jonas’daniel said he’ll probably not make it, dwd isn’t here but in xsf@, pinged him
jonas’let’s dive in anyways
jonas’2) Agenda Bashing
jonas’any modifications?
ZashIt's fine as it is! :)
Ge0rGI've got a really very small tiny AOB re CS2021.
jonas’Ge0rG, I expected as much :)
jonas’3) Editor’s Update
jonas’nawthing
jonas’4) Items for voting
jonas’nothing either
jonas’5) Date of Next
jonas’so as I mentioned many times, I won’t be available for chairing or agendaing in the next two weeks
Ge0rGI'm most probably going to be still here next week
dwdhas joined
jonas’dwd already said he’ll not be available next week. Ge0rG didn’t know last week (do you know this week?), Zash wsa the only one without obstructions.
dwdHey, sorry I'm late.
jonas’hi dwd
jonas’right on time for the first point of discussion :)
Ge0rGjonas’: it looks like I'm going to be unavailable after next week, but still no precise ETA
dwdI may not be about next week. I've the week off, so keeping track of time becomes highly tricky.
jonas’dwd, I know that feel
Ge0rGI could armchair-chair next weeks, but I'm not sure I can prepare an adequate agenda.
jonas’I would propose that we skip next week given that it’s not a particularly busy time right now anyways and that all can’t say for sure what’ll be what.
dwdAnd also undesirable. Who wants to clock-watch while on holiday?
jonas’dwd, alarm clocks are a thing :)
jonas’Zash, any opinion?
jonas’from what I can tell, we have Zash next week, 0.8 Ge0rGs, 0.5 daniels, 0.2 dwds and 0.0 jonas’
Ge0rGthat's not quite a quorum, is it?
jonas’not if my guesses are correct
jonas’though like quantum states, the probabilities will, hopefully, resolve to natural numbers at the meeting time
Ge0rGwell, it's 1.0 Ge0rG, except not for the role of chair
jonas’I’d rather not have to deal with the mess of, for example, 0.8 Ge0rGs
jonas’ok, the next *regular* meeting will be in +3w
ZashI think we can survive skipping one or two meetings
jonas’yeah
jonas’let’s just do that
jonas’any objections to +3w?
Zashnone
jonas’dwd, Ge0rG?
ZashDo we have any LCs ending or somesuch?
jonas’Zash, the '411 LC ends, not entirely by coincidence, in +2w
jonas’so that’ll be OK
Ge0rGjonas’: I'm most probably not going to be there in +3W, and probably neither in +4W
jonas’Ge0rG, we’ll have to live with that
Ge0rGso +1W WFM, but not the other ones
dwd+3w? Why not +2w? I know jonas’ won't be about, but I think the rest of us will be?
Ge0rGjonas’: you asked for my opinion on that ;P
jonas’dwd, we can also do +2w, but nobody has been enthusiastic about taking chair and agenda writing role on that date either
jonas’if we can find someone to do so, that’d be great and I’d be all for it
debaclehas joined
jonas’dwd, so if you want to take on that, let’s do +2w
dwdI can try, certainly.
dwdI may even remember to do an agenda (I probably will do if there's anything to put on it).
jonas’OK, so +2w with dwd as chair
jonas’6) AOB
jonas’hands the Mic to Ge0rG once more
Ge0rGI've uploaded an almost identical twin of XEP 0423 into inbox/cs-2021.xml at https://github.com/ge0rg/xeps/tree/cs2021
Ge0rGI can open a PR with it, but I'd rather first have daniel write the A/V section, in case an Editor decides to merge it and ask Council
jonas’Ge0rG, you can open a draft PR
jonas’then we won’t go ahead and merge things
jonas’and if you open the PR on gitlab, you also get a rendered version of the protoxep for free!
dwdI would like to know if anyone "used" the last one. I'll commit to writing to standards@ and asking if anyone did.
Ge0rGjonas’: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/980
Ge0rGdwd: please do so
dwdWill do.
Ge0rGjonas’: how do I open a PR on gitlab?
jonas’Ge0rG, like you do on github
Ge0rGah, https://gitlab.com/xsf/xeps
Ge0rGI do need to fork it there as well, right?
jonas’yes
jonas’diff told me that the changes are purely metadata though
Ge0rGRight.
jonas’Ge0rG, you have in mind that daniel is mostly afk for the next 4w?
dwdIf you fork on gitlab you can then push to it from your github repo, mind.
jonas’*from your local clone of the github repo
Ge0rGthe xeps checkout is by far not the one with the most remotes on my machine.
jonas’yet!
jonas’do we have anything else to discuss on this?
jonas’or do we have another AOB?
Ge0rG> The source branch is 7 commits behind the target branch
Ge0rGthere is some lack of synchronization going on