XMPP Council - 2017-06-07


  1. Tobias

    seems it's about time

  2. Link Mauve

    Hello, it’s 15:00Z.

  3. Tobias

    1) Roll call

  4. Link Mauve

    o/

  5. SamWhited

    Here

  6. daniel

    Hi

  7. Tobias

    IIRC Dave Cridland is excused

  8. Tobias

    2) Minute taker

  9. SamWhited

    (I am only half-here, FYI)

  10. Link Mauve

    I can do it.

  11. Tobias

    Link Mauve, thanks

  12. Tobias

    SamWhited, what's the state of getting a inbox mail about Compare-And-Publish PubSub Items?

  13. SamWhited

    I haven't been merging anything again, I need to get back into the habbit, but that would require figuring out how docker publishing works and writing it down so I don't forget again, so I'ev been lazy. Apologies.

  14. Tobias

    alright..no worries

  15. Tobias

    3) OMEMO / ODR

  16. Tobias

    I've started a summary of the recent discussions around OMEMO and the possible solutions on the table, will hopefully get done with that today or tomorrow and send it to standards list

  17. Tobias

    4) XEP-0280 changes ( https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/434 )

  18. Kev

    I note that on that topic (OMEMO), I *think* there's a proposal on the table that (while a heavy compromise for everyone) has at least Remko, daniel and me thinking it's manageable. I'm somewhat keen that we don't move backwards now :)

  19. Tobias

    Kev started a discussion 6 days ago on standards

  20. Tobias

    Kev, i know and I'll emphasise that in the summary

  21. Kev

    :)

  22. Link Mauve

    Kev, the document the existing, improve what can be improved there, and publish another version which is what we suggest should be implemented in the future?

  23. Link Mauve

    Kev, document the existing, improve what can be improved there, and publish another version which is what we suggest should be implemented in the future?

  24. Tobias

    (if that is the one where current numbered XEP will be moving/ongoing with development, and a new historical XEP will document the current deployed code), haven't gone through all mails in my inbox yet

  25. Kev

    Within the same XEP. Yes. (assuming you're talking about OMEMO still)

  26. Link Mauve

    Tobias, I’d really welcome a summary, I haven’t been able to read the thread yet.

  27. Kev

    Tobias: No, it's that no Historical is published.

  28. Link Mauve

    (Yes.)

  29. Tobias

    Kev, alright..then that's probably covered in the mails i haven't read yet

  30. SamWhited

    I got lost on that thread a long time ago; looking forward to the summary.

  31. Tobias

    5) SHA-1 migration plan

  32. Tobias

    I think Dave put something along that on his todo, nothing new to report here

  33. Link Mauve

    Nothing new here either, but I fully agree with the conclusion from the minutes.

  34. Tobias

    there's an agenda to vote on the OMEMO XEP update but i imagine at least some on the council are waiting on my summary so i suggest we vote on that next week

  35. daniel

    Ack

  36. SamWhited

    Yah, I'd like to wait for a summary; I'll also ping Andy to comment again, I think he wants to stay out of it, but I'd like to get his opinion on some of the new stuff if he can be convinced.

  37. Tobias

    there is also voting on obsoleting XEP-0146: Remote Controlling Clients on the agenda, but according to https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#approval-info the next step is Deprecated, for an Active Informational XEP

  38. Tobias

    so, do we want to vote on deprecating it?

  39. SamWhited

    > A XEP of any type is changed from Deprecated to Obsolete if the XMPP Council has determined that the protocol defined therein should no longer be implemented or deployed.

  40. SamWhited

    Seems like we should go straight to obsolete to me; we want to say "don't deploy this, there are security issues"

  41. Tobias

    SamWhited, so you suggest we directly vote on obsoleting it

  42. Tobias

    alright

  43. SamWhited

    That would be my suggestion

  44. Kev

    I don't see a process problem with this.

  45. Tobias

    6) Vote on obsoleting XEP-0146: Remote Controlling Clients

  46. Kev

    There's no minimum period for deprecated (that I can remember), so you're eventually just voting to deprecated and then immediately voting to obsolete.

  47. Kev

    s/eventually/essentially/

  48. Tobias will vote on list

  49. SamWhited

    +1 to obsolete

  50. Link Mauve

    +1 to obsolete, which was my original intent last year.

  51. daniel

    +1 obsolete

  52. Link Mauve

    Thanks for bringing that up daniel. :)

  53. Tobias

    7) Date of next

  54. Tobias

    usual time, next Wednesday?

  55. SamWhited

    WFM

  56. Tobias too

  57. daniel

    Me too

  58. Link Mauve

    WFM.

  59. Tobias

    great

  60. Tobias

    8) AOB

  61. daniel

    Me

  62. Tobias

    sure, what's it?

  63. daniel

    Council will eventually have to vote on the publish options thing I keep pushing on the list

  64. daniel

    So unless you all plan to vote 0 you might want to get involved

  65. Tobias

    right

  66. daniel

    That would spare me from having to rewrite the PR again and again

  67. daniel

    That's it

  68. Tobias

    okido

  69. Tobias

    further AOB

  70. Tobias

    ?

  71. SamWhited

    Yah, sorry, I keep meaning to comment on that; I really need to get a better handle on pubsub first.

  72. Tobias

    seems there's no further AOB

  73. Tobias bangs the gavel

  74. Tobias

    thanks everybody

  75. Link Mauve

    Thank you. :)

  76. Tobias

    seems it'll be an evening full of mailbox reading