KevDoes anyone have the official end of term date to hand?
stpeterKev: we don't know quite yet, depends on election schedule -- I'd think mid-October
KevOK.
linuxwolfit's the meeting before counil/board elections? (-:
stpeterok, those seem like good priorities
KevI'm going to be wanting to miss three sessions starting 31st August, I think.
Kevs/sessions/meetings/
linuxwolfok
MattJAh, ouch, perhaps me too...
MattJWell, starting a little later
linuxwolfeek
stpeterTobias: when you're finish with GSoC, perhaps we can try to finish off XEP-0234, too
stpeter+ed
Tobiassure
MattJI need to look at a calendar, but I don't know if I'll have internet for a couple of weeks from 8th September
KevSo perhaps we'll have a couple of weeks off around the start of September, and come back to hurriedly vote everything through at the end of Sept / start of Aug.
stpeterMattJ: ok
stpeterright
MattJI rather likely shall, but... just in case
linuxwolfKev: you mean start of Oct
Kevlinuxwolf: Very probably.
stpeterBTW I finished with XEP-0045 yesterday -- I'll start poking people for reviews
ralphmFor me, having Jingle and MUC progress seems reasonable for this term
linuxwolfgoes to kill some trees printing XEP-0045
Kev~I was told a million times of all the troubles in my way...
ralphmah yes, I chuckle everytime I see this one
ralphmnot that it is bad, by the way. Just all that added protocol for sending around whitespace
linuxwolf/shrug
ralphmI am +1 on making this experimental
MattJPart of me thinks we should scrap the negotiation and just leave it up to deployments (which is how it is done now)
linuxwolfMattJ: the trick is in-office vs. mobile vs...
linuxwolfI suppose one could run a set of connection managers in the "bad" places and another for the rest of us… (-:
MattJI don't think the case is very different, especially when 198 is in play
MattJA dropped connection is a dropped connection
KevSo, shall we treat this as a ~vote?
KevI'm not strictly against throwing this up as experimental.
KevI'm not particularly in favour of it either.
MattJMe neither
MattJWho said we need to be more accepting? :)
linuxwolfheh
MattJor was it more rejecting?
Kevlinuxwolf: So what's your position?
stpeterI don't have strong feelings about this one -- we'll see if there's energy and interest
MattJOk, then publish it as experimental and we'll see how it fares
linuxwolfI'm +1 to experimental
MattJI see no reason not to, and that's enough for me
KevI don't see a technical reason to block it, so I'm not.
ralphmthat's that then
KevOK, I guess we should leave it a fortnight for Fritzy to comment or such, given that this fell through the gaps.
MattJThanks linuxwolf for reviving it :)
KevOr 10 days, or whatever period we decided was right.
linuxwolfthis was first published a month ago
ralphmwhat linuxwolf syas
linuxwolftechnically, we're well past that
ralphmand I don't think it counts as a DNV
linuxwolfand we did discuss it then, too
KevWhat did we conclude, then?
ralphmnobody objected so nobody objecte
ralphmd
linuxwolfexactly
linuxwolf(-:
KevI had remembered discussing it, was surprised it hadn't been actioned (yay, verbs)
linuxwolfhaha
KevI don't remember what we said at the time, though.
KevIn any case, we're done unless someone else has OB.
linuxwolfnone of us present objected
linuxwolfFritzy had yet to comment
linuxwolfand I think Ralphm joined too late to say something (-:
KevRighty.
stpetersigh, I have another conference call after this one :)
KevYes, publish, then.
KevOK, I'm not hearing any other business, so thanks all.
linuxwolfnone from me
Kevangs the avel.
linuxwolfheh
stpeterKev: would you like to buy a "b"?
Kevangs the bavel.
stpeter:)
linuxwolfoy vey
MattJ:)
MattJNow, one more meeting before I can sleep...
MattJbbl
stpeterthanks, guys
Tobiashas joined
linuxwolfhas left
linuxwolfhas joined
Tobiashas joined
Tobiashas left
MattJhas left
ralphmhas left
Tobiashas joined
Tobiason MUC finishing: wasn't there a discussion sometime back on using SASL for logging into protected rooms instead of specifying the plain text password?
KevTobias: There was a discussion, yes.
TobiasKev, but nothing came out of it, right?
KevRight.
stpeterI think that would be an extension
stpeterI wrote an email about it at least but the feedback wasn't great :)
Tobiasyeah...just came to mind while working on something