4a) Decide on advancement of XEP-0066
Title: Out of Band Data
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0066.html
Abstract:
This specification defines two XMPP protocol extensions for communicating
URIs, one for use in XMPP message stanzas and the other for use in a
structured request-response interaction via XMPP IQ stanzas. Among other
things, this enables one entity to inform another entity about a file that is
available at an HTTP URL.✎
jonas’
4a) Decide on advancement of XEP-0066
Title: Out of Band Data
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0066.html
Abstract:
This specification defines two XMPP protocol extensions for communicating URIs, one for use in XMPP message stanzas and the other for use in a structured request-response interaction via XMPP IQ stanzas. Among other things, this enables one entity to inform another entity about a file that is available at an HTTP URL. ✏
daniel
Very little feedback. I'd say -1
jonas’
(one day I’ll remember to strip the line breaks first)
jonas’
-1, there are a few sensible points brought up on-list
jonas’
those should be addressed first
Ge0rG
-1, I totally missed the CFE, but I'm pretty sure it's not There Yet
Zash
Eh, -1 then.
daniel
It seems to get hard to get feedback
daniel
I wonder why that is
jonas’
to get feedback on '66 or in general?
daniel
Does the community not know that this is important?
daniel
In general
jonas’
we can discuss this as AOB
jonas’
5) Outstanding Votes
I’m updating the spreadsheet of doom, one second
jonas’
we have a few outstanding votes: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ANu9KGmNf2r-qpLYqF7NdJTtqA1GIu55rf2deKbM0GA/edit?ts=5de7debe#gid=0
jonas’
the only thing which is about to expire is VETOED either way, so no hurry
jonas’
6) Date of Next
jonas’
+1w wfm
daniel
For me too
Zash
wfm
jonas’
7) AOB
daniel
I have a minor one
jonas’
daniel, so, re feedback: I was under the impression that we got above-average feedback in this LC/CFE spree
jonas’
maybe that was just my perception though
daniel
Dunno. I was particularly missing this for 66 and Avatar conversion
jonas’
I’m not sure how we’d be able to find out the cause of lack of feedback
jonas’
ah yeah, those in particular were pretty low.
daniel
Delivery receipts was bike shredded a bit
jonas’
(haha shredded)
jonas’
in case of '66, I was meaning to give feedback, but I didn’t make it to the deadline and others already stated things which need to be fixed either way
daniel
But yeah what ever. We probably won't find an answer to that anyway
jonas’
in case of avatar conversion I personally simply lack experience
jonas’
probably
jonas’
daniel, what’s your AOB?
Zash
jonas’: didn't we have a thread on avatar conversion?
daniel
Since council was involved in that a couple of weeks ago I would just like to inform council that the omemo situation should be resolved now
jonas’
ah yes, I noted the update
jonas’
it was quite extensive
kusonekohas left
kusonekohas joined
jonas’
I’m pleased to see that it now uses SCE
daniel
We have more authors who are willing to incorporate feedback
daniel
And we resolved the GPL situation
kusonekohas left
kusonekohas joined
daniel
That's it. Just wanted to have that on the record
pep.
note that it doesn't mean all libraries won't be GPL.. just that the spec is not bound to GPL anymore. Up to people to implement it :p
daniel
As it had been council business before
jonas’
alright
jonas’
anything else?
daniel
No
jonas’
alright
jonas’
8) Ite Meeting Est
jonas’
Thanks all, thanks Tedd in particular
Zash
Thanks all
paulhas left
Ge0rG
So I've read the Reminders XEP and the respective thread, and I have very mixed feelings about it all.
flow
Ge0rG, which you probably want to share in xsf@?
Ge0rG
flow: no, I'm currently wondering which Council decisioun would be the right one.