XMPP Council - 2011-02-28

http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/first-council/

The table columns are screwey for me in that -yours too?

how screwy?

the headers?

Yeah.

I guess there are just too many of them.

right

damn first council

9 members

insanity

life got better after that

it will look fine when we get to the years with 5 members

no one really cares what happened back then, but it's good to have a complete historical record

It's better, yes.

the second council still had 9

and lots of votes, too

I know, I know. Us kids today don't know how good we've got it.

:P

the tallies for the second council include votes to defer and reject specs -- I see no special reason to include those in the new tallies, given that no other council has ever recorded those (or even completed such votes)

Deferrence is something that happens automatically without Council involvement. I see no reason for that to appear.

Should rejection be recorded, though?

and the second Council rejected specs only at one meeting, on October 15 2002 :)

Should we be recording that RTT was rejected this week, for example?

I'd have thought we should, but I'm open to debate :)

well

it can't be rejected if it's not a XEP

it simply wasn't accepted

we do have meeting minutes

Ah, you mean state = Rejected :)

the vote tallies are for tracking of specs through the standards process

right

Yes, that should certainly be recorded.

gosh, we really need to make XEP-0045 final -- it progressed to Draft on 2002-11-21 (!)

It needs some work. I'm happy to commit a bunch of edits to it if you don't mind relinquishing some control :)

I'm in the middle of keying in modifications, can we wait until that's done?

Natch.

:)

wow, I've been on hold for a full hour here

perhaps it would make sense to call back later

well, I got dropped -- problem solved

\o/