a) Published Update XEP-0060 that passed Council last week
b) Proposed XMPP Extension: PubSub Type Filtering
(https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-filter.html)
daniel
4) Items for voting
daniel
a) Proposed XMPP Extension: PubSub Type Filtering https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-filter.html
daniel
+1 lgtm
moparisthebest
+1 , not sure discovery is even necessary, but good to go
larma
+1 for me as well
jonas’
+1
Ge0rG
on-list
daniel
thank you
daniel
5) Pending votes
daniel
Everyone on partial form submission in XEP-0004 and subsequent XEP-0060 edit.
daniel
we had some list discussions on that
moparisthebest
+1 and +1
daniel
and i for my part a ready to vote +1 on both of them
larma
+1 both for me as well
daniel
larma, both i assume?
larma
that's what I meant with both
Ge0rG
+1 for both PRs
daniel
thank you larma just wanted to be explicit for the record
jonas’
+0, noting that this is a normative change which just happens to align with the implementations we asked✎
jonas’
+0, to '4, noting that this is a normative change which just happens to align with the implementations we asked ✏
jonas’
+0 to the '60 change, because it depends on the '4 one
Ge0rG
the added content in #1153 sounds like a banality, but it's probably good to explicitly write it out
daniel
thank you
daniel
Ge0rG, is pending on #1152
daniel
do you want to vote on that now? if not you have another week
Ge0rG
daniel: +1 on #1152 as well. it's also semi-normative
daniel
awesome. thank you
Ge0rG
it was also part of #1154, so I implicitly approved it above ;)
daniel
6) Date of next
daniel
+1w wfm
moparisthebest
+1w wfm also
Ge0rG
+1W WFM
larma
I might not be able to make next week, but I will try
daniel
ack
jonas’
+1w wfm
daniel
7) AOB
larma
yes
daniel
go ahead larma
larma
I contacted the two authors of XEP-0272 about a month ago to get feedback regarding the changes to the XEP I proposed. They did not react and as far as I can tell seem to not be involved with XMPP anymore.
daniel
contacted in private i assume?
larma
yes, I don't know any public contact from them, only the address stated in the XEP
jonas’
never heard the names even
daniel
right. by public i was implying the standards list
jonas’
given your current work in the conferencing section, I'd be happy to vote in favour to grant you ownership fwiw
moparisthebest
domain redirects to https://www.collabora.com/ now
daniel
i generally agree with jonas’ but i'm wondering if The Correct Approach(tm) would be to leave feedback on the standards list before we declare it abandoned
moparisthebest, did not, good idea, although the emails did not bounce on the .co.uk addresses
daniel
(they might not even work there anymore given how fast people change jobs in IT)
moparisthebest
but yes equally inclined to figure out "correct way" and then grant ownership to larma
Ge0rG
There is also xmpp:sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk
larma
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#proposal
> In case the XEP has been abandoned by its author(s), any other individual can propose advancement in their stead. The Approving Body will then require a Document Shepherd to take on responsibilities on behalf of the XEP author during the proposal and approval processes.
ncahuillahas joined
daniel
can you just post your feedback on list. it's probably interesting plus we can ensure that they aren’t subscribed to the list anymore with a different email address and/or stopped caring
moparisthebest
so no guidance on what constitutes "has been abandoned" ?
Ge0rG
moparisthebest: we don't have hard criteria on that, and I'd rather not try to define some
moparisthebest
but yea maybe list + CC their emails and if no response I'm ok with calling it abandoned
larma
Sounds good
Ge0rG
I also agree that larma can take over ownership if there is no public response from the authors
daniel
right. i would expect the outcome to be that larma takes over. i just want a clean path towards that
daniel
any other AOB?
daniel
assuming none
daniel
8) Close
daniel
thank you all
Ge0rG
Thanks, daniel
larma
Thanks 🙂
moparisthebest
thanks daniel !
moparisthebest
not official AOB, but if you have a minute check xsf@ and give feedback, I'm inclined to declare _xmppconnect from '156 insecure and remove it
moparisthebest
PR to come...
jonas’
sorry, I had to run quickly, no AOB from me, thanks daniel :)