-
Zash
Soon...
-
daniel
Very
-
daniel
Hi
-
jonas’
1) Roll Call
- jonas’ ←
- Zash 2
- Ge0rG ⬆
-
jonas’
daniel is there, too
-
jonas’
2) Agenda Bashing
-
jonas’
anything to add?
-
Zash
none here
-
Ge0rG
nope
-
jonas’
alright
-
jonas’
3) Editor’s Update - Expired calls: None - Calls in progress: XEP-0357 and XEP-0280. - New ProtoXEP: MUC Presence Versioning - More activity on OMEMO - XEP-0402 advanced to Draft - XEP-0435 (Reminders) accepted
-
jonas’
4) Items for voting
-
jonas’
4a) Proposed XMPP Extension: MUC Presence Versioning URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/muc-presence-versioning.html Abstract: This specification defines a versioning mechanism which reduces the amount of presence traffic in a XEP-0045 MUC
-
jonas’
haven’t read it yet, on-list
-
daniel
+1
-
Zash
+1
-
Ge0rG
+1
-
Zash
I read the raw XEP :) Interesting and seemed Good Enoug for Experimental™
-
Zash
unlike my spelling
-
Ge0rG
lovetox just promoted it to XEP Of The Year
-
jonas’
thanks, moving on
-
Zash
Haven't read the discussion yet tho
-
jonas’
(am I too fast?)
-
jonas’
4b) PR#913: XEP-0068: Clarify that FORM_TYPE does not need to be type='hidden' in submission forms URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/913
-
jonas’
I heard rumors of a very useful diff link, Ge0rG
-
Ge0rG
does it have any implications on legacy?
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: it was in the PR!
-
jonas’
!
-
Zash
!
-
Ge0rG
¡
-
jonas’
so in theory it does have an impact, since forms which were previously not under XEP-0068 regieme (type="submit" with FORM_TYPE without type) are now
-
jonas’
but I don’t think that’s critical
-
Ge0rG
I suppose I'm +1
-
jonas’
though I remotely recall having to fix something around this in aioxmpp actually
-
jonas’
can’t find it though
-
jonas’
the "clarification" is good
-
jonas’
so +1
-
Zash
I think, with type=submit you would likely already have the form prototype, so the type is already known.
-
Zash
+1
-
Zash
daniel?
-
daniel
On list
-
jonas’
alright
-
jonas’
5) Outstanding Votes
-
jonas’
just me and Zash at this point on '184
-
jonas’
(doesn’t matter *much* since advancement has already been vetoed)
-
jonas’
I’m +0 following Daves argument
-
jonas’
Zash, do you want to vote on that?
-
Zash
+0
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: was there further clarification of The Authors Of 0184?
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, yes, PSA said he’d help
-
jonas’
so I suggest you coordinate with PSA to be able to fill gaps in his availability
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: yes, but he didn't say *how* he can help ;)
-
Ge0rG
so.. prepare PR, flag him?
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, I suggest you get in direct contact with him about the tasks which are on the todo
-
jonas’
just in case he wants to do the text mangling himself
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: roger that
- Ge0rG moves Editor out of the line
-
jonas’
alright
-
jonas’
6) Date of Next
-
jonas’
+1w wfm, with the adapted DST timeslot
-
Zash
wfm
-
Ge0rG
+1W WFM
-
daniel
Wfm
-
jonas’
7) AOB
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: is anybody in Council affected by a DST change that hasn't happened yet?
-
Zash
We're kinda eurocentric atm no?
-
daniel
When does the UK switch. Usually a week after us?
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, no
-
jonas’
daniel, no, at the same time
-
jonas’
I checked
-
Zash
I seem to remember something about vcard4.
-
daniel
Oh ok
-
Zash
Yay EU
-
jonas’
at least if pytz.timezone("Europe/London") vs. pytz.timezone("Europe/Berlin") vs. pytz.timezone("Europe/Stockholm") didn’t lie to me, everyone is on the same DST rhyhtm
-
jonas’
AO-AOB?
-
jonas’
assuming none
-
jonas’
8) Ite Meeting Est
-
jonas’
thanks everyone, thanks Tedd :)
-
Zash
Thanks all
-
Ge0rG
Tedd saved April Fool's!
-
Zash
All glory to Tedd
-
Ge0rG
All glory to the Hypno-Tedd?
-
Zash
Precisely
-
jonas’
All Hail the Glow-Tedd