I'm still sitting in a conference call and can't promise my attention
sonnyhas left
jonas’
1) Roll Call
Zash
!
dwdhas joined
dwd
Hiya.
dwd
(Just in time!)
jonas’
do we get a daniel?
daniel
hi
jonas’
excellent
jonas’
2) Agenda Bashing
jonas’
anything?
jonas’
taking that as a no.
jonas’
3) Editor’s Update
- Accepted XEP-0352 (Client State Indication) as Draft
- Accepted XEP-0411 (Bookmarks Conversion) as Draft
jonas’
4) Items for voting
jonas’
4a) MR!22: add composer, date, genre, language, lyricist, and performer tags; make rating optional
URL: https://gitlab.com/xsf/xeps/-/merge_requests/25/diffs
Abstract: It seems, that "XEP-0118: User Tune" has been written mainly with pop music in mind, or maybe progressive rock. To make it more interesting for use with classical music or jazz, or audio books, some tags should be added, at least composer, date, genre, language, lyricist, and performer.
adityaborikarhas left
adityaborikarhas joined
neoxhas left
Zash
Hm, Draft
jonas’
indeed
Zash
and non-versioned namespace
jonas’
too
jonas’
not sure what to do with this
jonas’
would it make sense to put the new stuff in a separate namespace but under the same child?
dwd
My gut feeling on this is that the better solution might be to create an entirely new User Tune kind of thing. I'm guessing that there's probably a lot more other/prior art here now, thanks to the likes of Spotify etc.
daniel
probably what dwd said
daniel
i don’t really have an opinion on that tbh
dwd
At least better to explore that avenue first.
daniel
do people actually use that?
jonas’
from a practical perspective, I think no harm is done by adding elements scoped into a different namespace under the same child✎
jonas’
from a practical perspective, I think no harm is done by adding elements scoped into a different namespace under the same <tune/> ✏
dwd
daniel, Yes, though Edwin Mons has been listening to the same music for possibly decades now.
jonas’
it’s obviously a 90% solution only, however, I doubt that we can get a 100% solution
Zash
There's probably not much harm in accepting this either, unless someone has a strict schema validator.
sonnyhas joined
Kev
dwd: That sounds likely, TBH.
dwd
Kev, I admit the "progressive rock" reference in the PR did make me think of him...
Zash
Version 1.2 (2008-01-30)
> Added rating element.
Zash
Hmmmmm
jonas’
I’ll be bold and vote +1 on this.
jonas’
Zash, nice find!
Zash
Myeah, +1
dwd
I think I'm -0.
jonas’
any other votes?
Kev
What is the harm in namespacing it, vs the known harm of not doing so?
Zash
If someone does find a Right Proper standard for audio metadata that we could point to, that'd be cool as a User Tune 2
Ge0rG
I'm on-list
Zash
Kev, complicates implementations
jonas’
Kev, round trip with the MR author causing friction vs. potential strict schema validators breaking
daniel
if I vote -0 it takes a +1 from Ge0rG for it to go through right?
jonas’
daniel, true
daniel
-0 then
jonas’
haha
jonas’
neat
jonas’
moving on
Kev
jonas’: I note that those *are* a thing. People do deploy checkers to ensure content conforms to specs.
dwd
daniel, Ge0rG can take the pressure.
jonas’
4b) Propose Martin Dosch as Editor
jonas’
+1
Ge0rG
+1
daniel
+1
Zash
+1
dwd
I have had, I think, little contact with him, but anyone willing to put in the work sounds like a good idea, so +1.
+1w should wfm, but it’s RIPE GM in that week, so I may not be able to chair
Zash
+1w wfm
jonas’
hoping that we’ll get quorum next week then
jonas’
6) AOB
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Zash
None here
jonas’
ok, I’ll go ahead then: Elections are coming up
jonas’
put up your application if you want to (deadline is 2020-11-08) and/or encourage folks from the community of whom you’d think they’d be good in this role
jonas’
that’s it
jonas’
7) Ite Meeting Est
jonas’
thanks everyone
jonas’
thanks Tedd
Zash
Thanks
jonas’
dwd, reminder that you wanted to start a thread on OOB vs. SIMS vs. ??? in the context of the CFE for http upload
Zash
Hmmmmmm, will I have more spare cycles next year?
jonas’
if 2020 taught us anything, it’s how unpredictable the world is *shrug*
dwd
Yes, I will.
dwd
In fact I've got the CFE up to reply to already. Just haven't written the email, but I will do now.
jonas’
neat :)
Wojtekhas joined
sonnyhas left
sonnyhas joined
Zash
> Any changes to a Draft XEP that could reasonably be construed as material must be *provisionally published, announced and discussed on the Standards mailing list*, and formally approved by the XMPP Council
debaclehas left
sonnyhas left
dwd
Zash, Process Smash!
dwd
Zash, Although I'm a lot more comfortable when changes are thoroughly discussed within the community.