XMPP Council - 2012-03-07

  1. Tobias has left

  2. Tobias has joined

  3. Tobias has left

  4. Tobias has joined

  5. Tobias has left

  6. bear has joined

  7. bear has left

  8. linuxwolf has joined

  9. linuxwolf has left

  10. linuxwolf has joined

  11. bear has joined

  12. Kev has left

  13. linuxwolf has left

  14. Tobias has joined

  15. Tobias has left

  16. Tobias has joined

  17. Kev has left

  18. linuxwolf has joined

  19. Kev has left

  20. Neustradamus has left

  21. Neustradamus has joined

  22. stpeter has joined

  23. ralphm has joined

  24. ralphm


  25. stpeter

    hallo Ralph!

  26. Kev


  27. Tobias


  28. Kev

    Well remembered, I'm trying to rebuild my router on a USB stick, as the 2.5inch internal hard drive failed and I don't have a spare.

  29. linuxwolf


  30. Kev

    You might ask why I need a Linux router, in addition to my ISP's - and that's because I have vaguely complicated multiple-subnet setups where some subnets can route over NAT over a VPN into Isode, while my wife's games machine, the X-Box etc. can't.

  31. Kev

    As well as faking DNS, naturally :)

  32. stpeter


  33. linuxwolf

    actually, I assumed it was because you are a Geek, and have need/want of something more

  34. linuxwolf


  35. ralphm

    stpeter: were you aware of http://sipsimpleclient.com/wiki/DesignXMPP

  36. stpeter

    ralphm: no

  37. ralphm

    Adrian Georgescu passed me a note about Wokkel being chosen for the project.

  38. stpeter


  39. ralphm

    And this appears to be a NLNet thing

  40. stpeter


  41. stpeter

    yeah, they are interested in such projects

  42. MattJ has joined

  43. Tobias

    http://nlnet.nl/project/current.html interesting...they also funded a DNSSEC for Jitsi project

  44. stpeter

    ralphm: is Adrian working on that?

  45. Zash has joined

  46. stpeter notes that they link to the old gatewaying specs

  47. stpeter

    perhaps someday we'll finish those off

  48. ralphm

    stpeter: yes. ag-projects is his thing (note the initials)

  49. ralphm

    stpeter: http://www.nlnet.nl/project/xmpp-sip/ is the NLNet page

  50. stpeter

    thanks for the pointer

  51. Kev


  52. Kev

    Nothing to discuss, so let's abort quickly.

  53. Kev

    1) Roll call.

  54. Kev

    I'm here.

  55. stpeter

    might be related to http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax-00.txt

  56. linuxwolf


  57. MattJ


  58. Tobias


  59. Kev

    And given he's mid conversation, Ralph probably is too :)

  60. Kev

    I'm not wrong about having no agenda items for today am I?

  61. ralphm


  62. linuxwolf

    nothing that I saw

  63. MattJ

    172 perhaps, but we can push it off for a week - I haven't looked at it

  64. Kev

    I thought Peter asked for 172 for next week.

  65. MattJ

    I again assumed no-agenda-no-meeting

  66. Kev

    MattJ: I was quite clear on-list, I think :)

  67. ralphm

    Kev: you're on the internet. Of course you are wrong

  68. MattJ

    I think he probably assumed the same :)

  69. linuxwolf

    ralphm: obviously

  70. Kev

    Ok then.

  71. Kev

    2) Date of next meeting

  72. Kev

    Week today?

  73. linuxwolf


  74. Tobias


  75. ralphm


  76. MattJ


  77. Kev

    3) AOB?

  78. stpeter

    I like to have a meeting, even if it's a no-meeting meeting

  79. stpeter


  80. linuxwolf

    none from me

  81. stpeter

    I got nothin'

  82. MattJ


  83. Tobias


  84. linuxwolf waits for gavel

  85. ralphm

    stpeter: I too like the feeling of having accomplished something :-)

  86. Kev

    Excellent. See you good chaps next week.

  87. Kev

    Thanks all

  88. Kev nags the vabel.

  89. MattJ

    Oh well, I'm fine with anything consistent :)

  90. MattJ

    Otherwise I find it hard to keep up

  91. Kev

    I'm trying to be consistent.

  92. MattJ

    But if we're on Wednesdays and into agenda-free meetings now, I'm fine

  93. MattJ

    You're all just conspiring to confuse me

  94. stpeter update the calendar

  95. Kev

    Thanks Peter.

  96. Zash has left

  97. ralphm

    MattJ: I'm still curious about the confusement. We just meet every week in the same timeslot (now) and sometimes we declare it over pretty soon.

  98. stpeter

    ralphm: I think we did Tuesday for a few weeks

  99. ralphm

    now /that/ was confusing :-D

  100. stpeter


  101. MattJ

    Indeed, apparently it wasn't permanent - I thought it was

  102. MattJ

    My mistake, but confusing

  103. MattJ

    and surely I didn't imagine all the weeks we've skipped meetings due to having nothing on the agenda?

  104. ralphm

    seriously though, thanks to having someone keeping the ics in sync, my exo-corteces take care of the rest.

  105. Kev

    MattJ: No, we've done that in the past. It then occurred to me that maybe it's better to maintain momentum and meet anyway.

  106. MattJ

    Sure, and I probably prefer that too

  107. MattJ

    It's just the transition I can't deal with :)

  108. MattJ

    and I didn't see a conscious decision to change this on the mailing list

  109. Kev

    I suggested, no-one objected.

  110. MattJ

    I guess I missed that

  111. MattJ

    But like I said, I'm fine with it

  112. Kev

    You even replied to the mail in which I suggested it :)

  113. MattJ

    I was waiting for you to say something like that

  114. MattJ sighs

  115. Tobias has left

  116. stpeter


  117. Tobias has joined

  118. Tobias has left

  119. Kev has left

  120. Kev has left

  121. Tobias has joined

  122. Tobias has joined

  123. Tobias has joined

  124. ralphm has left

  125. ralphm has joined

  126. linuxwolf has left