jonas’don’t give me flashbacks to my english teacher in 8th grade.
jonas’1) Roll Call
jonas’(I do not actually have any strong opinion about this, except that I sure hope that no festivities take place this year, but still)
ZashHere. Trying to compare compliance suites.
ZashI have no idea what "Helau" is referencing.
jonas’Zash, related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnival in germany, specifically in north-rhine westfalia
jonas’we do have quorum. I hope dave did not get hit by a box of rare vintage beer bottles
jonas’2) Agenda Bashing
jonas’3) Editor’s Update
Nothing out of the ordinary.
jonas’4) Items for voting
jonas’NOTE: This is the second-to-last Council meeting of this election period. Votes started in this meeting run in danger of expiring at the boundary of Council terms.
jonas’4a) Decide on Advancement of XEP-0443: XMPP Compliance Suites 2021
Abstract: This document defines XMPP application categories for different use cases (Core, Web, IM, and Mobile), and specifies the required XEPs that client and server software needs to implement for compliance with the use cases.
danielthere was feedback that hasn’t been addressed yet, no?
danielor did I miss an update
jonas’there was an update yesterday I didn’t look closely at yet
jonas’now that was a useless link paste of mine
jonas’I’m sure Ge0rG would’ve something to say about that, but I hear he’s caught in a call ;)
jonas’daniel, here’s the diff: https://gitlab.com/xsf/xeps/-/merge_requests/35/diffs
danieloh ok. thanks. yes I think that addresses the feedback
danielwhich means I'm +1
jonas’I am +1, too
ZashI feel like there could have been more feedback however.
jonas’assuming that Ge0rG will vote later on
jonas’Zash, I agree
jonas’but at the same time, I’m happy that we didn’t have a huge semantics thread on the mailinglist
ZashBut at the same time, the differences from the previous compliance suite is not that big, and that was accepted.
jonas’4b) PR1001: XEP-0393: clarify rules for span directives
Abstract: Previously I believe the styling of *** in the examples was incorrect. After discussing the matter on the mailing list we came to the conclusion that the actual rules were ambiguous and therefore *** could be styled either way.
jonas’I did not look into that yet
danieldito. on list
Ge0rG+1 on 4a, on-list on 4b
jonas’I’m on-list, too
jonas’please don’t let this one expire ;)
jonas’5) Pending Votes
- dwd and daniel on the ibr-token ProtoXEP, also the votes from today
jonas’daniel, want to cast your vote on the ibr-token ProtoXEP?
danieldoes this expire today?
jonas’no, next week
danielin that case i'm still on list
jonas’6) Date of Next
jonas’+1w wfm, though it’s a holiday and I might forget about the meeting. I’ll try hard not to :)