XMPP Council - 2016-07-27

  1. MattJ

    .

  2. Tobias

    :

  3. MattJ

    ∴

  4. ralphm

    ⁘

  5. SamWhited

    ⁙

  6. ralphm

    ⸽

  7. Dave Cridland

    ·⃨⃛

  8. Dave Cridland

    (Also, may be distracted during Council as I've another call (OASIS) at the same time).

  9. SamWhited

    This room has turned into an Erlang REPL

  10. MattJ

    Dave Cridland, it's a mirage

  11. ralphm

    I'm sorry, Dave Cridland, you've been disqualified.

  12. Dave Cridland

    For writing text instead of ever increasing numbers of dots?

  13. Dave Cridland

    Or for using combining characters?

  14. ralphm

    both

  15. Dave Cridland

    Didn't find a single codepoint with 7 dots, so used a · with a combining character each for superscript and subscript ellipsis.

  16. psa

    I'm here but I'm on another call too.

  17. Dave Cridland

    psa isn't on the same call as me though. Mine's an OASIS one about TEH CYBER.

  18. psa

    yeah different call

  19. Lance

    it is time

  20. Lance

    0) Roll call

  21. SamWhited notates

  22. Tobias

    here

  23. psa

    here

  24. MattJ

    here

  25. Lance

    I'm not seeing anynew agenda items to vote on today

  26. Tobias

    aside of last weeks votes

  27. Lance

    There is a note from Sam that we should mention a Stack Overflow documentation project

  28. Tobias

    aside from last weeks votes

  29. Lance

    http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/xmpp

  30. SamWhited

    Yup, yup, just wanted to put it on peoples radard. Seems interesting, and might be a good place for documentation.

  31. SamWhited

    or for community building.

  32. Lance

    1) Date of next

  33. Lance

    sbtsbc?

  34. Tobias

    wfm

  35. MattJ

    wfm

  36. psa

    wfm

  37. Lance

    2) AOB?

  38. SamWhited

    Date of next set for 2016-08-03 at 1500 UTC in the minutes.

  39. SamWhited

    The Trello has a 0300 LC card; is that still active?

  40. SamWhited

    Oh, that might have some oustanding changes, moving that to the editors column, nevermind.

  41. Tobias

    i've made those changes

  42. Lance

    Tobias psa: so 300 is ready now for a LC?

  43. Tobias

    I think I addressed the issues brought up by psa

  44. SamWhited

    If PSA agrees I'll try to actually merge thoe today; if not today, then "soon".

  45. Lance

    Ok, then we'll put 300 on the agenda for next week

  46. Lance

    AOAOB?

  47. Tobias

    none here

  48. Lance bangs gavel

  49. MattJ

    None

  50. Lance

    thanks all

  51. MattJ

    Thanks Lance, and SamWhited

  52. MattJ

    SamWhited, SO Docs looks good. Can't imagine it becoming an official XSF outlet, but it would be good to have knowledgeable people contribute

  53. MattJ

    Only other thought is that we might want to steer it towards higher-level "how to use library X to do Y" topics, instead of half-repeating low-level stuff that's already in specs

  54. SamWhited

    MattJ: Agreed; some of my stuff was basically just trying to reword what the spec said and someone pointed that out.

  55. psa

    yes on 300

  56. SamWhited

    But this is a coding site at heart, so it probably makes sense to have mostly examples of how to do things with different libraries; sleek and strophe and the like.

  57. SamWhited

    psa: Ack; I'll get that merged as soon as I can.

  58. SamWhited

    Although I like the idea of doing examples of exchanges in XML or flowchart form as well (alongside more concrete examples using existing libraries)

  59. psa

    thanks, Sam!!