XMPP Council - 2024-12-10

Daniel: I'd like to propose for discussion XEP-0424 and XEP-0425 (Retractions and moderated retractions). Doesn't have to be today necessarily. AFAIK I've addressed all previous comments.

jcbrand: you would like to start another LC?

Yes

It‘s time

1) Roll call

here

👋

Here!

2) Agenda bashing

no agenda but I want to go through the pending votes

3) Editors update

none

4) Items for voting

none. (I saw jcbrand’s request but will add that to next weeks agenda)

5) Pending votes

i just recorded singpolyma +1 for muc activity indicator

meaning we are missing goffis vote on that

+1, but I'm not fond of the UUID in the namespace, I would like more a human-friendly namespace.

OK, fine then.

I think that uuid-uri is meant to be temporary for until the xep gets accepted ✏

yes. i'll ask jonas to change that. I think very very technically jonas might be correct in that a proto xep shouldnt just self assign namespaces. but in practice we have always done that and with my editor hat I would suggest we continue doing that

i don’t think editor needs the workload of either coming up with a namespace or adding the extra roundtrip in asking the author after the xep gets accepted

yeah, that sounds like useless complication.

If an author picked an absurd one, we could trap it here, right?

I guess.

dan.caseley, yeah that too. now it's basically up to the editor to either accept or reject the NS that jonas chooses which doesn’t sound right either

i'm sure it wont be a problem in this case. but giving council a finished xep w/o temp namespaces sounds like a better approach

anyway thanks for the vote goffi. this means the xeps is accepted

(FWIW, I don't think a ProtoXEP is 'self-assigning', but rather is proposing an assignment)

6) Date of next

+1w wfm

+1w wfm

(we can decide next week on a winter/holiday break)

+1w wfm

> yes. i'll ask jonas to change that. I think very very technically jonas might be correct in that a proto xep shouldnt just self assign namespaces. but in practice we have always done that and with my editor hat I would suggest we continue doing that jonas indicated that editor could even just change the namespace on merge ↺

(sorry for being late, but seems I didn't miss any votes)

yes with my editor hat on i don’t want to do that. i’ll just ask jonas to do the change

7) AOB

assuming none

8) Close

thank you all. see you next week

Thanks

Thanks daniel, thanks all

Thanks!