ralphmI always find it amusing how highly skilled technical people fail at timezones.
ralphm(and programming VCRs)
Kevralphm: Although everyone above got the right answer.
TobiasKev, maybe we don't fall in the highly skilled technical people category :)
Kev:(
Neustradamushas joined
Tobiashas joined
KevYou know, I think I'm coming up to a third through reviewing 301 already. And it's only been an hour or two.
KevIt's a wonder I didn't find time for this before :s
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas joined
Tobiashas joined
Kev50%. Tearing through!
KevGolly. Security considerations mentions timing attacks based on keypress transmission. I hadn't thought of that, and that's a really fun attack vector :D
Tobiashas joined
bearhas joined
Neustradamushas left
ralphmKev: :-)
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas joined
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas joined
Neustradamushas left
Tobiashas joined
KevI'm not sure that 'refer to the implementations if the spec isn't clear' is a good approach to spec writing!
MattJHeh
KevI'm really not convinced I should need to use their implementation (or even that it's a good idea) to be able to review the XEP.
ralphm+1
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
Neustradamushas joined
Neustradamushas left
Neustradamushas joined
Neustradamushas left
Tobiashas left
Tobiashas joined
KevI've raised the point of using normative language for MUST NOT spam people with RTT if they don't support it. I'd appreciate it if some well-informed people could express an opinion too, please.
m&mhas left
m&mhas joined
bearhas left
bearhas joined
ralphmKev: I'm not entirely sure why this is not obvious.
ralphmKev: We invented disco and pubsub and all that for this.
XMPP Council - 2013-07-02