XMPP Council - 2017-05-10

  1. daniel

    Hi. We decided last week that we are having a meeting despite Tobias not being here

  2. daniel

    So who is?

  3. Dave Cridland

    Hiya.

  4. SamWhited

    o/

  5. daniel

    sorry by the way for sending out the minutes for last week 15 minutes ago

  6. SamWhited

    Sounds like daniel is volunteering to chair :)

  7. daniel

    Link Mauve?

  8. Link Mauve

    Oh, yes, I’m here.

  9. daniel

    great. any volunteers for the minutes?

  10. SamWhited

    I can do it

  11. daniel

    awesome

  12. daniel

    3) sha-1 updates

  13. daniel

    Link Mauve?

  14. Link Mauve

    Still none.

  15. daniel

    Ok

  16. daniel

    so i guess that brings us directly to date of next

  17. daniel

    I'm actually going to be on a train... but it will have wifi I guess...

  18. SamWhited

    2017-05-17T16:00Z?

  19. daniel

    so may 17th 1500Z?

  20. SamWhited

    1500? Can I not DST? (I probably can't DST)

  21. Link Mauve

    15:00Z, yes.

  22. daniel

    in any case same time as today

  23. SamWhited

    oh yah, huh, thought I was 6 hours off. Nevermind.

  24. SamWhited

    2017-05-17T15:00Z WFM

  25. daniel

    5) AOB

  26. SamWhited

    Peter Waher's email from this morning; we should probably get a response to him quickly.

  27. Dave Cridland

    SamWhited, ?

  28. SamWhited

    TL;DR he wants the IP rights that he assigned to the XSF back for the IoT XEPs

  29. SamWhited

    He sent an email to council@ and editor@ just before the meeting

  30. Dave Cridland

    SamWhited, Oh. Your morning. I don't see these.

  31. SamWhited

    oh right, sorry; morning in UGT

  32. daniel

    i don't have any email either...

  33. daniel

    maybe it just went to editor?

  34. Link Mauve

    I don’t have it.

  35. Dave Cridland

    So anyway, that's neither an Editor nor a Council issue.

  36. Dave Cridland

    Punt it to Board?

  37. SamWhited

    Weird; it shows up in editor and council for me

  38. SamWhited

    Dave Cridland: Makes sense; should we provide a recommendation for board?

  39. SamWhited

    I guess it's not a technical matter, so maybe not

  40. Dave Cridland

    SamWhited, Well, my personal view is that he can't have the rights back.

  41. Link Mauve

    SamWhited, he probably doesn’t have the rights to send to council@?

  42. SamWhited

    Link Mauve: Oh, is that a thing? Makes sense, I'll reforward it and CC board

  43. Dave Cridland

    SamWhited, He does have a license, of course, but taking the rights back would mean the XSF could no longer publish it, which seems frustratingly difficult.

  44. SamWhited

    Dave Cridland: Yah, I agree with you; I don't like the idea of us having to take it down and having a gap in the XEPs on the website, etc.

  45. SamWhited

    Forwarded to council@ and board@

  46. daniel

    I actually have aob myself. I was wondering on the progress of ISR. are there any news regarding contacting the ietf Dave Cridland?

  47. Dave Cridland

    Ah, I see... He thinks that retraction means he gets the IPR back.

  48. Dave Cridland

    daniel, No, largely my fault, for not following up with Board.

  49. daniel

    ok thanks.

  50. daniel

    anything else?

  51. daniel

    I guess not. so thank you guys

  52. daniel

    and thanks SamWhited for writing the minutes

  53. SamWhited

    thanks!