3) Editor’s Update
* New ProtoXEP: Automatic Trust Management
jonas’
* Also, restart of two LCs which affect Council
jonas’
4) Items for voting
jonas’
Does everyone agree to the working agreement that we will have 14 day voting periods starting at the first meeting where the agendum is discussed?
Zash
Worked well enough this past year.
Ge0rG
That's not on the Agenda!
jonas’
I’m explicitly asking because there are documents on xmpp.org which say quite otherwise
Zash
:O
adiaholichas left
Ge0rG
I like the 14 day period as it gives you two Council Meetings to catch up. Let's continue it
dwd
They loosely say it's when the Editor puts them before Council that the 14 day starts, but I thought we'd fixed that?
jonas’
curiously enough, they state that the XMPP Editor sets the voting period, which is even stranger
jonas’
but ok, it seems everyone is in broad agreement, please let me know until end of meeting if otherwise
jonas’
4a) PR#1014: XEP-0176: Improve compatibility with WebRTC clients
URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1014
daniel
On list
daniel
I'm honestly not entirely sure about the implications
dwd
On list for this, sorry, I need to find some WebRTC expertise.
jonas’
same
jonas’
(on list)
Ge0rG
on-list
Zash
Uh, looked almost editorial, with only the schema change?
dwd
jonas’, [[ Can I flag some AOB, please, before I forget? ]]
jonas’
dwd, yes
jonas’
Zash, I think we should ask the PR author to add some wording to the normative part in order to tie the change down properly if we agree to it
jonas’
Zash, any vote?
Link Mauve
Noted, thanks.
Zash
on-list I suppose. anyone got WebRTC expertise we can drag into reviewing this? :)
jonas’
Zash, maybe the web client folks
dwd
Zash, I'm talking to Fippo now.
jonas’
dwd, excellent
jonas’
moving on, given the time
Ge0rG
it'd be great to have webrtc folks feedback on-list
jonas’
4b) PR#1008: XEP-0047: fix incorrect max sequence number
URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1008
Abstract: Previously the text said that the max sequence number was 65535 (max unsigned 16 bit integer), but also said this was (1<<15)-1, which is actually max signed 16 bit integer or 32767.
Zash
+1
daniel
On list
jonas’
I think this is fair enough, +1
dwd
This one I'm +1 on; it's just fixing a typo in a parenthetical remark.
Ge0rG
+1
jonas’
4c) PR#1001: XEP-0393: clarify rules for span directives
URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1001
I think Dave missed the deadline last term. If I just overlooked the vote, please let me know.
jonas’
yeah...
jonas’
I am still +0
daniel
+1
Zash
0+, again
Ge0rG
+1
jonas’
dwd, ?
dwd
Erm. I don't recall this one at all before.
jonas’
fun!
jonas’
it was the one I asked you all not to let expire ;D
dwd
And I'm not sure I understand it, so I'll go for on-list, sorry.
jonas’
alright
jonas’
4d) Proposed XMPP Extension: Automatic Trust Management
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/automatic-trust-management.html
Abstract: This document specifies a way to automatically manage the trust in public long-term keys used by end-to-end encryption protocols.
jonas’
on-list
dwd
I *might* have to write this all out as ABNF in order to understand it.
jonas’
dwd, please do, and then put it in the XEP
Zash
dwd, if you do, you get all the +1s
Ge0rG
that proto-xep goes in the sad tradition of XEP authors redefining commonly-used acronyms