Secretarydwd, I am not sure what you want (what is 'please' supposed to mean?).
dwdSecretary, I shall refrain from politeness now.
Secretarydwd, sorry, I did not understand that.
dwdSecretary, please list all the polls
Secretarydwd, there are 2 open polls
Accept "Cryptographic Hash Function Recommendations for XMPP" to Experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html (due in 1 week, on 2019-02-01)
Accept "Some dummy XEP" to Experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dummy-recommendations.html (due in 1 week, on 2019-02-01)
jonas’dwd, I have a patch thing where it parses protoxep, PR and standards@ urls into nicer things, but I don’t think it’s deployed on the server just yet
dwdjonas’, Sweet. Want to spin it up? I was thinking we'd try it on the meeting this afternoon. I've even managed an agenda.
jonas’dwd, I’ll do it before the meeting
jonas’I’ll clear the data once more, since those polls are stale anyways
jonas’Secretary, delete poll on some dummy xep
Secretaryjonas’, sorry, I do not know which poll you’re referring to
jonas’Secretary, delete poll on some dummy xep to experimental
Secretaryjonas’, deleted poll on Accept "Some dummy XEP" to Experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dummy-recommendations.html
dwdMy current meeting started 20 minutes late - it's a video call, so I'll be able to chip in, but unless it finishes really early I'm not going to be able to chair - can someone else? (Should be a matter of nipping through the agenda at least).
Kevjonas’: Secretary doesn't do agenda-driving yet, does she?
jonas’Kev, not yet
Kevdwd: I can.
dwdNot sure it's a she either.
KevI thought boats were always shes?
dwdPlease don't make me giggle in the middle of a video-call interview.
KevIt was worth it, though.
jonas’dwd, I can’t promise that
jonas’I have a gif stashed which made me laugh while I was in a small (<20p) audience of a talk. don’t ask me why I even clicked that link, but it made me realize that in-line display of stuff in chat windows isn’t always a good thing.
jonas’re agenda: this should be added if possible https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/745#issuecomment-456598472
KevIsn't that premature without the associated schema updates?
Kev1) Who's a bap?
Ge0rGPhew. Just in time
Kevdwd is, I assume, still here?
jonas’Kev, the schema updates are just editorial work in the end
jonas’we need to figure out whether to NS bump or note
Link MauveHi, I’m here but not fully in mind.
jonas’we need to figure out whether to NS bump or not
Link MauveMy father had an infarctus last week and I’ve been quite affected.
Link MauveHe’s ok-ish currently, so no worries. :)
KevNo idea what an infarctus is, but oh dear.
jonas’then hope he gets better then
jonas’and stays healthy
jonas’I’m not good at th is :)
jonas’I’m not good at this :)
KevI don't see a reason not to LC, so +1.
jonas’who requested it, if I may ask?
jonas’or where was it requested?
KevDave put it on the Agenda.
Link Mauveinfarct* apparently.
jonas’is this a mixup with the request for LC of XEP-0335 by MattJ?
jonas’yes it is
jonas’https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/733 the XEP-0355 is from here, but MattJ actually asked for XEP-0335 on the list
Ge0rGDate: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:09:28 +0000
From: Matthew Wild <email@example.com>
To: XMPP Standards <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: [Standards] [XEP-0335] Request for Last Call
KevOk, so cancelling #3 then.
Ge0rGAnd Dave responded with a link to https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/733
Add CORS to 156
jonas’Kev, can we s/355/335/ and have the vote?
Ge0rGKev: could you treat it as a typo and vote?
jonas’it should’ve been on last week’s agenda already
KevI was going to shove it on the end as a new item.
jonas’ah, that’s fine by me
KevI'm +1 on #4
Link MauveSecretary, I’m +1 for #4.
SecretaryLink Mauve, sorry, I did not understand that.
jonas’Secretary, create poll on https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/743
Secretaryjonas’, created poll on [PR#743] XEP-0156: Add implementation notes suggesting CORS
Adding `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` header allows web clients hosted on different domains access connection settings for target servers. This change adds similar suggestion that is already present in [XEP-0363 HTTP Upload]. See: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-January/035645.…
Secretaryjonas’, I recorded your vote of +1 on [PR#743] XEP-0156: Add implementation notes suggesting CORS: (no comment)
SecretaryLink Mauve, I recorded your vote of +1 on [PR#743] XEP-0156: Add implementation notes suggesting CORS: (no comment)
Ge0rGI'm on-list, because CORS headers are a Security, and because just allowing * is probably a dumb idea.
KevGe0rG: Yes, but for 156 * seems fine to me. I could be wrong.
jonas’hm, it only says that in an example, but you’re probably right that everyone will be oding the example thing.
jonas’Kev, if they do it globally on their http host by accident..?
Link MauveGe0rG, it doesn’t require *, it says the exact headers and their value are out of scope for this document, but CORS should be considered.
Ge0rGKev: what jonas’ said
jonas’although, it says explicitly that it should be done for the metadata files only.
Ge0rGLink Mauve: but the example!
Link MauveRight. ^^
Link MauveAccess-Control-Allow-Methods should also be added to the example AIUI, with a value of GET.
KevMoving on, then.
Ge0rG> caption="Example header allowing all sites to read host metadata"
I'd make a FAT BOLD warning in that place.
WiktorGe0rG: what's the risk of exposing metadata through a browser you're thinking of?
KevI thought this was LCd already, I'm losing track, but +1.
Ge0rGKev: calling for last-call?
jonas’+1 on #5
Link MauveSecretary, create poll on https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html
SecretaryLink Mauve, created poll on https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html
Ge0rGWiktor: the risk is of inadvertently setting this header on the whole vhost
jonas’Link Mauve, LMC that to include that it is about an LC for that XEP
WiktorGe0rG: got it
WiktorThat'd be a bad idea indeed :)
Link MauveSecretary, create poll on last call for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html
KevThe bot is cute, but can we quit playing with it until it's ready to use, please? It's just flooding the backlog at the moment and making it hard for me to keep track.
SecretaryLink Mauve, created poll on last call for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html
KevAt least during meetings.
Link Mauve!+1, we need community input on what should be included for 2019, and advance it asap.
SecretaryLink Mauve, sorry, I do not know which poll you mean.
jonas’Kev, okay, whatever works for you. I was assuming we’re giving it a shot since dwd proposed that, but I guess he’s not the chair now :)
Link Mauve!+1 for last call for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html, we need community input on what should be included for 2019, and advance it asap.
SecretaryLink Mauve, I recorded your vote of +1 on last call for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html: //xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html, we need community input on what should be included for 2019, and advance it asap.
Link MauveOh, : and not ,.
jonas’(that should do it for now)
jonas’so to summarize: +1 on #5 (LC for suites) from me
jonas’and I change my +1 on #4 to on-list, because what Ge0rG said
Kev6) LC for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0292.html (vcard4)
jonas’+1 on #6
Link Mauve+1 on #6.
Ge0rG+1 on #6, no need to block an LC
KevThis isn't ready to advance, I think, but no objection to an LC. +0