in case someone isn’t clear about the phrasing. this was previous rejected by council
Ge0rG
What was the last council discussion status on that?
daniel
just like content types from last week
Ge0rG
It's not harmful, so let's move it through?
daniel
the reason that we are reconsidering it is that some people feel like the situation has changed now
daniel
it was previously rejected due to duplicating JMI
daniel
but since we are now trying to make JMI stable without it also doing what call invites does call invites no longer duplicates JMI
daniel
+1
jonas’
oh look
jonas’
another room which isn't autojoined by poezio
jonas’
sorry for being late
Ge0rG
I still dislike the split into two XEPs.
jonas’
(please feel free to ping me in other places if I'm not showing up here at council time!)
Ge0rG
But that's probably still better than having it stall for another year or so, and also existing codebases.
Ge0rG
+1
moparisthebest
I'll note my dislike of not having security considerations, I think they should exist, but regardless +1 let the running code decide which should win
jonas’
+1 on LC for '353
jonas’
+1 for accepting call-invites.html
daniel
5) Pending votes
daniel
moparisthebest, is pending on everything from last week
daniel
nothing else pending. a few votes from Ge0rG have expired last week
Ge0rG
I'm very sorry about that.
moparisthebest
I'm gonna have to remain pending for now, will fix shortly
daniel
ok no worries. feel free to either reply to the email agenda from last week or ping me in here
daniel
6) Date of next
daniel
+1w wfm
moparisthebest
+1w wfm
jonas’
I might not make it, I have a meeting until 14:00Z at $dayjob and (a) it might overrun, (b) I might be on my way home at council time, or (c) I get dragged/invited to dinner afterward
daniel
noted
daniel
7) AOB
jonas’
none from me
Ge0rG
none here either
moparisthebest
Nor here
daniel
8) Close
daniel
thank you all
jonas’
thanks daniel
Ge0rG
Thank you, daniel
moparisthebest
Thanks daniel
larma
Sorry indeed was travelling. +1 for both from me as well