-
Zash
Soon?
-
Ge0rG
Sooner than yesterday in any case
-
Zash
Timezones, how do they work*✎ -
Zash
Timezones, how do they work? ✏
-
SamWhited
driving and may be a tiny bit late or unrespinsive, shouldn't be too long though
-
Ge0rG
!summon Dave
-
SamWhited
Perfect; I am off the road and responsive again!
-
daniel
Hi
-
Ge0rG
It looks like we have no Kev and no Dave, so we are 3/5. Do we have an agenda volunteer?
-
Ge0rG
#1 Is it Role Call or Roll Call?
-
Ge0rG
We have Sam, Daniel and Georg. Kev promised to probably skip this one, if my log doesn't lie.
-
Ge0rG
No wait, my log is a lie. Or rather, it's way too old.
-
Ge0rG
Do we have Agenda items?
-
SamWhited
I haven't seen any new protoxeps come in
-
daniel
Allegedly there is stuff on the github
-
SamWhited
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Needs+Council%22
-
daniel
But I didn't verify it
-
SamWhited
Yah, I have no recollection of which of these have been covered or not
-
jonas’
Guus’ PR wasn’t
-
jonas’
it was discussed, but Guus made updates to it
-
jonas’
the XEP-0198 one
-
Ge0rG
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579
-
jonas’
(discussed and rejected back then)
-
jonas’
(but now changes)
-
jonas’
that one, exactly, thanks, Ge0rG
-
guus.der.kinderen
(hargh, I got disconnected from this muc again. Please disregard my last comment, if it came through)
-
Ge0rG
I like the changes (I think I liked the old one as well), but it's got typos: "to" instead of "too"
-
SamWhited
guus.der.kinderen: I don't think it did, you're safe :)
-
daniel
I'm still in favor of that one. (I was the one who suggested it in the first place)
-
guus.der.kinderen
Yup, Daniel made me do it.
-
Ge0rG
guus.der.kinderen: would you fix the "too"s?
-
guus.der.kinderen
Ge0rG: what's that? Spelling?
-
jonas’
(yes)
-
Ge0rG
so we have... #3 Items for voting: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579 "Add handled-count-too-high specification"
-
Ge0rG
+1 with the typos fixed.
-
guus.der.kinderen
Ge0rG: will fix
-
daniel
Huh
-
daniel
I switched to desktop and the messages I sent from there don't arrive...
-
daniel
Anyway
-
daniel
+1
-
SamWhited
I'm +1 as well if we're making this official; this makes good sense
-
Ge0rG
Great. I suppose Kev and Dave will on-list then.
-
guus.der.kinderen
To/too fixed.
-
daniel
+1
-
Ge0rG
daniel: there it is
-
daniel
Well at least sm works
-
Ge0rG
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/591 "XEP-0050 Ad-Hoc Commands: Clarify 'execute' actions equivalence" was VETOed according to the Table Of Doom, as was the competing #598. Anybody remembers what the next steps with those are?
-
SamWhited
I think we just close it and if the author wants to change things and submit a new PR that's fine. Did we have feedback? I vaguely remember that having more optional stuff didn't feel good, but don't remember the specifics
-
Ge0rG
In February, Kev suggested to do a rewording of the text to make the intention clear.
-
SamWhited
Seems like we can close it to clean up the PRs with a note about that then, I'll leave something.
-
SamWhited
Oh, I was about to say "wait, there is a new protoxep, how did I miss this?" but daniel just submitted it
-
Ge0rG
Sorry, looks like my desktop client got DoSed by presence.
-
Ge0rG
So it's over time, we don't have a clean agenda and not much of discussion either. Wrap it up and aim for +1W?
-
daniel
yes
-
Ge0rG
Our work here is done.
-
Link Mauve
guus.der.kinderen, you still have a s/to/too/ to do, here: “by sending an 'h' value that is to high”
-
Link Mauve
Also, is is “a undefined-condition” or “an undefined-condition”?
-
Link Mauve
Also s/handled-count-to-high/handled-count-too-high/
-
guus.der.kinderen
Link Mauve: can you edit the pr? I'm not near my laptop for the rest of the day.
-
Link Mauve
Oh wow, I indeed can! :o
-
Link Mauve
Never saw that.
-
Link Mauve
Their online editor fails the search feature though. ^^'
-
Link Mauve
There, done.
-
guus.der.kinderen
Tx