XMPP Council - 2018-09-19

  1. Zash


  2. Ge0rG

    Sooner than yesterday in any case

  3. Zash

    Timezones, how do they work*

  4. Zash

    Timezones, how do they work?

  5. SamWhited

    driving and may be a tiny bit late or unrespinsive, shouldn't be too long though

  6. Ge0rG

    !summon Dave

  7. SamWhited

    Perfect; I am off the road and responsive again!

  8. daniel


  9. Ge0rG

    It looks like we have no Kev and no Dave, so we are 3/5. Do we have an agenda volunteer?

  10. Ge0rG

    #1 Is it Role Call or Roll Call?

  11. Ge0rG

    We have Sam, Daniel and Georg. Kev promised to probably skip this one, if my log doesn't lie.

  12. Ge0rG

    No wait, my log is a lie. Or rather, it's way too old.

  13. Ge0rG

    Do we have Agenda items?

  14. SamWhited

    I haven't seen any new protoxeps come in

  15. daniel

    Allegedly there is stuff on the github

  16. SamWhited


  17. daniel

    But I didn't verify it

  18. SamWhited

    Yah, I have no recollection of which of these have been covered or not

  19. jonas’

    Guus’ PR wasn’t

  20. jonas’

    it was discussed, but Guus made updates to it

  21. jonas’

    the XEP-0198 one

  22. Ge0rG


  23. jonas’

    (discussed and rejected back then)

  24. jonas’

    (but now changes)

  25. jonas’

    that one, exactly, thanks, Ge0rG

  26. guus.der.kinderen

    (hargh, I got disconnected from this muc again. Please disregard my last comment, if it came through)

  27. Ge0rG

    I like the changes (I think I liked the old one as well), but it's got typos: "to" instead of "too"

  28. SamWhited

    guus.der.kinderen: I don't think it did, you're safe :)

  29. daniel

    I'm still in favor of that one. (I was the one who suggested it in the first place)

  30. guus.der.kinderen

    Yup, Daniel made me do it.

  31. Ge0rG

    guus.der.kinderen: would you fix the "too"s?

  32. guus.der.kinderen

    Ge0rG: what's that? Spelling?

  33. jonas’


  34. Ge0rG

    so we have... #3 Items for voting: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579 "Add handled-count-too-high specification"

  35. Ge0rG

    +1 with the typos fixed.

  36. guus.der.kinderen

    Ge0rG: will fix

  37. daniel


  38. daniel

    I switched to desktop and the messages I sent from there don't arrive...

  39. daniel


  40. daniel


  41. SamWhited

    I'm +1 as well if we're making this official; this makes good sense

  42. Ge0rG

    Great. I suppose Kev and Dave will on-list then.

  43. guus.der.kinderen

    To/too fixed.

  44. daniel


  45. Ge0rG

    daniel: there it is

  46. daniel

    Well at least sm works

  47. Ge0rG

    https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/591 "XEP-0050 Ad-Hoc Commands: Clarify 'execute' actions equivalence" was VETOed according to the Table Of Doom, as was the competing #598. Anybody remembers what the next steps with those are?

  48. SamWhited

    I think we just close it and if the author wants to change things and submit a new PR that's fine. Did we have feedback? I vaguely remember that having more optional stuff didn't feel good, but don't remember the specifics

  49. Ge0rG

    In February, Kev suggested to do a rewording of the text to make the intention clear.

  50. SamWhited

    Seems like we can close it to clean up the PRs with a note about that then, I'll leave something.

  51. SamWhited

    Oh, I was about to say "wait, there is a new protoxep, how did I miss this?" but daniel just submitted it

  52. Ge0rG

    Sorry, looks like my desktop client got DoSed by presence.

  53. Ge0rG

    So it's over time, we don't have a clean agenda and not much of discussion either. Wrap it up and aim for +1W?

  54. daniel


  55. Ge0rG

    Our work here is done.

  56. Link Mauve

    guus.der.kinderen, you still have a s/to/too/ to do, here: “by sending an 'h' value that is to high”

  57. Link Mauve

    Also, is is “a undefined-condition” or “an undefined-condition”?

  58. Link Mauve

    Also s/handled-count-to-high/handled-count-too-high/

  59. guus.der.kinderen

    Link Mauve: can you edit the pr? I'm not near my laptop for the rest of the day.

  60. Link Mauve

    Oh wow, I indeed can! :o

  61. Link Mauve

    Never saw that.

  62. Link Mauve

    Their online editor fails the search feature though. ^^'

  63. Link Mauve

    There, done.

  64. guus.der.kinderen