XMPP Council - 2019-09-05

  1. Kev

    I realised there's probably little point updating references to use fastening until it's accepted, so I've put that off for another day.

  2. Ge0rG

    Is there a rendered version?

  3. Kev

    https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/fasten.html

  4. Ge0rG

    is that the latest version?

  5. Kev

    I believe it to be.

  6. Ge0rG

    Thanks.

  7. Ge0rG adds it to the TOREAD list

  8. Ge0rG

    Kev: I like the proposal but have some minor nitpicks, including the usage of very complicated English.

  9. Kev

    Ta. I'm happy to run an editorial pass at some point. Probably post-publication unless there's a reason not to.

  10. jonas’

    holy smokes

  11. jonas’

    the english is indeed tricky

  12. Kev

    I also apparently have users sending rections.

  13. Kev

    I suspect that wasn't my intent, whatever they are.

  14. jonas’

    :D

  15. Kev

    Heh, and Nyco just sent a patch for that after I noticed it.

  16. Ge0rG

    The XEP has an easy start, but then comes this monster of a sentence: > There are many situations in which a message contains a payload that contains content that adds additional information to the context of a previous message.

  17. Kev

    Not a single double negative in sight. I don't know what you're complaining about.

  18. Ge0rG

    Ah well, then go on!