+1. And a big thank you to Ge0rG for sticking with this. This is, I think, the most useful CS we've had in as long as I can remember - I think having some sort of nuance really helps.
Link Mauve
Indeed!
Dave Cridland
Tempting to veto for dramatic purposes, now.
Dave Cridland
But no, best not.
Ge0rG
Dave Cridland: you could on-list instead and wait until the 20th.
Dave Cridland
+1 to advance to Draft. And I agree with Kev, this has been a lot of effort for Ge0rG, but it's resulted in a much better document than we've had for a long time.
Ge0rG
Even the 21st.
Ge0rG
And announce your vote right before Alex closes the polls.
Ge0rG
And then it will get delayed by the MTA and...
Dave Cridland
Thanks also to the rest of Council for the extra meeting and being prepared for it.
jonas’
I, too, am happy with the result, but I’m not with (nearly) burning out all CS editors✎
jonas’
I, too, am happy with the result, but I’m not with (nearly) burning out all CS editors/authors ✏
Dave Cridland
So, for the record, a unanimous decision to move CS-2020 to Draft.
Link Mauve
\o/
Ge0rG
I must admit, there was a period of some days after I started work on 423, where I felt burned out as well.
Dave Cridland
4) Next Meeting
Link Mauve
Next week Wednesday as usual?
Link Mauve
16:00Z
Ge0rG
+1 for next Wednesday
jonas’
wfm
Dave Cridland
Yes, I think so. I'd note that if there is anything to vote now, we'll have to either be able to vote immediately or it'll have to be re-raised by the next Council.
Dave Cridland
5) AOB
jonas’
none from me
Link Mauve
None from me either.
Dave Cridland
Other than saying how pleased I am to see lots of candidates for Board and Council, nothing from me.
Dave Cridland
OK.
Dave Cridland
6) Ite, Meeting Est
Dave Cridland
Thanks all.
Link Mauve
Thanks all for this exceptional meeting!
jonas’
thanks Dave et al.
jonas’
this was a good move indeed
jonas’
pep., do you want to do the honours?
pep.
sure
jonas’
:)
pep.
Dave Cridland, what was wrong from not having this meeting and putting it on list? Council members "just" needed to react quickly and not two weeks after :)
Kev
Meetings focus the mind, sometimes. We could have onlisted, but this way worked, so ... :)
jonas’
pep., yesterday there was no version to vote on yet
Ge0rG
pep.: the Last Call technically only ended last night, and there was the pending PR
jonas’
so there had to be a meeting which started the vote
pep.
Ge0rG, ok
jonas’
it was a lucky accident that everyone voted in the meeting and not on-list
Kev
We could have started the vote yesterday, on 'whatever version is published tomorrow morning', and all on-listed, but ... this way was better, I think.
Kev
Even if I'm not a fan of extra meetings I have to attend :)
Dave Cridland
Me neither, but I'm not a fan of starting a vote on a version that's unpublished just for the purpose of ensuring a timetable.
Kev
jonas’: I think 'lucky accident' is understating the effort people put in (mostly Ge0rG) to make sure it could happen.
Ge0rG
Kev: it was a kind of lucky accident nevertheless, because my calculation of the moment when to submit the XEP was off by two weeks.
jonas’
Kev, sorry, yes
jonas’
I didn’t mean to diminish that
jonas’
I was looking at it from a concurrency architectural perspective, where a certain sequence of events is almost always an accident
jonas’
I’m too deep in concurrent code at the moment
pep.
hmm, I have no minutes to link to yet.
pep.
I guess I'll just state that
jonas’
pep., you can link to the logs of this room
Kev
Linking to minutes is a very recent thing and is just a nicety, I think. There's nothing requiring it.
pep.
Kev, sure
Kev
(Assuming you mean referencing when it was approved by Council)
pep.
yes
Kev
I mean, I think it's a /good/ nicety, but if it's proving an issue here...
pep.
Just makes it easier to check back what happened when/why