dwdIn that case, do we want to consider Last Call - I feel we should probably wait until this is merged.
Ge0rGCan't we make a last call with a bizarre precondition?
jonas’it’s all about bizarre conditions today
dwdGe0rG, Our powers are without limitation, it seems.
dwdBut no, we'll await a merge, I think.
jonas’dwd, I think Board might have a word on that ;)
Ge0rGdwd: we might need an author or a shepherd for the last call.
dwd4) Outstanding Votes
Ge0rGA membership vote is open.
dwdWhen I wrote the agenda, we had none. Now we have one from Link Mauve...
dwd5) AOB
dwdNo, wait.
dwd5) Next Meeting
dwd2019-05-29 OK for everyone?
Ge0rGMost probably yes
jonas’you’re making me do arithmetics in my head
jonas’I don’t like that
KevI don't immediately have a problem with it :)
jonas’wfm
dwd6) AOB
jonas’none from me
KevNope.
dwdI do, vaguely - does anyone have pointers to the "Inbox" discussions from the various summits?
Ge0rGI don't have any breaking changes to XEPs to offer on short notice.
jonas’I’d expect Kev to have some
jonas’but surely we have minutes?
dwdI ask because I'm considering knocking out a candidate design, and I'm curious to see how it matches what has been discussed.
jonas’there’s something on smart mam here which might relate slightly to that: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Minutes_of_the_2019_Summit:_Day_one
dwdBut no matter, I'm sure I can probably find the minutes etc.
KevI don't have pointers to them, but I have considerable interest in the area, and also opinions ;)
dwdKev, Opinions? How unlike you.
KevIn as much as I think it can be driven pretty much entirely through smart use of the archive currently referred to as MAM.
jonas’dwd, there’s also this: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Minutes_of_the_2018_Summit:_Day_one#1.4_Inbox_.28Open_Chats.29
dwdKev, I agree up to a point.
dwdjonas’, Thanks.
Kevdwd: I'm up for a quick chat about it, at least. Before or after a strawman or more appears.
Ge0rGI remember a discussion in Düsseldorf that resulted in the realization that just using MAM, smartly or not, is not sufficient.
KevNo, MAM is not sufficient.
dwdKev, Cool, I'll organise a timeslot.
KevBut I think it makes sense to be using data heavily tied to the archive that is currently presented over MAM.
jonas’I’d like to at least listen in to those discussions
dwdKev, Yes, with you there.
dwdjonas’, I'll organise a timeslot with a chatroom attached.
jonas’that sounds great
jonas’unless it’s a webex ;)
dwdjonas’, Oh, you want video too?
jonas’nooo
jonas’doesn’t work anyways
dwd(I';m actually fine with that, but...)
Ge0rGIt MUST be using XMPP. No Experimental XEPs, though.
dwdGe0rG, :-)
KevI was assuming video, because bandwidth.
dwdRight, anyway, I think we're drifting into:
KevThanks all.
dwd7) Ite, Meeting Est.
jonas’I don’t like the acausality of today’s meeting.
jonas’thanks, dwd & all
dwdjonas’, Cause and effect, but not necessarily in that order.
Ge0rGjonas’: I'm pretty sure that people haven't yet digested the fallout of the preceding meetings, that resulted in a peak of editor activity recently.
jonas’for certain definitions of "recently"
jonas’I did most of the stuff last week and simply forget to send the emails :-X
Ge0rGjonas’: I'm sure that all the people who are using website change notification services to watch for XEP changes noticed.