KevI realised there's probably little point updating references to use fastening until it's accepted, so I've put that off for another day.
Ge0rGIs there a rendered version?
Ge0rGis that the latest version?
KevI believe it to be.
Ge0rGadds it to the TOREAD list
Ge0rGKev: I like the proposal but have some minor nitpicks, including the usage of very complicated English.
KevTa. I'm happy to run an editorial pass at some point. Probably post-publication unless there's a reason not to.
jonas’the english is indeed tricky
KevI also apparently have users sending rections.
KevI suspect that wasn't my intent, whatever they are.
KevHeh, and Nyco just sent a patch for that after I noticed it.
Ge0rGThe XEP has an easy start, but then comes this monster of a sentence:
> There are many situations in which a message contains a payload that contains content that adds additional information to the context of a previous message.
KevNot a single double negative in sight. I don't know what you're complaining about.