-
ralphm
I'm pretty sure we set that limit to deal with council members note voting in a timely matter.
-
ralphm
*not voting*
-
Kev
Indeed.
-
Kev
So if anyone fails to vote in a reasonable time, it's counted as DNV.
-
Tobias
we also used to have a table showing who voted how when and who failed to vote etc
-
ralphm
Tobias: yeah, that was great
-
Tobias
basically watining for https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/185
-
SamWhited
Tobias *highfive* for teamwork! (That was fast; I went to add a card about the 0233 LC feedback and voting, and one was already there!)
-
Tobias
^5
-
moparisthebest
SamWhited, don't forget to move 368 to draft at your earliest convenience :)
-
SamWhited
moparisthebest: I looked and I don't think it's actually been two weeks since the last version; I'm not 100% sure though, so I figured I'd just give Link Mauve some time to -1 if he wants too.
-
moparisthebest
the last version was 2017-02-15, the vote was 2017-02-22, but yea I have no problem with that
-
Kev
Should be that if there are changes during LC, Council votes on the new version.
-
Kev
Or changes after the Council vote, whatever.
-
moparisthebest
yea council voted on the latest LC changes
-
Kev
The version that Council votes on is the version that gets to Draft, and Council have 2 weeks from the meeting to vote.
-
SamWhited
moparisthebest: right, if the vote was on the 22nd, then Link Mauve's last day to vote is the 8th of this month
-
moparisthebest
ah yea, I obviously can't count weeks
-
SamWhited
(no worries, I was only thinking it had been two weeks because I was confusing the 22nd with the 2nd…)
-
SamWhited
Close enough.