-
moparisthebest
here are my missing votes: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xep-scram-upgrade.html - +1 https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1215/files - +1 https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/content-types.html - +1 - I have nits and suggestions on this one, but we can discuss/propose as a XEP
-
jonas’
I got held up at work
-
daniel
it’s time
-
daniel
1) roll call
-
larma
👋️
-
jonas’
I'll try to look at things here with some partial atetntion
-
moparisthebest
Hello
-
daniel
no worries jonas’
-
daniel
is Ge0rG here?
-
Ge0rG
Hi, I'm still in a call, will be here in a moment
-
daniel
2) Agenda bashing
-
daniel
nothing to bash
-
daniel
3) Editors update
-
daniel
nothing new this week
-
daniel
note to self to copy our decisions from the spreadsheet to github though
-
daniel
4) Items for voting
-
daniel
a) XEP-0424: Remove dependency on XEP-0422 'Message Fastening' (https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1270)
-
daniel
+1
-
moparisthebest
+1
-
Kev
> note to self to copy our decisions from the spreadsheet to github though Or other mechanism (e.g. mail) if that's more convenient :)
-
larma
What are we voting on, even?
-
daniel
larma, what do you mean?
-
Kev
Wasn't it the case that 424 and 425 were rejected in last call, and Council needed to let me know if it was a Rejection or back to Experimental or something? I forget.
-
daniel
wait i thought both are stable?
-
larma
What Kev said
-
larma
No, they are not
-
Kev
Both appear to be Proposed. They failed their Council vote, I'm told, but I don't know which of the two outcomes they failed with.
-
larma
Council decided to not advance them to stable but did not decide what else to do with it
-
daniel
ah I see. sorry I was confused. I thought those were stable and we were voting on merging the PR
-
daniel
ok let's scrap the vote on (a)
-
larma
If it was Stable, I would clearly be against that change, as this is not a change we can make to a stable XEP (otherwise it wouldn't be stable at all)
-
Kev
Probably my fault, sorry.
-
daniel
and vote instead of moving XEP-0422 back to experimental✎ -
larma
0424
-
daniel
and vote instead of moving XEP-0424 back to experimental ✏
-
daniel
indeed
-
moparisthebest
Then +1 :)
-
larma
I'm +1 on that 🙂
-
jonas’
(ok, I notice I cannot pay enough attention, please don't block on me today)
-
Ge0rG
+1 on moving to experimental
-
daniel
+1
-
daniel
thank you.
-
daniel
can I get your votes on 'Move XEP-0425 back to experimental'
-
daniel
+1
-
larma
+1
-
Ge0rG
+1
-
moparisthebest
+1
-
daniel
5) Pending votes
-
daniel
none
-
daniel
6) Date of next
-
Ge0rG
+1W WFM
-
moparisthebest
+1w wfm
-
larma
+1w wfm
-
daniel
I’m here next week. but heads up that I’m on vacation the two weeks after that (the 9th and the 16th)
-
Ge0rG
that's great, I'm on vacation just a few weeks later :D
-
larma
You mean 10th and 17th?
-
daniel
yes
-
daniel
i’ll take that as a sign that I actually need the vacation
-
daniel
7) AOB
-
moparisthebest
Aob: I assume you got my pending votes I sent last night?
-
daniel
yes
-
moparisthebest
Excellent, thanks, then no more from me
-
daniel
OK. I don’t see anyone typing. assuming no other AOB
-
daniel
8) Close
-
daniel
thanks all
-
moparisthebest
Thanks daniel
-
larma
Thanks all.
-
moparisthebest
I think there's a security hole in the 425 PR btw, put a GitHub comment right before the meeting, will review more later
-
daniel
it's an IQ sent to the server; the service can just validate that, no?
-
daniel
it's not clients that parse that or something
-
moparisthebest
Then it's fine
-
jonas’
I'm on vacation next week, but I'll try to make the meeting nontheless
-
jonas’
(I'll be off on the last week of may though)