jonas’(I’ll now also stop being distracted by that other channel)
jonas’4) Items for voting
jonas’5) Pending votes
jonas’dwd and daniel are pending on the Service Outage status
jonas’(expiring next week)
dwdI'll get to those after this, I don't have a vote currently.
danielstill on list
jonas’6) Date of Next
jonas’that’s a quorum :)
jonas’I’ve got one
jonas’are there any initiatives in the community to implement interoperable A/V group calls you know of?
danielDino's got funding for that
jonas’I have heard about the dino folks planning something (<https://dino.im/blog/2020/08/setting-out-for-calls-and-conferences/>), but no details and I also saw this: https://dino.im/blog/2020/08/setting-out-for-calls-and-conferences/
dwdThere have been loads in the past.
jonas’I have heard about the dino folks planning something (<https://dino.im/blog/2020/08/setting-out-for-calls-and-conferences/>), but no details and I also saw this: https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/6235#issuecomment-616721373
danielif/when they are succesfull i'll probably implement that too
dwdIt'd be useful to get these discussions on the mailing list; there's people like Fippo there who could make a lot of contributions.
jonas’I’ll ping the dino folks then
jonas’the attitude of the jitsi folks is very disappointing by the way (see the second link above)
danielif they get the funding to scrap the necessary (server-side) pieces from jitsi the client side might actually be fairly simple
daniel(if you already have working a/v)
jonas’and it needs to be maintained as a standard
jonas’ok, but thanks, this was my AOB
ZashI vaguely recall something about Dino planning group calls as just n:n calls, for a small n
danielyes. someone needs to document the diff to the existing standard
dwdYou can do full-mesh and avoid the need for SFU negotiation, certainly.
danielZash, both to my knowledge
danielyes (other AOB)
jonas’(that’s how jitsi operates, too; it seamlessly switches between p2p and bridged mode depending on number of users. by default, the threshold is 3)
jonas’daniel, go ahead
danieldo I need to clarify 363 wrt to the discussion we had this morning?
danielor is it clear enough already?
jonas’daniel, I think adding extra wording would benefit the reader
jonas’as dwd mentioned, it’s not strictly necessary though
dwddaniel, I think that:
a) It's clear enough, and
b) It's not something for Council to worry over, but perhaps the list.
ZashI don't see how clarification hurts 🙂
jonas’Zash, at some point, you end up with too many words
jonas’but I agree with dwd on (b) specifically
jonas’taking the silence and lack of typing notifications as a no