XMPP Council - 2020-11-11

I'm still catched in a different call

s/catched/caught/

don’t give me flashbacks to my english teacher in 8th grade.

oh sorry.

1) Roll Call

Helau

(I do not actually have any strong opinion about this, except that I sure hope that no festivities take place this year, but still)

Here. Trying to compare compliance suites.

I have no idea what "Helau" is referencing.

Hi

Zash, related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnival in germany, specifically in north-rhine westfalia

either way

we do have quorum. I hope dave did not get hit by a box of rare vintage beer bottles

2) Agenda Bashing

any notes?

assuming no

3) Editor’s Update Nothing out of the ordinary.

4) Items for voting

NOTE: This is the second-to-last Council meeting of this election period. Votes started in this meeting run in danger of expiring at the boundary of Council terms.

4a) Decide on Advancement of XEP-0443: XMPP Compliance Suites 2021 URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0443.html Abstract: This document defines XMPP application categories for different use cases (Core, Web, IM, and Mobile), and specifies the required XEPs that client and server software needs to implement for compliance with the use cases.

there was feedback that hasn’t been addressed yet, no?

or did I miss an update

there was an update yesterday I didn’t look closely at yet

https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0443.html

now that was a useless link paste of mine

I’m sure Ge0rG would’ve something to say about that, but I hear he’s caught in a call ;)

daniel, here’s the diff: https://gitlab.com/xsf/xeps/-/merge_requests/35/diffs

oh ok. thanks. yes I think that addresses the feedback

which means I'm +1

I am +1, too

+1

I feel like there could have been more feedback however.

assuming that Ge0rG will vote later on

Zash, I agree

but at the same time, I’m happy that we didn’t have a huge semantics thread on the mailinglist

But at the same time, the differences from the previous compliance suite is not that big, and that was accepted.

4b) PR1001: XEP-0393: clarify rules for span directives URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1001 Abstract: Previously I believe the styling of *** in the examples was incorrect. After discussing the matter on the mailing list we came to the conclusion that the actual rules were ambiguous and therefore *** could be styled either way. See-Also: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-November/037859.html

I did not look into that yet

dito. on list

+1 on 4a, on-list on 4b

Ge0rG, thanks

I’m on-list, too

on-list

yay

please don’t let this one expire ;)

5) Pending Votes - dwd and daniel on the ibr-token ProtoXEP, also the votes from today

daniel, want to cast your vote on the ibr-token ProtoXEP?

does this expire today?

no, next week

in that case i'm still on list

okay thanks

6) Date of Next

+1w wfm, though it’s a holiday and I might forget about the meeting. I’ll try hard not to :)

Is it?

+1w wfm

+1w wfm

Zash, in some parts of germany it is

cool, that’ll be quorum

7) AOB

nothing?

none here

... good luck in the elections?

yeah, also, please cast your vote

and thanks to Alex for organising it

then...

8) Ite Meeting Est

thanks everyone, thanks Tedd, thanks Alex

Thanks all

thanks everyone