XMPP Council - 2021-06-09

  1. Ge0rG

    It looks like I have a short-term scheduling conflict and won't be able to participate. PR#1066 looks reasonable and makes sense, but I'm no server dev, so I'm +0. PR#1062 with the change suggested by stpeter will remove a formerly valid value that might still exist in the wild, so I suggest adding a note about the removal to the note.

  2. jonas’

    Thanks Ge0rG

  3. jonas’

    1) Roll Call

  4. Zash rolls

  5. jonas’

    ate too much?

  6. Zash

    Maybe. Or maybe it was a dice roll?

  7. daniel


  8. jonas’


  9. jonas’

    apparently, we don’t have a dwd

  10. Zash

    So 3/5

  11. jonas’

    good enough

  12. jonas’

    2) Agenda Bashing

  13. jonas’

    to everyones surprise, we’ve got stuff on the agenda

  14. jonas’

    Zash, good point about the PR with the pending change. I intended to leave it out because of that,and then forgot it when I actually composed the email :)

  15. jonas’

    3) Editor’s Update

  16. jonas’

    we finally merged two ancient PRs, otherwise nothing out of the ordinary

  17. jonas’

    4) Items for Voting

  18. jonas’

    4a) XEP-0124: Fix incorrect attribute name in text URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1066

  19. jonas’

    we got a +0 from Ge0rG on that one

  20. jonas’

    I trust MattJ sufficiently to do the due diligence there to be +1

  21. Zash


  22. daniel

    on list. sorry i didn’t prepare. busy two days

  23. jonas’

    gotcha,no worries

  24. jonas’

    what is it with my spacebar today

  25. jonas’

    4b) XEP-0045 - Fix typo missed in rev. 1.25 URL: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1062

  26. jonas’

    Zash brought up the valid point that this is going to change soon and we thus shouldn’t vote on it.

  27. jonas’

    Ge0rG brought up the valid point that a note needs to be added about the now-removed `"none"` value.

  28. jonas’

    so I’ll bring that back to the PR author and we skip the vote

  29. jonas’

    5) Pending Votes

  30. jonas’

    dwd is pending on the complaince suites protoxep, but that isn’t going to change today

  31. jonas’

    6) Date of Next

  32. jonas’

    +1w wfm

  33. Zash

    +1w wfm

  34. daniel


  35. jonas’


  36. jonas’

    7) AOB

  37. jonas’

    anyone anything?

  38. jonas’


  39. jonas’

    a wild dwd appears

  40. dwd

    Argh, sorry, didn't notice the time.

  41. dwd

    Also, compliance suites protoxep, +1 to adopt that and give it a nunber.

  42. jonas’


  43. jonas’

    taking the silence as an absence of AOBs ...

  44. jonas’

    8) Ite Meeting Est

  45. jonas’

    Thanks everyone!

  46. Zash

    Thanks jonas’, all.

  47. dwd

    4a) +1

  48. jonas’

    dwd, noted, thanks!