-
Ge0rG
As we don't have minutes, I'm on-listing here instead... > I feel we should migrate to RFC 8174 for clarity, but we probably want to do it in a way that does not change the meaning of existing XEPs I'm +1 to add a meta tag to the XEP template to clarify which RFC applies, and default it to 8174 for new documents, so -1 to the PR as is daniel [18:24]: > b) XEP-0001: Make only editorial changes affect Deferred state +1 daniel [18:25]: > c) XEP-0166: Relax transport element requirement -1 until convincing arguments come up in the thread