-
jonas’
Reminder that I'm not available for chairing tomorrow
-
Ge0rG
Damn, you really put 313 onto the agenda
-
jonas’
:)
-
Ge0rG
For the record: my opposition is not to publishing it as it is implemented but as it is written, where it diverges from the former
-
Ge0rG
And maybe a little to try to force the author to write down the already known archival rules, but that plan obviously failed for the last year or so
-
jonas’
I'm not a fan of trying to force authors
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, if you think that implemented is not a subset of what is written substantially, then please write that (and only that) down somewhere
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: writing to the list now, in response to my LC mail, trying to sort those issues into buckets.
-
jonas’
thank you very much!
-
jonas’
gotta clean the kitchen now
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: btw, your email client is broken. It's adding newlines into URLs
-
jonas’
yes
-
jonas’
I know
-
jonas’
one day I'll fix that
-
Zash
Web browser is apparently okay with this
-
Ge0rG
Zash: there is a weird workaround where browsers silently remove newlines from pasted URLs
-
Zash
Indeed
-
moparisthebest
fixed: > there is a weird workaround where browsers silently *do things to* URLs
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: I've reviewed and grouped my last very long LC feedback into blocking and non-blocking, as discussed last time
-
jonas’
I'm gonna make raspberry cheesecake now so unlikely that I'm going to read this before thursday
-
jonas’
but thanks :)
-
Ge0rG
TL;DR bad news: I'm not going to +1 tomorrow.
-
MattJ
Re. archiving rules: I have stated elsewhere (I feel like it was the list, but it was a while ago) that I'm happy to document them, but not in 313
-
MattJ
Cross-referencing is fine
-
MattJ
The archiving rules are not as stable as the query protocol
-
Ge0rG
MattJ: yeah, which is why I've put them into the "non-blocking" bucket.
-
Ge0rG
my fear was just that the rules will never get documented and we have a kind of 0066 tribal-knowledge-required situation
-
MattJ
I agree with that sentiment
-
MattJ
But someone needs to document it, and I don't see the lack of documentation as a reason to block 313 any longer (it seems we agree about that anyway)
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, FWIW, I consider adding the CVE stuff mostly editorial
-
Ge0rG
jonas’: I don't disagree with that, but the CVE stuff is just icing on the cake to the non existing security considerations section
-
jonas’
Ge0rG, -> xsf@, too