XMPP Council - 2013-10-02


  1. Lance has left

  2. stpeter has left

  3. Lance has joined

  4. Lance has left

  5. stpeter has joined

  6. stpeter has left

  7. stpeter has joined

  8. stpeter has left

  9. Lance has joined

  10. Tobias has joined

  11. Tobias has left

  12. Lance has joined

  13. Tobias has joined

  14. Lance has joined

  15. Lance has left

  16. Lance has joined

  17. Lance has left

  18. jabberjocke has joined

  19. Tobias has left

  20. Tobias has joined

  21. Kev has left

  22. Tobias has left

  23. Tobias has joined

  24. Kev has left

  25. Kev has left

  26. m&m has joined

  27. m&m has left

  28. m&m has joined

  29. Tobias has left

  30. Tobias has joined

  31. stpeter has joined

  32. stpeter has left

  33. stpeter has joined

  34. Tobias has joined

  35. tato has joined

  36. Tobias has joined

  37. stpeter wanders off briefly to find a better place to sit, bbiaf

  38. stpeter has left

  39. ralphm has joined

  40. stpeter has joined

  41. stpeter has left

  42. stpeter has joined

  43. stpeter

    ah nice, I found a room called "Solace" :-)

  44. ralphm

    :-D

  45. m&m

    T - 5 minutes

  46. Lance has joined

  47. Kev

    And ding.

  48. Kev

    1) Roll call.

  49. Kev

    I'm here!

  50. Tobias too

  51. m&m

    presente

  52. Tobias

    invited mattj

  53. Kev

    Tobias: By just dragging him to the window? :)

  54. ralphm

    here

  55. Tobias

    Kev, how else would one do it? :)

  56. Kev

    Right.

  57. Kev

    But in his absence...

  58. Kev

    2) XEP-0301. Move to Draft?

  59. Kev

    I think everyone's comments have now been addressed and this needs a revote.

  60. Kev

    And I need to give it a re-read first.

  61. stpeter

    it's the re-XEP -- review, revise, repost, reread

  62. m&m

    I did re-read, and I'm +1

  63. Kev

    Excellent.

  64. Tobias

    i'm +1 too, my issue got addressed

  65. m&m

    I'm not going to nit any further; I'll send the list to the XEP editor

  66. m&m

    things like using typographer's quotes

  67. Kev

    m&m: Requiring them to change the English grammar for American was just harsh :p

  68. m&m

    super ultra mega minor

  69. m&m

    ASCII should have been good enough for everyone! (-:

  70. stpeter

    yeah I can clean up some of the minor issues

  71. Kev

    ralphm: ?

  72. ralphm

    Yeah, it looks good to me. +1

  73. Kev

    Fab.

  74. Kev

    I think that was our only voting item.

  75. Kev

    3) Date of next.

  76. m&m

    SBTSBC WFM

  77. Kev

    Excellent.

  78. stpeter updates http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/ in real time

  79. Kanchil

    stpeter: http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/: Twelfth Council – The XMPP Standards Foundation

  80. Kev

    4) AOB.

  81. Tobias

    wfm

  82. stpeter

    OB

  83. Kev

    I have an outstanding +1 from 297, which I'll leave here.

  84. m&m

    the Council and Board nominees are still light

  85. stpeter

    Kev: you are +1 on 297?

  86. Kev

    stpeter: Yes.

  87. stpeter

    Tobias: did you vote on 220?

  88. Tobias

    i'll add mine till the end of the week

  89. Tobias

    stpeter, didn't i reply on list?

  90. stpeter

    Tobias: maybe I missed it

  91. Kev

    Matt and Tobias both said they were intending standing for Council and haven't yet.

  92. Kev

    I don't recall, but I think Ralph said the same?

  93. ralphm

    yes

  94. m&m

    Lance still hasn't completed the form (-:

  95. m&m notes to pester him again

  96. Tobias

    stpeter, you even replied to the mail :)

  97. stpeter

    Tobias: ouch

  98. Tobias

    but you probably replied to a lot mails that day

  99. Tobias

    :)

  100. stpeter

    ah, i see, yes

  101. stpeter

    n/m then

  102. Kev

    m&m: Were you suggesting there's something Council needs to do about the lists standing?

  103. m&m

    just make sure you fill out your nomination if you're running again

  104. m&m

    proxy voting starts in less than a fortnight!

  105. ralphm

    m&m: come on man, I still have 12 days!

  106. Kev

    OK. AOAOB?

  107. ralphm

    m&m: keeping things exciting

  108. stpeter

    voting tally updated again, will process those documents today

  109. m&m

    stpeter: thank you

  110. Kev

    stpeter: Thanks.

  111. stpeter

    sure thing

  112. Kev

    OK, we're done then?

  113. Kev

    Thanks all.

  114. stpeter

    seems so

  115. Kev bangs the gavel.

  116. m&m

    ciao

  117. Tobias

    adiĆ³s

  118. stpeter processes XEPs before his next conference call

  119. ralphm

    thanks!

  120. ralphm

    houdoe!

  121. stpeter

    Tobias: actually, I had advanced XEP-0220 but neglected to update the tally page ;-)

  122. stpeter

    I still don't know why I'm an author in 297 :P

  123. Kev

    I guess Matt added you.

  124. stpeter

    I guess I might remove myself ;-)

  125. Tobias

    hehe

  126. Kev

    stpeter: You're an author because you added yourself in version 0.5, commit 67282456 :)

  127. Kev

    Although I suspect the diff was Matt's, given the changelog.

  128. stpeter

    nod

  129. stpeter

    I wrote the schema

  130. stpeter

    but that's trivial

  131. Kev

    stpeter: If you /want/ to, you can fake other people's authorship of commits in Git.

  132. Kev

    So if people send you a patch, but you have to apply it, you can do so in their name.

  133. stpeter

    true, although I could fake a lot of stuff if I wanted to

  134. Kev

    I meant that this might be a useful thing to fake :)

  135. stpeter

    actually XEP-0297 is missing the registrar section

  136. stpeter adds

  137. ralphm

    Kev: but wait, git has a feature that makes it possible to differentiate between author and committer. No need to fake.

  138. Kev

    ralphm: I don't think you're addressing the use case that I was suggesting.

  139. Kev

    The problem isn't knowing that it was Peter who pushed other people's Git patches. It's knowing who sent the diff when Peter has to apply a diff and create a git commit from it.

  140. Kev

    (Because people send Peter diffs, rather than the result of git format-patch)

  141. Kev

    If people send git format-patch, then all is well with the world.

  142. ralphm

    Kev: git commit --author

  143. Kev

    Indeed. Which is the faking of the author of a commit that I was suggesting Peter does.

  144. Kev

    It would have been quicker to say "I agree with Kev" :D

  145. ralphm

    that's not faking, that's setting the metadata properly

  146. ralphm

    see what I object to?

  147. ralphm

    you call it faking, I am saying this feature was explicitly created for this use case

  148. Kev

    Yes. You're agreeing with me, but arguing with the words I used to express the opinion you agree with :D

  149. ralphm

    Kev: yeah, that's what I do.

  150. ralphm

    Kev: should sound familiar :-D

  151. Kev

    As long as we're agreed on that.

  152. Lance has joined

  153. MattJ has joined

  154. Zash has joined

  155. Zash has left

  156. stpeter has left

  157. Lance has joined

  158. Lance has joined

  159. tato has left

  160. Tobias has left

  161. Tobias has joined

  162. Tobias has left

  163. m&m has left

  164. m&m has joined

  165. Lance has left

  166. Lance has joined

  167. Neustradamus has joined

  168. Tobias has left

  169. Tobias has joined

  170. m&m has left

  171. Tobias has left

  172. Neustradamus has joined

  173. m&m has joined