dwdLink Mauve, jonas’ - can you two update your bios on the website here, please: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/blob/master/content/pages/about/xmpp-standards-foundation.md - editing directly in Github works well, so it shouldn't take either of you long.
dwdgoffi, If you're about to argue your case for the ProtoXEP, you're more than welcome (and indeed encouraged), but could you do so somewhere more visible (xsf@ perhaps?) in case others want to chip in.
jonas’dwd, it’s on my todo, will do when I’m at home
jonas’I don’t have my credentials with me
Ge0rGdwd, goffi: I'd argue for standards@ instead of a MUC
dwdGe0rG, That would also be good, but sometimes the immediacy of a MUC is useful.
Ge0rGokay, I don't oppose to moving that to xsf@ under the condition that it will be written up to standards@ in the end
Ge0rGI haven't read up the previous discussion on standards@ yet, and I will do so ASAP
goffidwd: no I just came to see the logs, I'll defend the case on xsf mailing list which is the right location in my opinion. But I'm work now, so it's not the right time :)
Ge0rGgoffi: I tend to read up logs on http://logs.xmpp.org/council/
goffiI mean standard mailing list of course
dwdgoffi, Great, thanks.
goffiGe0rG: yes I didn't knew the link, I've found it in the subject (it's probably on the wiki too I suppose).
goffiI'll wait for the minutes first anyway.
GuusI noted that in the last weeks, you considerably structured the way you're doing things
GuusThanks for doing that
GuusWould now perhaps be a good time to include updating https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/records/council-votes/ in your effort?
GuusThere's a huge gap, but if we choose to start record things again, we might be able to fill the gap from history too
GuusI'd love for our work to be more visible - keeping track of votes on the website would help.
Ge0rGGuus: we have a Spreadsheet of Doom from last year's Council