XMPP Council - 2023-03-01

  1. daniel

    It's time

  2. moparisthebest


  3. daniel

    1) Roll call

  4. Ge0rG


  5. jonas’


  6. larma


  7. daniel

    2) Agenda bashing

  8. daniel

    nothing to bash

  9. daniel

    3) Editors update

  10. daniel

    none yet but hopefully soon

  11. daniel

    4) Items for voting

  12. daniel

    JC has picked up work again on retraction and moderation. but the xeps are currently in proposed state

  13. daniel

    we need to revert them back to experimental to allow him to work on them

  14. jonas’

    hasn't the last call expired?

  15. daniel

    yes; but that means it goes to rejected or we need to decide we revert them

  16. jonas’

    when did it expire?

  17. daniel

    10 month ago?

  18. jonas’

    then it restarts

  19. jonas’

    because council reelection

  20. daniel

    the last call restarts?

  21. jonas’


  22. daniel

    but that doesn’t help us

  23. daniel

    we want experimental because JC wants to work on it

  24. jonas’


  25. jonas’

    happy to send it back there

  26. moparisthebest


  27. daniel

    a) Revert 'XEP-0424: Message Retraction', currently 'Proposed' back to Experimental.

  28. moparisthebest


  29. larma


  30. jonas’

    or cant we iterate on the changes in the context of lc feedback?

  31. Ge0rG


  32. daniel


  33. jonas’

    anyway, I'm +1

  34. larma

    jonas’, technically, the last call was finished and the council decided to formally reject the proposal. we now have to formally vote to move it back to Experimental state

  35. daniel

    b) Revert 'XEP-0425: Message Moderation', currently 'Proposed' back to Experimental.

  36. daniel


  37. larma


  38. moparisthebest


  39. Ge0rG


  40. jonas’


  41. daniel

    ^ Kev once the PRs are not marked draft anymore you can do Proposed->Experimental and the merge in one stop

  42. daniel

    I'll leave the same feedback on Github later

  43. Kev

    I'll try to figure that out, thanks :)

  44. daniel

    5) Pending votes

  45. daniel


  46. daniel

    6) Date of next

  47. Zash

    > feedback on Github 😠️

  48. daniel

    +1w wfm

  49. Kev

    > > feedback on Github> 😠️ Feedback on things the Editor needs to do, on GitHub is fine, IMO.

  50. jonas’

    +1w probably works for me

  51. Ge0rG

    +1w wfm

  52. Kev

    (More than fine, desirable, at least for me)

  53. larma

    +1w should wfm

  54. daniel

    7) AOB

  55. moparisthebest

    +1w wfm

  56. moparisthebest

    No aob

  57. daniel

    8) Close

  58. daniel

    Thank you all

  59. larma

    thanks daniel, thanks all

  60. moparisthebest

    Thanks daniel

  61. Kev

    Apology from one of the Editors that I've been so shit so far. I'm trying to get on top of it. P.S. Jonas was clearly a saint.

  62. stpeter

    Speaking of saints, I need to step up my efforts, too!