XMPP Council - 2011-05-11

  1. stpeter

    greetings and salutations

  2. Kev


  3. stpeter

    BTW I never pushed out the Deprecated editions of XEPs 192 and 193, so I'll do that now

  4. stpeter


  5. linuxwolf


  6. ralphm materializes out of thin air

  7. stpeter joins his simultaneous conference call

  8. Fritzy


  9. Fritzy leaves out the north exit.

  10. linuxwolf

    ok, so we doing this thing?

  11. Kev


  12. Kev

    Sorry, clock's out.

  13. linuxwolf


  14. Kev

    Let's check if Matt's here.(J)

  15. Kev

    Nope, doesn't seem so.

  16. Kev

    Council is always so much more inconvenient when I'm in the office.

  17. Kev

    Let's go, then.

  18. linuxwolf


  19. Kev

    1) Roll Call.

  20. linuxwolf


  21. Kev

    I'm here.

  22. Fritzy


  23. Kev

    Ralph was here a moment ago, so I assume he's still here.

  24. Kev

    2) Agenda bashing (Only thing is discussing what Peter would like us to discuss about 220)

  25. ralphm

    i am

  26. Kev

    I guess that's a "No" to bashing.

  27. Kev


  28. Kev

    3) XEP-0220.

  29. linuxwolf

    I've been trying to corner some of our experts

  30. Kev

    There was some heated discussion on this, leading to (or from) removing lots of examples from the XEP.

  31. Fritzy

    saw that

  32. ralphm


  33. ralphm

    because they were bad?

  34. linuxwolf

    confusing, and buggy

  35. Kev

    ralphm: ISTR the examples previously covered dialback in both directions, and had bugs. Peter changed them to only cover the one-way case.

  36. stpeter


  37. Kev

    Peter wanted us to rediscuss this.

  38. Kev

    Ah, and he's here, hoorah.

  39. Kev

    stpeter: What desireth thou of thine Council?

  40. stpeter

    sure, just multitasking here

  41. stpeter

    well, I think folks need to review the spec again / revote

  42. Fritzy


  43. linuxwolf


  44. Kev

    This is voting on moving through to Draft, right?

  45. stpeter


  46. Kev

    I've never touched the DB code, I'll ask the guys here what they think.

  47. Fritzy

    I propose we do that next meeting then.

  48. linuxwolf

    I need to corner some of our experts, and have them do a once-over

  49. Kev


  50. stpeter

    Fritzy: WFM

  51. Kev

    So next week I'll agendaise (!) a vote to Draft on XEP-0220.

  52. stpeter

    given that there was controversy, I wanted to make sure that folks find the current version acceptable

  53. Kev

    4) Date of next meeting Next week as usual?

  54. linuxwolf


  55. Fritzy


  56. linuxwolf

    works for me

  57. Fritzy


  58. stpeter

    about XEP-0178, shall I "publish" another revision?

  59. Kev

    Whisky Foxtrot Mike.

  60. Fritzy


  61. stpeter

    (to incorporate Council feedback)

  62. linuxwolf

    Fritzy: RTFM about TLAs, MF (-:

  63. Kev

    stpeter: I'm happy for you to publish with the discussed changes.

  64. stpeter

    Kev: will do now

  65. linuxwolf


  66. Kev

    5) Any other business.

  67. Fritzy


  68. linuxwolf

    not this week

  69. stpeter

    none here

  70. Fritzy

    I'm going to catch up on email and voting today.

  71. Kev

    There's a few hours left for 178 feedback from people other than linuxwolf and myself.

  72. Kev

    (Well, technically the voting period ended 13minutes ago, but nevermind)

  73. Kev

    I guess we're done for this week then.

  74. Kev

    Thanks all!

  75. linuxwolf

    eh, call it end-of-day (+11:00) (-:

  76. Kev bangs the gavel.

  77. linuxwolf

    nice and short

  78. linuxwolf


  79. linuxwolf goes off to POKE dialback folk

  80. Fritzy


  81. stpeter updates 178 in git

  82. linuxwolf invokes XEP-0132

  83. linuxwolf


  84. linuxwolf suggests not having a meeting all in the third-person

  85. stpeter

    http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0178-1.1.html updated

  86. Kev


  87. stpeter

    see also http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0178/diff/1.0/vs/1.1rc7

  88. stpeter

    Kev: calendar updated

  89. Kev


  90. stpeter

    except calgen.py is still throwing an error on "/xsf-extensions.ics"

  91. Kev

    Oh well :)

  92. stpeter

    it's an XML parsing problem, let's see where that is coming from...

  93. stpeter