jonas’ITYM have a nice the-internet-is-on-fire day
Ge0rGI haven't noticed any of that yet
Ge0rGAll my phone conferences went well and I didn't have a yax.im meltdown
jonas’anyway, do we get a daniel or a dwd?
jonas’2) Agenda Bashing
Ge0rGjonas’: I'm sure the dnsmasq thing will result in a large amount of DDoS and some clownflare self-promotion later down the stream
Ge0rGIt's a good agenda
jonas’3) Editor’s Update
- Proposed XMPP Extensions:
- Service Outage Status
- New XEPs:
- XEP-0451 (Stanza Multiplexing)
jonas’(yeah, I forgot to send out the emails, they’re there now)
jonas’4) Items for voting
jonas’4a) Proposed XMPP Extension: Service Outage Status
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that enables a
server to communicate issues with the server to all users in a semantic
jonas’+1, I’ll send a few notes to the list
Ge0rGNo idea about the PubSub parts though.
dwdon-list, sorry, been silly busy this week.
jonas’5) Pending Votes
Ge0rG> This information MUST be scoped using a FORM_TYPE of "urn:xmpp:tmp:sos"
I'm not sure if that text in §2 mandates actually implementing that feature
jonas’I am +1 on MUC Mention Notifications, +1 on DOAP usage in XMPP and +1 on OMEMO Media Sharing (but that I already said last week)
Ge0rGWas there any news from the Council Process Taskforce regarding submitting a Historical XEP?
dwdI think people agreed Historical sounded sensible, didn't they?
jonas’other pending votes:
- Ge0rG on MUC mention notifications (expiring today)
- dwd and Zash on DOAP usage in XMPP (unless I missed anything in that huge thread, expiring next week)
- dwd, Ge0rG, Zash on OMEMO Media Sharing (expiring next week)
Ge0rGAnd the IPR issue was resolved on record, I presume
Ge0rG+1 for https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/omemo-media-sharing.html then
jonas’Ge0rG, it was
jonas’well done, Ge0rG is now pending-vote-free
jonas’hands Ge0rG one of those 🏅
dwdSo, I'm +1 for the OMEMO sharing one.
jonas’dwd, recorded, thanks
dwdI'm +1 for the DOAP one, but I note that I think we should tidy it up a bit, change the namespace used to an XSF one, and suchlike. I mean, I wouldn't want people charging off and doing this "as-is" quite yet.
jonas’Ge0rG, FWIW, reading your email, I think all what you outline is exactly what Experimental should be for, IMO.
Zashdwd, too late!
jonas’Link Mauve, cc what dwd wrote above
Link MauveTa. :)
dwdI'm not sure I understood the implications of the SupportedXep XML blob within RDF, but then, I'm no RDF expert anyway.
Ge0rGjonas’: I am aware of that, but my suggestions are essentially "use a very small subset of this to implement a different use-case"
ZashRDF being RDF
dwdZash, Well I assume experimental usage is experimental, so...
Ge0rGjonas’: maybe I don't get the use-case of the submission and it's doing what it was supposed to do in the form it was submitted
jonas’Ge0rG, I personally think that this will see a lot of work to refine it, which is OK IMO
jonas’Zash, any votes from you in this meeting?
Ge0rGjonas’: well yes; I'm not blocking it, I'm merely sticking a finger into the air and waving energetically
jonas’Ge0rG, that’s right
jonas’moving on then
jonas’6) Date of Next
jonas’that’s a quorum.
ZashNone from me.
jonas’I got nothing, does anyone else have anything?
jonas’see noone sending out typing notifcations, assuming nothing else