-
daniel
it’s time
-
daniel
1) Roll call
-
larma
👋
-
goffi
here
-
singpolyma
here
-
daniel
dan.caseley, are you here too?
-
daniel
2) Agenda bashing
-
daniel
not much on the agenda so nothing to bash
-
daniel
3) Editors updates
-
dan.caseley
Here
-
daniel
none. I’m monitoring two PR from larma. is there a reason those are still draft?
-
daniel
4) items for voting
-
daniel
none. I guess there is still an active discussion around FAST so no point in putting that on the agenda
-
daniel
5) Pending votes
-
goffi
What about the Shared XML PR?
-
daniel
some people are pending on retraction but I guess both goffi and I want at least some of our feedback addressed?
-
larma
> none. I’m monitoring two PR from larma. is there a reason those are still draft? There was the idea/proposal to finally write down a dedicated "how we ID messages" XEP. It wasn't deeply discussed, so maybe I can get a few opinions here? ↺
-
daniel
goffi, shared xml pr? what did i miss
-
daniel
oh the Link Mauve one. yes I just responded to that asking Link Mauve to rebase and fix conflicts
-
goffi
daniel, ` [XEP-0284] Shared XML Editing revival`, yes, the Link Mauve one.
-
goffi
oh OK I was not aware there were comments on this.
-
daniel
larma, in absence of such a xep personally i'd be happy to merge those two PRs for now. i mean I don’t think that the changes will be wrong
-
daniel
they may or may not just duplicate what ever that hypothetical xep will say
-
daniel
plus personally i don’t think the "what id to use" is that complicated if we ignore our brief detour with origin-id
-
larma
daniel, sounds good to me
-
daniel
6) Date of Next
-
daniel
+1w wfm
-
goffi
+1w wfm
-
larma
+1w wfm
-
daniel
7) AOB
-
dan.caseley
+1w wfm (Sorry, kids school holidays here, making it hard)
-
daniel
assuming no AOB
-
daniel
8) Close
-
daniel
thank you all. see you next week
-
singpolyma
+1w wfm
-
goffi
Thanks Daniel, Thanks all.