XMPP Council - 2012-07-19

  1. Kev

    Anyone think LC on 308 would be a bad idea?

  2. Kev

    (XEP-Correct)

  3. m&m

    I think it's a bad idea ...

  4. m&m

    … to delay that any longer (-:

  5. Tobias

    Kev, to draft?

  6. Kev

    Right.

  7. Tobias

    would be fine with me...it's not a that complex that and from my view looks okay

  8. Kev

    It's dead simple and we've even got a couple of implementations (Jitsi implemented it too, at least).

  9. Tobias

    nice

  10. m&m

    /nod

  11. Kev

    I know this because they complained that I was still using the pre-Experimental namespace :)

  12. m&m

    would this count as a special session? there is a quorum (-:

  13. Kev

    Heh.

  14. m&m

    haha

  15. Kev

    I'm sure it'll wait until Wednesday - I don't think it's desperately urgent.

  16. m&m

    I was joking (-:

  17. Kev

    Right, but it wasn't an entirely stupid suggestion :)

  18. m&m

    if we (council) ever do something that requires urgency … I will weep for civilization

  19. Kev

    Quite.

  20. Kev

    Right, thanks chaps.

  21. Kev

    I'll try to remember to ask for LC next week :)

  22. m&m

    no problem

  23. m&m adds it to the list (-:

  24. stpeter

    good work, guys ;-)

  25. Kev

    I don't understand Mark's aversion to having a new feature for disco - would anyone else mind expressing an opinion, please?

  26. m&m

    I was going to, but it's Mean Thursday and my response was not going to be constructive

  27. m&m

    But I'm still planning to

  28. Kev

    Ta.

  29. stpeter

    :)

  30. Tobias

    interesting...interpreting the reduce of code reuse as charity

  31. m&m

    /grr