daniela) Published Update XEP-0060 that passed Council last week
b) Proposed XMPP Extension: PubSub Type Filtering
daniel4) Items for voting
daniela) Proposed XMPP Extension: PubSub Type Filtering https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-filter.html
moparisthebest+1 , not sure discovery is even necessary, but good to go
larma+1 for me as well
daniel5) Pending votes
danielEveryone on partial form submission in XEP-0004 and subsequent XEP-0060 edit.
danielwe had some list discussions on that
moparisthebest+1 and +1
danieland i for my part a ready to vote +1 on both of them
larma+1 both for me as well
daniellarma, both i assume?
larmathat's what I meant with both
Ge0rG+1 for both PRs
danielthank you larma just wanted to be explicit for the record
jonas’+0, noting that this is a normative change which just happens to align with the implementations we asked✎
jonas’+0, to '4, noting that this is a normative change which just happens to align with the implementations we asked ✏
jonas’+0 to the '60 change, because it depends on the '4 one
Ge0rGthe added content in #1153 sounds like a banality, but it's probably good to explicitly write it out
danielGe0rG, is pending on #1152
danieldo you want to vote on that now? if not you have another week
Ge0rGdaniel: +1 on #1152 as well. it's also semi-normative
danielawesome. thank you
Ge0rGit was also part of #1154, so I implicitly approved it above ;)
daniel6) Date of next
moparisthebest+1w wfm also
larmaI might not be able to make next week, but I will try
danielgo ahead larma
larmaI contacted the two authors of XEP-0272 about a month ago to get feedback regarding the changes to the XEP I proposed. They did not react and as far as I can tell seem to not be involved with XMPP anymore.
danielcontacted in private i assume?
larmayes, I don't know any public contact from them, only the address stated in the XEP
jonas’never heard the names even
danielright. by public i was implying the standards list
jonas’given your current work in the conferencing section, I'd be happy to vote in favour to grant you ownership fwiw
moparisthebestdomain redirects to https://www.collabora.com/ now
danieli generally agree with jonas’ but i'm wondering if The Correct Approach(tm) would be to leave feedback on the standards list before we declare it abandoned
larmamoparisthebest, did not, good idea, although the emails did not bounce on the .co.uk addresses
daniel(they might not even work there anymore given how fast people change jobs in IT)
moparisthebestbut yes equally inclined to figure out "correct way" and then grant ownership to larma
Ge0rGThere is also xmpp:firstname.lastname@example.org
> In case the XEP has been abandoned by its author(s), any other individual can propose advancement in their stead. The Approving Body will then require a Document Shepherd to take on responsibilities on behalf of the XEP author during the proposal and approval processes.
danielcan you just post your feedback on list. it's probably interesting plus we can ensure that they aren’t subscribed to the list anymore with a different email address and/or stopped caring
moparisthebestso no guidance on what constitutes "has been abandoned" ?
Ge0rGmoparisthebest: we don't have hard criteria on that, and I'd rather not try to define some
moparisthebestbut yea maybe list + CC their emails and if no response I'm ok with calling it abandoned
Ge0rGI also agree that larma can take over ownership if there is no public response from the authors
danielright. i would expect the outcome to be that larma takes over. i just want a clean path towards that
danielany other AOB?
danielthank you all
moparisthebestthanks daniel !
moparisthebestnot official AOB, but if you have a minute check xsf@ and give feedback, I'm inclined to declare _xmppconnect from '156 insecure and remove it
moparisthebestPR to come...
jonas’sorry, I had to run quickly, no AOB from me, thanks daniel :)