-
Dave Cridland
I finally remembered to update my calendar to show the meeting at quarter past the hour.
-
Lance
it is time
-
Lance
0) Roll call
- SamWhited is not here to take notes; sorry.
-
Dave Cridland
Not yet. You're a whole 20 seconds early.
-
Lance
welp
-
Dave Cridland
There we go.
-
Tobias
here
-
Lance
MattJ?
-
Lance
1) Advance Carbons to Draft
-
Lance
I think its time to move this one forward
-
Tobias
+1
-
Dave Cridland
+1.
-
Tobias
i've implemented it a couple days ago for Swift, works nice
-
Lance
+1
-
Lance
2) Date of next
-
Lance
sbtsbc?
-
Tobias
wfm
-
SamWhited
Please do me a favor and file an issue on the xeps repo or something for the editors if we need to move carbons forward; thanks!
-
Lance
SamWhited: will do, thanks!
-
Lance
3) AOB?
-
Dave Cridland
Same time is good.
-
Tobias
none here
-
Dave Cridland
There's some stuff about IoT floating about.
-
Tobias
what stuff?
-
Dave Cridland
Someone's emailed Board about it, and Arc noted that there's a few parallel (and incompatible) IoT suites using XMPP.
- SamWhited thinks someone should add an IoT Compliance Suite to XEP-0375
-
Dave Cridland
It'd be interesting to try and spark a discussion about IoT on standards - but I have to admit the subject doesn't interest me a huge amount, so if anyone else wants to try to lead a discussion that'd be awesome.
-
MattJ
Late +1 for Carbons
-
Lance
Thanks MattJ
-
Lance
Dave Cridland: what would that conversation be about, exactly?
-
Dave Cridland
The other thing is I've noticed a couple of Internet Drafts knocking about using XMPP; I'm beginning to wonder about talking with the IETF/IESG about a formal liasion process to try an give these a reasonable amount of exposure and review.
-
Dave Cridland
Lance, "IoT. Great, innit?"
-
MattJ
Dave Cridland, how many of the incompatible suites are standardized by the XSF?
-
Dave Cridland
Lance, Mostly trying to find out whether people like those specs, and if not, what are they using.
-
Dave Cridland
MattJ, None. The IoT XEPs aren't standards yet. :-)
-
Tobias
Dave Cridland, because these internet drafts people won't come to the XSF, so we need to come to them?
-
Dave Cridland
Tobias, I don't know they're aware, mostly.
-
Dave Cridland
Tobias, I might just ask Alexey to nudge them our way.
-
Tobias
ah.ok
-
Lance
Anything actionable for council then?
-
Tobias
doesn't look like it
-
Dave Cridland
Lance, Probably not, as long as people don't object to me looking at the IETF thing?
-
Lance
Please do, that would be helpful
- Lance bangs gavel
-
Lance
thanks all
-
Tobias
thank you
-
Lance
and pending peter's +1, congrats to all for a new draft xep
-
MattJ
Yay
-
psa
hey sorry, I'm at a conference manning a booth and it all started a bit earlier than expected this morning
-
psa
it would be nice if http://xmpp.org/about/xmpp-standards-foundation#council had links to the mailing list archives and room logs - will generate a pull request
- psa reads http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2016-06-15/
-
psa
I will review the Carbons XEP and post on list
-
psa
re IoT, I am working in that area now (not using XMPP, though!) so I can provide some input
-
psa
Dave Cridland: regarding the XMPP-related work in the IETF, I'd be happy tp reach out to the relevant ADs
-
psa
Dave Cridland: in general, the IETF prefers not to set up a formal liaison relationship unless things are broken; perhaps they're broken right now, but I think not irreparably
-
Dave Cridland
psa, I think it's just L3VPN (who have some reviews now anyway, so moot point) and MILE, but it's worth reminding the IESG that reviews are available and will be enthusiastically given.
-
psa
Dave Cridland: totally agree