. stpeter looks at the 7170 messages in his inbox and blanches

  122. vt100

    .o0( ouch )

  123. Kev

    stpeter: Move them all to another folder, and just move them back 50 at a time or so.

  124. Kev

    Hoorah for mind tricks.

  125. Kev


  126. stpeter


  127. Kev

    Thanks all, tune in next week, same bat time, same bat channel.

  128. Kev bangs the gavel.

  129. stpeter


  130. stpeter updates the calendar

  131. vt100 has left

  132. MattJ

    Thanks Kev

  133. Kev

    And for making me feel far too old - http://superuser.com/questions/231273/what-are-the-windows-a-and-b-drives-used-for

  134. linuxwolf

    oh wow

  135. linuxwolf

    I just found my first HDD … a whole whopping 40MB

  136. linuxwolf

    alright … adios amigos

  137. stpeter


  138. stpeter

    mine was 20

  139. linuxwolf has left

  140. stpeter runs calgen.py

  141. Kev

    Thanks Peter.

  142. Astro has joined

  143. stpeter

    http://xmpp.org/extensions/ is nice if you allow googleapis.com to run scripts :)

  144. MattJ


  145. remko has joined

  146. stpeter

    hey Remko!

  147. remko

    hey peter

  148. remko

    i thought i'ld drop in to see how the meeting went :)

  149. stpeter


  150. stpeter

    yeah, Kev is quick about meetings

  151. remko

    (i did see your microblog announcement in time, though. Good initiative ;-))

  152. Kev

    Kev just has a very short atte

  153. stpeter

    yeah the infrastructure team needs to automate that!

  154. stpeter


  155. remko


  156. Tobias has left

  157. Tobias has joined

  158. remko has left

  159. Fritzy has joined

  160. Tobias has left

  161. mlundblad has joined

  162. Tobias has joined

  163. mlundblad has left

  164. mlundblad has joined