-
dwd
BTW, I'm assuming nothing for the agenda this afternoon, still. Hence no agenda, which is simple laziness on my part. Link Mauve, please check your outstanding votes.
-
Kev
Given no agenda, I might well be absent.
-
dwd
OK. Ge0rG is absent too, I believe. jonas’ Link Mauve, if either of you can't make it we'll declare a skip.
-
Ge0rG
I might be less absent than anticipated.
-
jonas’
I’ll be here, but possibly a few minutes late
-
jonas’
I got caught up in a work meeting and can only start my commute home now
-
jonas’
.
-
dwd
Tick tick.
-
dwd
1) Who's Here?
-
dwd
I mean, apart from me.
-
Link Mauve
Oh hi, just on time!
-
Link Mauve
Right, votes.
-
dwd
That's... Two.
-
jonas’
I’m here
-
jonas’
just fell into the door✎ -
jonas’
just fell through the door into the flat ✏
-
dwd
Are you OK?
-
jonas’
eh, }s✎ -
jonas’
eh, yes ✏
-
dwd
Anyway, that's Three. So we have quorum.
-
dwd
2) Agenda Bashing
-
jonas’
(it’s a figure of speech (which apparently does not translate well) for when you come home exhausted)
-
dwd
Despite some effort, there was nothing for the agenda, so I didn't bother writing that in an email.
-
dwd
jonas’, I understood, I was merely being obtuse, sorry.
-
jonas’
I’m afraid I’m too exhausted for that ;)
-
jonas’
Editor Hat: I’m sorry that I didn’t get around to push updates to xeps, I had like four minutes between coming home and meeting start ;)
-
jonas’
will take care of that after the meeting
-
dwd
Did I miss anything for the agenda?
-
dwd
Or do we really have nothing?
-
dwd
OK, I'll assume nothing.
-
dwd
3) Items for a vote (NULL)
-
dwd
4) Outstanding Votes
-
dwd
I think it's just Link Mauve for one.
-
dwd
PR #758 - XEP-0060: Expose pubsub#access_model and pubsub#publish_model - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/758
-
jonas’
I think so too, but will double check wtih tedds mail to be sure
-
dwd
Link Mauve, ^^
-
Link Mauve
(I’m looking at it.)
-
dwd
5) AOB
-
dwd
?
-
Link Mauve
Didn’t we already vote on that?
-
Link Mauve
I quite remember having said +1 to it, or did something change that required a re-vote?
-
dwd
Well, you're welcome to say "+1" again for the avoidance of doubt.
-
Link Mauve
I’m +1 on it anyway. ^^
-
dwd
I think we re-voted.
-
dwd
OK.
-
dwd
Any OB?
-
dwd
Assuming not:
-
Link Mauve
Still deploring the lack of specification for the various form values in this XEP and a few other ones.
-
Link Mauve
None from me.
-
jonas’
none from me
-
dwd
OK
-
dwd
6) Next Meeting
-
dwd
+1W?
-
jonas’
wfm
-
dwd
That's 2019-05-22 15:00Z I believe.
-
dwd
7) Ite, Meeting Est
-
dwd
Thanks all.
-
dwd
jonas’, Looks like you have a load of Editor work now, sorry.
-
pep.
Link Mauve, I think 758 was first vetoed and then it was brought back to life a few weeks after
-
jonas’
that’s alright
-
jonas’
will see to it in half an hour or so
-
Link Mauve
pep., oh, thanks.
-
dwd
Link Mauve, Yeah, I think Kev originally vetoed, and somebody changed his mind several weeks afterward.
-
pep.
Does that not keep the original votes in this case? As in "I'm coming back on my decision" rather than "it's a new decision", it's not like 0060 has advanced or anything had changed with regard to it (or what judges would say "new evidence has come to light")
-
jonas’
dwd, thanks for annotating the PRs
-
dwd
(Some of)
-
jonas’
dwd, for the next agenda: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/690#issuecomment-463793958
-
Ge0rG
Oops. Sorry, looks like I missed the meeting.
-
jonas’
uh
-
jonas’
I can see a conflict arising
-
jonas’
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/779 has passed the council vote, but the text there is not 100% compatible with the text proposed on the ML✎ -
jonas’
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/779 has passed the council vote, but the text there is not 100% compatible with the text proposed by Ge0rG on the ML for a proper fix ✏
-
jonas’
oh, it is
-
jonas’
nevermind
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: that #690 comment is three months old, unless github is in another time bubble, right?
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, yes, but we still haven’t talked about it
-
jonas’
note that the PR is even from last council
-
jonas’
dwd, also for next agenda: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/778 -- we need to re-discuss it after the changes Ge0rG made, it was vetoed by Kev before
-
dwd
Ge0rG, No worries about missing a null meeting.
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: 778 has been voted on twice, the last vote was with the new changes.
-
jonas’
are you sure?
-
jonas’
ah I’m too stupid to read
-
jonas’
yeah
-
jonas’
passed \o/
-
jonas’
I’m starting to question whether I should really be messing with xsf/xeps right now
-
jonas’
mmmmmergespree