XMPP Council - 2019-02-13

Do we have agendums for today?

Kev: my protoxeps? 😁

Indeed.

Just those then? dwd?

Sorry, I can't make it. Apologies for short notice.

meta-apologies

Kev, there might be more (editor hat on), but my weekend was virtually nonexistent and I’m still busy with catchup (editor hat off)

I can relate.

'tis time, 'tis time.

1) Roll call

Dave sends apologies.

I’m here

Ge0rG breaks parsers

o/

✏

I'll pretend to be Dave unless anyone objects loudly.

No? Good.

hi dave

Without a formal agenda, I'll go with zinid's three protoXEPs and leave it at that.

2) https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xor.html Accept as Experimental?

17:01:45 Kev> I'll pretend to be Dave unless anyone objects loudly. 17:01:45 Kev> No? Good. That was a very brief ojection time interval.

( Ge0rG 3s here)

The issue with the XSF acting as a CA has been resolved.

Kev, I’m pulling up the diff for anyone interested

https://github.com/xsf/xeps/commit/c0bda7c56786e27d68c718686d34db44b47a1b11

jonas’: is that the sole diff?

that’s the entire diff on xor.xml

Damn. Github sentence-diff is b0rked. I need to on-list that.

I’m on list, too

I still don’t know a bit about RELOAD

I don't know about RELOAD, but this seems to clear the barrier for Experimental for me (I'd have to do a lot of reading before advancing further, but ...).

So I'm +1.

Link Mauve?

I’m +1, I haven’t read more about RELOAD since last week but this is no reason to block advancement to Experimental.

Dave, what's your vote?

*squint*

tldr, I splitted xor into three documents, the xsf is only now required to maintain a redirect to CAs enrollment http servers

Kev, right, reminds me that I should implement displaying csn in Swift. ^^

3) https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/eax.html Accept as experimental?

Link Mauve, still awaiting a PR against Jingle-FT from you first...

jonas’, yup, I know.

zinid: Ta.

on-list. Sorry.

On list too.

+1 I think

Oh, wait, this is Procedural, whoops.

is it?

eax-car is for the board, yes

So I think we should discuss with Board who the approving body should be.

Procedural can be either.

eax is not

eax-car is

jonas’: Right

Ah, sorry, too many tabs.

I think this one was fine, but I should on-list as I've just fluffed my tabs up.

And that means no vote needed on eax-car.

Indeed.

yeah, eax-car probably needs to be forwarded to Board

So I think we're done for today.

4) Date of next

Another job well done.

Good job Dave

+1w wfm, Dave

+1W WFM

I won't be able to do next week, but I'm sure you'll all have fun without me.

5) AOB?

everyone review their open votes

Sounds like "no".

Thanks all.

including myself there

thanks dave

Kev: it looks like there is a missing vote from Kev-you regarding 0410 advancement

If that's last week's, the minutes went out this afternoon, and that's my trigger for list voting.

So I'm hoping to get to my onlists for both last week and today tomorrow.

Kev: Awesome! There is also an excellent Voting Summary by a person named Tedd Sterr.