XMPP Council - 2013-12-04

MattJ, I can also not remind you when the Council meeting doesn't happen, so you'll not get an extra reminder that you don't normally have. That should help.

dave, careful, otherwise i'll ask you to test the videobridge for the board meeting :-p

You're suggesting it'll have the same effect?

you can yell at matt ;-)

Well, I need to not yell at Matt. At precisely the right time.

SO as long as it doesn't work, I could use that.

dave: i'm wondering whether I should my raise my hand...

Depends whether you like writing position papers.

it depends more on whether I need more work ;-)

I'm fairly sure I don't need more work.

Or, at least, I don't recognise what needing more work would look like.

IIRC there is no Council meeting today, right?

right

Correct.

Because I can't make it. Except I probably can, now, but I wasn't going to be able to.

Thanks so much

Oh, you've done that too.

I sent a PM :)

Lance is on a plane to Denver, but that is a moot point as the meeting was already not scheduled

Lance is going to be in Denver?

it's snowing like crazy here, I hope he can land

it's a stop on his way back home

good luck to Lance, then!

it seems that the Council and Board will need to name some liaisons soon

UPnP, ISO TC 122, IEC TC 57

I volunteer. I already work with Craig in ISO TC 122, and was invited to take part in the UPnP WG as well. (Just have to sign and file the 22 page membership contract.)

the liaison agreement is only 10 pages :P

:)

We should probably call for some volunteers, actually, lest we end up with only the usual suspects.

I think some of the usual suspects would be appropriate.

heh

(Not saying exclusively)

Kev, Right, it's more to see if someone interesting crawls from the proverbial woodwork.

Not saying the usual suspects aren't interesting, of course.

will there be a council meeting today?

Peter Waher: none scheduled

ok, is it scheduled for next week?

thought it might be worth mentioning http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/current/msg00397.html -- i basically volunteered an hour ago

Peter Waher: yes

(y)

fippo: volunteered for reviewing the specs? I thought you already reviewed them...

stpeter: you know I always find new errors (-:

yeah, you're good at that

ok, are there any questions or comments regarding the eventlogging or dynamic forms proposals?

somebody mentioned they would return comments on the dynamic forms proposal on list, during last meeting

fippo pointed out the namespace issue, and also with XEP-0331, but we can fix those easily

right. and with those fixed i'm +1

"namespace issue"?

Must have missed a mail

Peter Waher: we don't mint jabber.org namespaces any longer

http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2013-December/028313.html

ah, ok

What namespaces should I use?

"I will work with the authors to mint proper XMPP URNs for these extensions."

ah, I didn't cc standards@

Peter Waher: urn:xmpp:foo stuff - see XEP-0053

so: "urn:xmpp:xdata-color" ok?

and "urn:xmpp:xdata-dynamic" ?

or do you prefer a : instead of - ?

those would be fine

"urn:xmpp:xdata:color" and "urn:xmpp:xdata:dynamic" ?

I don't think it particularly matters whether we use "-" or ":"

(y)

I'll update the proposals and send them to the list

Anything else?

see http://xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html

I wonder if -%29 is legal as a URN segment.

I have the slightest preference for ':'

since we do that for some of the jingle namespaces

(y)

yup..consistency would be nice