stpeterwanders off briefly to find a better place to sit, bbiaf
stpeterhas left
ralphmhas joined
stpeterhas joined
stpeterhas left
stpeterhas joined
stpeter
ah nice, I found a room called "Solace" :-)
ralphm
:-D
m&m
T - 5 minutes
Lancehas joined
Kev
And ding.
Kev
1) Roll call.
Kev
I'm here!
Tobiastoo
m&m
presente
Tobias
invited mattj
Kev
Tobias: By just dragging him to the window? :)
ralphm
here
Tobias
Kev, how else would one do it? :)
Kev
Right.
Kev
But in his absence...
Kev
2) XEP-0301.
Move to Draft?
Kev
I think everyone's comments have now been addressed and this needs a revote.
Kev
And I need to give it a re-read first.
stpeter
it's the re-XEP -- review, revise, repost, reread
m&m
I did re-read, and I'm +1
Kev
Excellent.
Tobias
i'm +1 too, my issue got addressed
m&m
I'm not going to nit any further; I'll send the list to the XEP editor
m&m
things like using typographer's quotes
Kev
m&m: Requiring them to change the English grammar for American was just harsh :p
m&m
super ultra mega minor
m&m
ASCII should have been good enough for everyone! (-:
stpeter
yeah I can clean up some of the minor issues
Kev
ralphm: ?
ralphm
Yeah, it looks good to me. +1
Kev
Fab.
Kev
I think that was our only voting item.
Kev
3) Date of next.
m&m
SBTSBC WFM
Kev
Excellent.
stpeterupdates http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/ in real time
Kanchil
stpeter: http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/:
Twelfth Council – The XMPP Standards Foundation
Kev
4) AOB.
Tobias
wfm
stpeter
OB
Kev
I have an outstanding +1 from 297, which I'll leave here.
m&m
the Council and Board nominees are still light
stpeter
Kev: you are +1 on 297?
Kev
stpeter: Yes.
stpeter
Tobias: did you vote on 220?
Tobias
i'll add mine till the end of the week
Tobias
stpeter, didn't i reply on list?
stpeter
Tobias: maybe I missed it
Kev
Matt and Tobias both said they were intending standing for Council and haven't yet.
Kev
I don't recall, but I think Ralph said the same?
ralphm
yes
m&m
Lance still hasn't completed the form (-:
m&mnotes to pester him again
Tobias
stpeter, you even replied to the mail :)
stpeter
Tobias: ouch
Tobias
but you probably replied to a lot mails that day
Tobias
:)
stpeter
ah, i see, yes
stpeter
n/m then
Kev
m&m: Were you suggesting there's something Council needs to do about the lists standing?
m&m
just make sure you fill out your nomination if you're running again
m&m
proxy voting starts in less than a fortnight!
ralphm
m&m: come on man, I still have 12 days!
Kev
OK. AOAOB?
ralphm
m&m: keeping things exciting
stpeter
voting tally updated again, will process those documents today
m&m
stpeter: thank you
Kev
stpeter: Thanks.
stpeter
sure thing
Kev
OK, we're done then?
Kev
Thanks all.
stpeter
seems so
Kevbangs the gavel.
m&m
ciao
Tobias
adiós
stpeterprocesses XEPs before his next conference call
ralphm
thanks!
ralphm
houdoe!
stpeter
Tobias: actually, I had advanced XEP-0220 but neglected to update the tally page ;-)
stpeter
I still don't know why I'm an author in 297 :P
Kev
I guess Matt added you.
stpeter
I guess I might remove myself ;-)
Tobias
hehe
Kev
stpeter: You're an author because you added yourself in version 0.5, commit 67282456 :)
Kev
Although I suspect the diff was Matt's, given the changelog.
stpeter
nod
stpeter
I wrote the schema
stpeter
but that's trivial
Kev
stpeter: If you /want/ to, you can fake other people's authorship of commits in Git.
Kev
So if people send you a patch, but you have to apply it, you can do so in their name.
stpeter
true, although I could fake a lot of stuff if I wanted to
Kev
I meant that this might be a useful thing to fake :)
stpeter
actually XEP-0297 is missing the registrar section
stpeteradds
ralphm
Kev: but wait, git has a feature that makes it possible to differentiate between author and committer. No need to fake.
Kev
ralphm: I don't think you're addressing the use case that I was suggesting.
Kev
The problem isn't knowing that it was Peter who pushed other people's Git patches. It's knowing who sent the diff when Peter has to apply a diff and create a git commit from it.
Kev
(Because people send Peter diffs, rather than the result of git format-patch)
Kev
If people send git format-patch, then all is well with the world.
ralphm
Kev: git commit --author
Kev
Indeed. Which is the faking of the author of a commit that I was suggesting Peter does.
Kev
It would have been quicker to say "I agree with Kev" :D
ralphm
that's not faking, that's setting the metadata properly
ralphm
see what I object to?
ralphm
you call it faking, I am saying this feature was explicitly created for this use case
Kev
Yes. You're agreeing with me, but arguing with the words I used to express the opinion you agree with :D