XMPP Council - 2019-05-22


  1. Wojtek has joined

  2. Wojtek has left

  3. oli has joined

  4. ivucica has joined

  5. oli has left

  6. oli has joined

  7. oli has left

  8. oli has joined

  9. ivucica has left

  10. oli has left

  11. oli has joined

  12. oli has left

  13. oli has joined

  14. oli has left

  15. oli has joined

  16. oli has left

  17. oli has joined

  18. oli has left

  19. oli has joined

  20. oli has left

  21. oli has joined

  22. oli has left

  23. oli has joined

  24. oli has left

  25. oli has joined

  26. oli has left

  27. oli has joined

  28. oli has left

  29. oli has joined

  30. oli has left

  31. oli has joined

  32. oli has left

  33. oli has joined

  34. oli has left

  35. oli has joined

  36. oli has left

  37. oli has joined

  38. oli has left

  39. oli has joined

  40. oli has left

  41. oli has joined

  42. oli has left

  43. oli has joined

  44. oli has left

  45. oli has joined

  46. Zash has left

  47. Zash has joined

  48. debacle has joined

  49. lnj has joined

  50. lnj has left

  51. oli has left

  52. lnj has joined

  53. oli has joined

  54. ivucica has joined

  55. oli has left

  56. oli has joined

  57. oli has left

  58. oli has joined

  59. debacle has left

  60. debacle has joined

  61. debacle has left

  62. debacle has joined

  63. oli has left

  64. Ge0rG looks around, then hides under a large rock

  65. dwd has seen.

  66. jonas’ too

  67. dwd

    OK.

  68. jonas’

    ok?

  69. jonas’

    itym OOK.

  70. dwd

    It's meeting time, is what I actually meant.

  71. jonas’

    now it is

  72. Kev

    Except it wasn't.

  73. Kev

    But now is.

  74. jonas’

    there we go

  75. jonas’ flips the rock under which Ge0rG is hiding over to uncover him

  76. dwd

    1) Who is here?

  77. jonas’

    I am

  78. Ge0rG

    Hey!

  79. dwd

    Sorry for the late start.

  80. Kev

    I is here.

  81. Ge0rG

    How is it late if you stated 5 seconds early?

  82. dwd

    Link Mauve ?

  83. Kev

    He won't know the answer to that, surely?

  84. dwd

    Kev, Apparently not.

  85. dwd

    2) Agenda Tcshing

  86. dwd

    Anyone got anything more than was already on the agenda?

  87. dwd

    If not...

  88. dwd

    3) Items for votings:

  89. dwd

    a) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/690 XEP-0184: Make the schema require @id in <received/>

  90. Kev

    I've left a comment there just moments ago.

  91. Kev

    https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/690/files

  92. dwd

    As noted, this is an old PR that's been rejected, but has since been reopened.

  93. jonas’

    I agree with Kevs comment

  94. Ge0rG

    +1, ideally including the Kev wording change

  95. jonas’

    I was confused there too for a second

  96. dwd

    Kev, Is that a veto, but accepting it in advance with that note?

  97. Kev

    I guess technically yes? But really it's "yes, and" rather than "No!".

  98. jonas’

    I follow Kev on this one

  99. Kev

    I really view it as approval given that Link Mauve would presumably update the text before the end of the voting period :)

  100. Kev

    But regardless, +1 if that tweak gets merged, -0 otherwise.

  101. dwd

    OK - so... Votes... Is that everyone with a bizarre conditional +1, then?

  102. Ge0rG

    But we'd have to have a new vote after the update

  103. dwd

    Ge0rG, Not if you all veto and change it when Link Mauve updates.

  104. Kev

    Ge0rG: I'm not convinced we really do. Nothing says that the change we vote on has to be in github.

  105. dwd

    Kev, This is also true.

  106. Ge0rG

    dwd: we miss your vote

  107. jonas’

    I think council can just bring in their own changes anyways

  108. Kev

    A proposed change that we approve being "Link Mauve's change plus Kev's text" can be approved AFAICS.

  109. jonas’

    so if we say "yeah, we want that change, Editor, do that when you merge" that’s what’s going to happen

  110. dwd

    Ge0rG, Good point. I'm +1 on the change including Kev's proposal.

  111. dwd

    Moving on...

  112. dwd

    b) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/750 XEP-0300: remove content which has been moved to XEP-0414

  113. Kev

    I think events have overtaken this.

  114. jonas’

    do they?

  115. Kev

    As an Author already okayed it.

  116. jonas’

    have they?

  117. dwd

    Have they?

  118. jonas’

    ah, that

  119. jonas’

    probably

  120. dwd

    In that case, do we want to consider Last Call - I feel we should probably wait until this is merged.

  121. Ge0rG

    Can't we make a last call with a bizarre precondition?

  122. jonas’

    it’s all about bizarre conditions today

  123. dwd

    Ge0rG, Our powers are without limitation, it seems.

  124. dwd

    But no, we'll await a merge, I think.

  125. jonas’

    dwd, I think Board might have a word on that ;)

  126. Ge0rG

    dwd: we might need an author or a shepherd for the last call.

  127. dwd

    4) Outstanding Votes

  128. Ge0rG

    A membership vote is open.

  129. dwd

    When I wrote the agenda, we had none. Now we have one from Link Mauve...

  130. dwd

    5) AOB

  131. dwd

    No, wait.

  132. dwd

    5) Next Meeting

  133. dwd

    2019-05-29 OK for everyone?

  134. Ge0rG

    Most probably yes

  135. jonas’

    you’re making me do arithmetics in my head

  136. jonas’

    I don’t like that

  137. Kev

    I don't immediately have a problem with it :)

  138. jonas’

    wfm

  139. dwd

    6) AOB

  140. jonas’

    none from me

  141. Kev

    Nope.

  142. dwd

    I do, vaguely - does anyone have pointers to the "Inbox" discussions from the various summits?

  143. Ge0rG

    I don't have any breaking changes to XEPs to offer on short notice.

  144. jonas’

    I’d expect Kev to have some

  145. jonas’

    but surely we have minutes?

  146. dwd

    I ask because I'm considering knocking out a candidate design, and I'm curious to see how it matches what has been discussed.

  147. jonas’

    there’s something on smart mam here which might relate slightly to that: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Minutes_of_the_2019_Summit:_Day_one

  148. dwd

    But no matter, I'm sure I can probably find the minutes etc.

  149. Kev

    I don't have pointers to them, but I have considerable interest in the area, and also opinions ;)

  150. dwd

    Kev, Opinions? How unlike you.

  151. Kev

    In as much as I think it can be driven pretty much entirely through smart use of the archive currently referred to as MAM.

  152. jonas’

    dwd, there’s also this: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Minutes_of_the_2018_Summit:_Day_one#1.4_Inbox_.28Open_Chats.29

  153. dwd

    Kev, I agree up to a point.

  154. dwd

    jonas’, Thanks.

  155. Kev

    dwd: I'm up for a quick chat about it, at least. Before or after a strawman or more appears.

  156. Ge0rG

    I remember a discussion in Düsseldorf that resulted in the realization that just using MAM, smartly or not, is not sufficient.

  157. Kev

    No, MAM is not sufficient.

  158. dwd

    Kev, Cool, I'll organise a timeslot.

  159. Kev

    But I think it makes sense to be using data heavily tied to the archive that is currently presented over MAM.

  160. jonas’

    I’d like to at least listen in to those discussions

  161. dwd

    Kev, Yes, with you there.

  162. dwd

    jonas’, I'll organise a timeslot with a chatroom attached.

  163. jonas’

    that sounds great

  164. jonas’

    unless it’s a webex ;)

  165. dwd

    jonas’, Oh, you want video too?

  166. jonas’

    nooo

  167. jonas’

    doesn’t work anyways

  168. dwd

    (I';m actually fine with that, but...)

  169. Ge0rG

    It MUST be using XMPP. No Experimental XEPs, though.

  170. dwd

    Ge0rG, :-)

  171. Kev

    I was assuming video, because bandwidth.

  172. dwd

    Right, anyway, I think we're drifting into:

  173. Kev

    Thanks all.

  174. dwd

    7) Ite, Meeting Est.

  175. jonas’

    I don’t like the acausality of today’s meeting.

  176. jonas’

    thanks, dwd & all

  177. dwd

    jonas’, Cause and effect, but not necessarily in that order.

  178. Ge0rG

    jonas’: I'm pretty sure that people haven't yet digested the fallout of the preceding meetings, that resulted in a peak of editor activity recently.

  179. jonas’

    for certain definitions of "recently"

  180. jonas’

    I did most of the stuff last week and simply forget to send the emails :-X

  181. Ge0rG

    jonas’: I'm sure that all the people who are using website change notification services to watch for XEP changes noticed.

  182. Syndace has left

  183. susmit88 has joined

  184. Syndace has joined

  185. Zash has left

  186. Zash has joined

  187. susmit88 has left

  188. susmit88 has joined

  189. susmit88 has left

  190. susmit88 has joined

  191. susmit88 has left

  192. susmit88 has joined

  193. Wojtek has joined

  194. Wojtek has left

  195. Zash has left

  196. Wojtek has joined

  197. Wojtek has left

  198. debacle has left

  199. susmit88 has left

  200. susmit88 has joined

  201. susmit88 has left

  202. susmit88 has joined

  203. susmit88 has left

  204. susmit88 has joined

  205. susmit88 has left

  206. susmit88 has joined

  207. susmit88 has left

  208. susmit88 has joined

  209. Zash has joined

  210. susmit88 has left

  211. susmit88 has joined

  212. susmit88 has left

  213. susmit88 has joined

  214. lnj has left

  215. Wojtek has joined

  216. Wojtek has left

  217. susmit88 has left

  218. susmit88 has joined

  219. susmit88 has left

  220. susmit88 has joined

  221. susmit88 has left

  222. susmit88 has joined