XMPP Council - 2013-12-13

kev: jingle-grouping fixed, didn't include rfc example. now for the other one...

Ta.

no minutes yet?

No, I'm going to try to get to them this morning.

Have sympathy for the poor overworked Kev :)

Actually, my meeting's delayed, I'll try to get them done now.

Is the reasoning behind Peter's approach with IM tables correct?

We said a new XEP with discovery would be needed, but did that preclude extending the content allowed in html-im?

my understanding was probably wrong, but I thought we'd go with a new XEP that just said tables are ok to add, and here's a namespace to use in disco to say you support it

Lance: I thought the same.

Lance: there are two issues, I think: 1) HTML-IM should be amended to allow such extensions. 2) Is the default fallback (just rendering the cdata) good enough when requiring disco?

for 2, i'd have to say best effort rendering of the table data into plain text

and that'll have to be good enough, because it gets *very* messy very quickly