XMPP Council - 2018-07-25

jonasw, I'm being slow on the agenda - it's just PR 681 and ProtoXEP fsn I can see, is that right?

jonasw, Oh... Wait. We're not meeting today are we? Never mind!

#682 will also need council for half of it, fyi.

Author for the other one.

But they are the same change.

Link Mauve, > + <p>Alternatively, the proxy may be exposed directly on the Requester’s server, in which case it use Service Discovery on this domain, like for every previous disco#items results.</p> -EGRAMMAR

can you fix that pls?

There is a grammar issue in this sentence?

Link Mauve, "it *can* use"? "it *must* use"?

at least "it use" -> "it uses"

Oh. >_<

Link Mauve, Or "it use*s*".

but I think there should be a verb inbetween

Should probably.

(it is in both commits btw)

why not MUST?

Ah no, “needs”.

Hmm…

(Yes, this was a copy/paste.)

jonasw, abuse of 2119 in every sentence wasn’t the trend back when 0065 was written.

"needs to use" then ✏

"RFC 2119 in not a stick with which to beat people", as Pete Resnick once said.

(In response to a later review of what became https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4469, when Randy Gellens noticed it didn't use RFC 2119 at all)

Fixed the grammar.