-
Kev
Just reviewed https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0423.html . Just in case I don't make today's meeting, I'm premptively +1 on moving 0.3 to Draft.
-
Ge0rG
Phew.
-
Dave Cridland
OK.
-
Dave Cridland
1) Roll Call
-
Kev
2, bacon.
-
Dave Cridland
Had 2 bacon ones for lunch today, with extra thick bacon. Yummy.
-
Dave Cridland
Ge0rG, Link Mauve, jonas’ ?
-
Ge0rG
Kevin Bacon?
- Ge0rG ,o/
-
Link Mauve
Yes, I’m here.
-
jonas’
.
-
jonas’
am here
-
Dave Cridland
Well, that's a full house.
-
jonas’
Bacon Buger!✎ -
Dave Cridland
2) Agenda Bashing
-
jonas’
Bacon Burger! ✏
-
Link Mauve
I’m hungry now.
-
Link Mauve
After failing at making mochi. :(
-
Dave Cridland
I'm assuming we just have XEP-0423 to Draft.
-
Ge0rG
Let's add something to the agenda just for the sake of it
-
Dave Cridland
Let's not.
-
Dave Cridland
3) Item for a vote:
-
jonas’
I’m +1 on XEP-0423 to Draft
-
Dave Cridland
a) Advance XEP-0423 to Draft.
-
Ge0rG
+1 on XEP-0423 to Draft
-
Dave Cridland
jonas’, Patience.
-
Link Mauve
I’m +1 on XEP-0423 to Draft.✎ -
Link Mauve
I’m +1 on advancing XEP-0423 to Draft. ✏
-
Kev
+1. And a big thank you to Ge0rG for sticking with this. This is, I think, the most useful CS we've had in as long as I can remember - I think having some sort of nuance really helps.
-
Link Mauve
Indeed!
-
Dave Cridland
Tempting to veto for dramatic purposes, now.
-
Dave Cridland
But no, best not.
-
Ge0rG
Dave Cridland: you could on-list instead and wait until the 20th.
-
Dave Cridland
+1 to advance to Draft. And I agree with Kev, this has been a lot of effort for Ge0rG, but it's resulted in a much better document than we've had for a long time.
-
Ge0rG
Even the 21st.
-
Ge0rG
And announce your vote right before Alex closes the polls.
-
Ge0rG
And then it will get delayed by the MTA and...
-
Dave Cridland
Thanks also to the rest of Council for the extra meeting and being prepared for it.
-
jonas’
I, too, am happy with the result, but I’m not with (nearly) burning out all CS editors✎ -
jonas’
I, too, am happy with the result, but I’m not with (nearly) burning out all CS editors/authors ✏
-
Dave Cridland
So, for the record, a unanimous decision to move CS-2020 to Draft.
-
Link Mauve
\o/
-
Ge0rG
I must admit, there was a period of some days after I started work on 423, where I felt burned out as well.
-
Dave Cridland
4) Next Meeting
-
Link Mauve
Next week Wednesday as usual?
-
Link Mauve
16:00Z
-
Ge0rG
+1 for next Wednesday
-
jonas’
wfm
-
Dave Cridland
Yes, I think so. I'd note that if there is anything to vote now, we'll have to either be able to vote immediately or it'll have to be re-raised by the next Council.
-
Dave Cridland
5) AOB
-
jonas’
none from me
-
Link Mauve
None from me either.
-
Dave Cridland
Other than saying how pleased I am to see lots of candidates for Board and Council, nothing from me.
-
Dave Cridland
OK.
-
Dave Cridland
6) Ite, Meeting Est
-
Dave Cridland
Thanks all.
-
Link Mauve
Thanks all for this exceptional meeting!
-
jonas’
thanks Dave et al.
-
jonas’
this was a good move indeed
-
jonas’
pep., do you want to do the honours?
-
pep.
sure
-
jonas’
:)
-
pep.
Dave Cridland, what was wrong from not having this meeting and putting it on list? Council members "just" needed to react quickly and not two weeks after :)
-
Kev
Meetings focus the mind, sometimes. We could have onlisted, but this way worked, so ... :)
-
jonas’
pep., yesterday there was no version to vote on yet
-
Ge0rG
pep.: the Last Call technically only ended last night, and there was the pending PR
-
jonas’
so there had to be a meeting which started the vote
-
pep.
Ge0rG, ok
-
jonas’
it was a lucky accident that everyone voted in the meeting and not on-list
-
Kev
We could have started the vote yesterday, on 'whatever version is published tomorrow morning', and all on-listed, but ... this way was better, I think.
-
Kev
Even if I'm not a fan of extra meetings I have to attend :)
-
Dave Cridland
Me neither, but I'm not a fan of starting a vote on a version that's unpublished just for the purpose of ensuring a timetable.
-
Kev
jonas’: I think 'lucky accident' is understating the effort people put in (mostly Ge0rG) to make sure it could happen.
-
Ge0rG
Kev: it was a kind of lucky accident nevertheless, because my calculation of the moment when to submit the XEP was off by two weeks.
-
jonas’
Kev, sorry, yes
-
jonas’
I didn’t mean to diminish that
-
jonas’
I was looking at it from a concurrency architectural perspective, where a certain sequence of events is almost always an accident
-
jonas’
I’m too deep in concurrent code at the moment
-
pep.
hmm, I have no minutes to link to yet.
-
pep.
I guess I'll just state that
-
jonas’
pep., you can link to the logs of this room
-
Kev
Linking to minutes is a very recent thing and is just a nicety, I think. There's nothing requiring it.
-
pep.
Kev, sure
-
Kev
(Assuming you mean referencing when it was approved by Council)
-
pep.
yes
-
Kev
I mean, I think it's a /good/ nicety, but if it's proving an issue here...
-
pep.
Just makes it easier to check back what happened when/why
-
Kev
Yes, I think it's a good thing.