XMPP Council - 2011-12-20

  1. Neustradamus has left

  2. codora has joined

  3. codora quietly sits down and waits for the council to begin.

  4. codora has left

  5. codora has joined

  6. mva has joined

  7. codora has left

  8. mva has left

  9. mva has joined

  10. Kev has joined

  11. Tobias has joined

  12. bear has joined

  13. bear has left

  14. mva has left

  15. Tobias has left

  16. Tobias has joined

  17. Tobias has left

  18. Tobias has joined

  19. linuxwolf has joined

  20. Tobias has left

  21. Tobias has joined

  22. linuxwolf has left

  23. linuxwolf has joined

  24. Tobias has left

  25. stpeter has joined

  26. stpeter

    meeting begins in 1 minute?

  27. Kev

    It does.

  28. stpeter

    it seems that some pokage in order :)

  29. Kev

    I've poked Ralph.

  30. Kev

    I don't see Tobias or Matt online.

  31. stpeter

    aha ok

  32. stpeter

    seems not

  33. linuxwolf


  34. stpeter

    clearly these guys don't live by the calendar

  35. Kev

    Matt's just come online.

  36. MattJ has joined

  37. MattJ

    Sorry I'm late - someone was using my computer :)

  38. Kev

    The cheek.

  39. MattJ


  40. Kev

    Well, we have quorum.

  41. linuxwolf


  42. Kev

    Or a quorum, probably.

  43. Kev

    So, assuming we're keeping last term's lateness rules in place, let's start.

  44. stpeter tweets the meeting since denting seems to be impossible at the moment

  45. Kev

    1) Roll call.

  46. Kev

    I'm here.

  47. linuxwolf


  48. MattJ


  49. Kev

    2) DMUC3

  50. MattJ


  51. Kev

    We should really make a decision about this.

  52. linuxwolf


  53. Kev

    I don't like it, but I'm abstaining from a veto.

  54. Kev

    Have you both read this now

  55. MattJ

    cat fmuc.xml | sed 's/proxy/mirror/g'

  56. Kev


  57. stpeter


  58. linuxwolf

    I have, and yes, DMUC3 looks a lot like a FMUC

  59. MattJ

    Now, it *does* have some differentiating text

  60. MattJ

    So I'm just going to assume they used FMUC as a base as it was closest to what they wanted

  61. Kev

    (I note that we now have an implementation of FMUC, and I have updates to do once I'm not 'on holiday' in the new year accordingly)

  62. stpeter

    MattJ: so it seems

  63. MattJ

    But considering the end result is still somewhat the FMUC flow, I'm not sure we need another XEP doing the same thing

  64. Tobias has joined

  65. Hirotaka Sato has joined

  66. linuxwolf

    especially considering FMUC is still experimental

  67. MattJ

    I'd rather the author's feedback on why FMUC doesn't work for them, and how it can be made to work

  68. MattJ


  69. linuxwolf


  70. Tobias


  71. Kev

    Hi Tobias.

  72. stpeter

    MattJ: true, that would be helpful

  73. Kev

    It turns out that FMUC is pretty easy to implement, especially in fire-and-forget mode, so I'm expecting MattJ will be implementing this in Prosody shortly after I update the XEP :)

  74. linuxwolf


  75. Kev

    Then I'll probably call for a move to draft, as we'll have two (hopefully interopping) implementations :)

  76. stpeter

    FWIW, I've been having some chats with people off-list about distributed chat (e.g., doing a better job of defining the requirements)

  77. Kev

    But I have to drastically improve the state of the XEP before then.

  78. MattJ

    Kev, interestingly I already implemented it before you published the XEP :)

  79. Kev

    stpeter: Yes, so've I.

  80. linuxwolf

    so, the action on DMUC3 … reject with a request from the authors to explain what's broken in FMUC?

  81. MattJ

    But without the remote MUC sending just one stanza per event to the proxy

  82. Kev

    MattJ: So...isn't that MUC, then? :)

  83. MattJ

    The problem with FMUC is that it requires the primary MUC to support it

  84. Kev

    Ah, right.

  85. MattJ

    Kev, well if s2s went down, the users could still chat locally

  86. Kev


  87. Kev

    This doesn't need any extra protocol work, to do it your way.

  88. MattJ


  89. Lance Stout has joined

  90. MattJ

    linuxwolf, I agree

  91. Kev

    It doesn't cover the use cases for (F|D)MUC, though :)

  92. Kev

    Well, not some of them, anyway.

  93. MattJ


  94. Kev

    linuxwolf: That seems reasonable to me.

  95. stpeter

    I've also reached out to the folks at http://www.cococorp.com/ -- they have an implementation of XMPP over NORM (RFC 5740) that seems to be quite interesting and I would like to make sure that anything that's defined for link-local-ish chat would work with distributed chatrooms (I have a sense that this would be the case for FMUC, but I'm not sure yet)

  96. Kev

    As someone abstaining :D

  97. Kev

    stpeter: Ok.

  98. linuxwolf

    ok, I'll take the responsibility of rejecting DMUC3 then (-:

  99. linuxwolf

    I'll get something on the list before the end of the week

  100. Kev


  101. Kev

    3) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/ft-metadata.html

  102. Kev

    I don't see any particular reason to reject this.

  103. linuxwolf

    no objections from me

  104. MattJ

    Especially when the examples mention my party

  105. MattJ


  106. Kev

    Incidentally, does anyone mind that my flow is usually: Present item Express my opinion

  107. Tobias

    how does it and file transfer thumbnails work together?

  108. Tobias

    isn't that metadata too?

  109. Kev

    It occurs to me that this could potentially be considered leading the discussion the way the Chair wants it.

  110. MattJ

    Kev, nope, go ahead :)

  111. Kev

    Equally, I consider you all sufficiently independent to not be put off by it ;)

  112. MattJ

    I pay more attention to linuxwolf, I agree with everything he says

  113. Kev


  114. linuxwolf

    Kev: I'll call you out if I think there's over bias (-:

  115. Kev

    Tobias: It is, yes.

  116. stpeter

    thumbnails = http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0264.html

  117. linuxwolf


  118. MattJ


  119. Kev

    Tobias: I don't *think* it conflicts with that - do you think it does?

  120. Kev

    Or are you suggesting they should be rolled together?

  121. Lance Stout has left

  122. Lance Stout has joined

  123. Tobias

    Kev, right...the reference to the thumbnail could be included in the metadata form as a field

  124. linuxwolf

    I'd prefer we figure out a way to add things without rolling all of these meta-data things into one über-meta-spec

  125. stpeter

    yay, über-meta!

  126. linuxwolf

    but I'd not object to rolling everything together

  127. Kev

    So, what's the tone here? Accept it and extend it for other extensions, or reject for not being complete?

  128. Kev

    I'm on the first of these.

  129. linuxwolf

    especially considering that thumbnail is currently deferred

  130. linuxwolf


  131. linuxwolf


  132. Tobias

    Kev, pidgin transfers thumbnails via bits of binary

  133. stpeter

    linuxwolf: it was deferred mostly because we were waiting to finish the other FT specs

  134. linuxwolf

    I'd accept as is, and work in extensions by draft

  135. stpeter

    linuxwolf: wfm

  136. Tobias


  137. Kev

    Does anyone disagree with this?

  138. Tobias

    i'm all okay for accepting it as experimental

  139. MattJ

    I agree with linuxwolf

  140. Kev


  141. Kev

    4) 47 to Final

  142. Kev

    Which I think means 47 Last Call.

  143. Kev


  144. Kev


  145. MattJ


  146. linuxwolf


  147. Tobias


  148. stpeter

    those Final XEPs are so lonely, they need some more friends...

  149. MattJ


  150. Kev

    Ok. Peter gets to issue a CFE then. Lucky Peter :)

  151. linuxwolf

    let's make sure every t is dotted and i is crossed, though (-:

  152. Kev


  153. Kev

    5) 292 to Draft

  154. Kev

    I think this is premature.

  155. stpeter

    I won't issue the CFE until January

  156. stpeter

    oh yes 292 to Draft is premature, maybe I mentioned it to figure out how we can get it to Draft eventually -- sorry about that

  157. Kev

    We already have a widely deployed vCard standard. It's icky and may well be Wrong, but I think advancing 292 until there's implementation experience seems premature.

  158. Tobias

    isn't that even implemented somewhere vCard4 over XMPP?

  159. Tobias


  160. linuxwolf

    Tobias: not yet, that I'm aware of

  161. Kev

    Tobias: No, but if Peter says I misread his intention, we can move along :)

  162. MattJ

    Link Mauve has a module for Prosody, but it's experimental at the moment

  163. Tobias


  164. Kev

    5) 45 1.25.

  165. MattJ


  166. Kev

    I'd like to do this next year.

  167. linuxwolf


  168. linuxwolf

    I need to re-read it again

  169. MattJ

    I read the whole thing last night... :)

  170. stpeter

    yeah it's rather large

  171. Kev

    As I'm 'on holiday' until then, and would rather not spend my time off reading all of 45.

  172. stpeter

    MattJ: good for you :)

  173. MattJ

    last "morning" night

  174. stpeter

    Kev: fully agree!

  175. Kev

    Ok. So we're agreed to discuss it next year then, fab.

  176. Kev

    7) Date of next meeting.

  177. Kev

    January 4th, 5pm GMT?

  178. MattJ


  179. linuxwolf

    -1; other commitments

  180. Kev


  181. MattJ


  182. Tobias


  183. linuxwolf

    I can do 1/3 @ 17:00 UTC

  184. stpeter

    I'll likely be slammed on the 4th with IESG reading

  185. linuxwolf checks calendar some more

  186. MattJ

    stpeter, the IESG doesn't take a holiday for Christmas? :)

  187. stpeter

    11th is fine with me

  188. stpeter

    MattJ: we do, sort of, but we have a big telechat on the 5th

  189. linuxwolf

    I'll have to get back to you about the 11th … I have a standing meeting at that time, but my participation is not always mandatory

  190. linuxwolf

    Wednesdays and Thursdays are very meeting heavy for me

  191. Kev

    Should we be doing a different day, then?

  192. stpeter can attest to linuxwolf's meeting madness

  193. Kev

    I would rather neither Monday or Friday, but Tuesday seems generally doable for me.

  194. linuxwolf

    I was able to do 16:00 UTC … 17:00UTC is 10:00 MST, which is when everyone else schedules their meetings /-:

  195. stpeter

    Tuesday is better than Wednesday for me, at least through the end of March

  196. Kev

    linuxwolf: Ah, so it's all Tobias's fault. That makes sense.

  197. linuxwolf

    Tuesdays are better, although I'd likely miss every 3rd meeting

  198. linuxwolf


  199. Tobias

    i could do tuesdays too

  200. Kev

    Tuesday 3rd January 1700?

  201. linuxwolf


  202. Kev

    (With a plan to make this the regular slot)

  203. Tobias


  204. MattJ


  205. Kev


  206. linuxwolf


  207. Kev

    8) Any other business?

  208. MattJ

    Not here

  209. stpeter

    although the 4th would be an appropriate date for a meeting, given that Jer released jabberd on January 4, 1999 ;-)

  210. linuxwolf

    so we'll celebrate the eve of the release (-:

  211. Kev


  212. linuxwolf

    no aob from me

  213. Kev

    Ok, I tihnk we're done.

  214. Kev

    Thanks all

  215. stpeter updates the calendar

  216. Kev

    Consider yourselves gavelbanged.

  217. linuxwolf


  218. linuxwolf


  219. Tobias


  220. Tobias

    stpeter, btw: do you wheter MSFT's OAuth2 authentication for their XMPP interface is using the new OAuth SASL mechanism http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-00.txt ?

  221. Tobias

    i have the feeling not but i thought you might know more

  222. stpeter

    Tobias: I am not sure, but I can inquire

  223. stpeter

    I also want to find out if they have plans for s2s

  224. Tobias

    i mean if they decide on OAuth it'd a nice move of them to go along with that draft or if it's not what they want discuss it with the authors of that draft

  225. Lance Stout has left

  226. stpeter

    MattJ: thanks for the MUC notes

  227. MattJ


  228. stpeter

    Tobias: indeed :)

  229. Lance Stout has joined

  230. stpeter

    Tobias: ok I've pinged one of my MS contacts

  231. Tobias


  232. stpeter goes back to reviewing the issues at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1 :(

  233. Hirotaka Sato has left

  234. ralphm has joined

  235. ralphm has left

  236. Lance Stout has left

  237. stpeter

    ok, that's done! :)

  238. stpeter

    IRIs are the bane of my existence

  239. MattJ

    I read "IRS" at first

  240. stpeter


  241. stpeter

    I haven't had trouble with the IRS in quite some time

  242. Zash has joined

  243. Zash has left

  244. MattJ has left

  245. linuxwolf has left

  246. linuxwolf has joined

  247. MattJ has joined

  248. linuxwolf has left

  249. linuxwolf has joined

  250. stpeter has left

  251. stpeter has joined

  252. linuxwolf has left

  253. Kev has left