XMPP Council - 2020-03-11

I do, too

Soon

now

1) Roll Call

Here!

is that all?

Ge0rG!

forever alone

that’s a quorum

2) Agenda Bashing

anything to add to the posted agenda?

Here

I have nothing to add

alright, assuming no addition to the agenda

3) Editor’s Update - ProtoXEP: Reminders - Expired calls: CFE on XEP-0066 - Calls in progress: - CFE: XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts), ends: 2020-03-17

4) Items for voting

4a) Decide on advancement of XEP-0066 Title: Out of Band Data URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0066.html Abstract: This specification defines two XMPP protocol extensions for communicating URIs, one for use in XMPP message stanzas and the other for use in a structured request-response interaction via XMPP IQ stanzas. Among other things, this enables one entity to inform another entity about a file that is available at an HTTP URL. ✏

Very little feedback. I'd say -1

(one day I’ll remember to strip the line breaks first)

-1, there are a few sensible points brought up on-list

those should be addressed first

-1, I totally missed the CFE, but I'm pretty sure it's not There Yet

Eh, -1 then.

It seems to get hard to get feedback

I wonder why that is

to get feedback on '66 or in general?

Does the community not know that this is important?

In general

we can discuss this as AOB

5) Outstanding Votes I’m updating the spreadsheet of doom, one second

we have a few outstanding votes: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ANu9KGmNf2r-qpLYqF7NdJTtqA1GIu55rf2deKbM0GA/edit?ts=5de7debe#gid=0

the only thing which is about to expire is VETOED either way, so no hurry

6) Date of Next

+1w wfm

For me too

wfm

7) AOB

I have a minor one

daniel, so, re feedback: I was under the impression that we got above-average feedback in this LC/CFE spree

maybe that was just my perception though

Dunno. I was particularly missing this for 66 and Avatar conversion

I’m not sure how we’d be able to find out the cause of lack of feedback

ah yeah, those in particular were pretty low.

Delivery receipts was bike shredded a bit

(haha shredded)

in case of '66, I was meaning to give feedback, but I didn’t make it to the deadline and others already stated things which need to be fixed either way

But yeah what ever. We probably won't find an answer to that anyway

in case of avatar conversion I personally simply lack experience

probably

daniel, what’s your AOB?

jonas’: didn't we have a thread on avatar conversion?

Since council was involved in that a couple of weeks ago I would just like to inform council that the omemo situation should be resolved now

ah yes, I noted the update

it was quite extensive

I’m pleased to see that it now uses SCE

We have more authors who are willing to incorporate feedback

And we resolved the GPL situation

That's it. Just wanted to have that on the record

note that it doesn't mean all libraries won't be GPL.. just that the spec is not bound to GPL anymore. Up to people to implement it :p

As it had been council business before

alright

anything else?

No

alright

8) Ite Meeting Est

Thanks all, thanks Tedd in particular

Thanks all

So I've read the Reminders XEP and the respective thread, and I have very mixed feelings about it all.

Ge0rG, which you probably want to share in xsf@?

flow: no, I'm currently wondering which Council decisioun would be the right one.

what kind of mixed feelings Ge0rG

I'll write to standards@

k